Re: F430 vs. F50 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: ken rentiers (rentiers![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:24:04 -0700 (PDT) |
I could tell a joke here about an old girlfriend who used to
calibrate in foot longs per fortnight, but I won't.
On Sep 18, 2007, at 8:10 AM, LarryT wrote:
ROTFLMAO !!
You;re a Hoot!
Hmm.... wonder if I can get my speedo calibrate in FPF? (forlongs per fortnight)
Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs .
----- Original Message ----- From: A.J. Merrifield To: LarryT ; The FerrariList Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:15 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] F430 vs. F50
200kph, by the way, is 334049.15294678928 furlongs per fortnight. Just so you know.
- A.J.
- Re: F430 vs. F50, (continued)
- Re: F430 vs. F50 Rick Lindsay, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 LarryT, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 A.J. Merrifield, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 LarryT, September 18 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 ken rentiers, September 18 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 jimshadow, September 18 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 Rick Lindsay, September 18 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.