Re: F430 vs. F50 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fellippe Galletta (fellippe.galletta![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:57:00 -0700 (PDT) |
On 9/17/07, LarryT <l02turner [at] comcast.net> wrote: > > According to 1-97 R&T, the F50 has 513hp, 0-60 in 3.6 sec. > The F430 Spyder in 9-05 R&T says: 483hp nd 0-60 in 4.0Sec > > So, even with ~10 yr newer technoilogy, the F50 beats it quite handily. > > Let me know if you need more data - Well, if you're gonna quote acceleration times, could you put up the 1/4 mile ET & trap speeds? Also, 0-150 mph times for either car would be awesome... Someone said it well that a true measure of supercar acceleration is to be able to hit 150 mph in 20 seconds or less...you'd be surprised how many "fast" cars cannot do this. 0-60 is almost meaningless to me, because you can take two cars with identical 0-60s that have very different real world acceleration abilities... Also, what's the consensus of the F50's true weight? It's no secret that Ferrari likes to underquote weight..2700-2800 lbs might be on the lighter side of things for the F50. thx, FG
- Re: F430 vs. F50, (continued)
-
Re: F430 vs. F50 Hans E. Hansen, September 17 2007
-
Re: F430 vs. F50 Fellippe Galletta, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 Dave Mills, September 17 2007
-
Re: F430 vs. F50 Fellippe Galletta, September 17 2007
-
Re: F430 vs. F50 LarryT, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 Fellippe Galletta, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 Peter Pless, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 francis newman, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 Rick Lindsay, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 LarryT, September 17 2007
-
Re: F430 vs. F50 Hans E. Hansen, September 17 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.