Re: F430 vs. F50 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: jimshadow (jimshadow![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:43:37 -0700 (PDT) |
Would she calibrate as she was preparing to pull a train?? :) Jim Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -----Original Message----- From: ken rentiers <rentiers [at] mac.com> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:23:57 To:JIM <jimshadow [at] verizon.net> Cc:The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] F430 vs. F50 I could tell a joke here about an old girlfriend who used to calibrate in foot longs per fortnight, but I won't. On Sep 18, 2007, at 8:10 AM, LarryT wrote: > ROTFLMAO !! > > You;re a Hoot! > > Hmm.... wonder if I can get my speedo calibrate in FPF? > (forlongs per fortnight) > > Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) > www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts > Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil > PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net > Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs > . > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: A.J. Merrifield > To: LarryT ; The FerrariList > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] F430 vs. F50 > > > 200kph, by the way, is 334049.15294678928 furlongs per > fortnight. Just so you know. > - A.J. _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/jimshadow%40verizon.net Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: F430 vs. F50, (continued)
- Re: F430 vs. F50 LarryT, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 A.J. Merrifield, September 17 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 LarryT, September 18 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 ken rentiers, September 18 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 jimshadow, September 18 2007
- Re: F430 vs. F50 Rick Lindsay, September 18 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.