Re: GT-R vs. F355 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dennis Liu (bigheaddennis![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:32:01 -0800 (PST) |
Very interesting, Mr Singh. But my original statements are still true; you haven't pointed out anything to refute them (and indeed, only added support for what I wrote). I wrote: "With naturally aspirated motors, your only two real options are more displacement (see Viper), or more revs (see 430)" You replied: "This is magazine propaganda from 1987." ========= Really? Let's see. Chevy wanted more power from its V8. So what did it do? In the modern era, they first tried adding REVS - the LT1 V-8 with 300 hp already displaced 5.7 liters, which was much bigger than any Porsche or Ferrari or BMW of the time, so they went to the the 4-valve, DOHC Lotus-designed LT5 that rev'ed to 7200 rpm and made 375 hp. Another decade of evolution did add more power, but still not enough to keep up with Porsche and Ferrari - so, the next step? Chevy ADDED DISPLACEMENT. Went to 6.0L for the the standard Vette (and bumped up the redline too, while they were at it). Still not enough? Make it EVEN BIGGER, at 6.2 liters. Enough? Nope. They had to go to SEVEN liters for the C6 Z06. Oh, and they also bumped up the redline to 7k! So, what's "propaganda", Mr. Singh? That Chevy when decided it needed to get more power from its V8 architecture, it INCREASED DISPLACEMENT and ADDEDED REVs? ========= Now, don't get me wrong - I think the LS3/LS7 are fabulous motors. But with "only" 505 hp from seven liters of big displacement, that's only 72.1 hp/liter. >From your link, a tuner is offering a more powerful version of that motor. At an estimated 600 hp, from a naturally aspirated SEVEN LITER V8. That's still only 85.7 hp/liter. In stock trim, the Nissan GT-R motor produces 480hp from 3.8 liters. That's 126.3 hp/liter. When tuners want to make BIG power, they add forced induction. See, e.g., Hennessey Vipers, Mallett supercharged Vettes, and many, many more. Even Ford gave up and added a supercharger to its V8 for the GT and GT500. Tuners are salivating to get their hands on the new Nissan motor. As I noted before, it's easy enough to modify turbos and plumbing and software to get hefty hp increases from forced induction engines (see, STi, Evo, 911 turbo, Noble, AMG, etc.) You can spend $10k on your 996 turbo and drive away with 650 hp. So it's easy enough to imagine that a GT-R variant will have 650-700hp for $10k. Lash, your example costs $7k for the parts - still need to take your car APART and rebuild it. Total out the door price? Kinda doubt you could do it for $10k. But even if you could, you're still 50-100 hp down! ========== You also wrote: >Remember, these 600bhp engines routinely get 2x fuel economy and are lighter/smaller as well. 2x fuel economy? Really, Lashdeep? The Z06 is quoted at 16/26 mpg. The new Nissan GT-R gets 19.3 mpg in the Japanese combined cycle. Dunno what the official American EPA MPG will be, but am pretty sure that it won't be 8 mpg city / 13 mpg highway. :-P Again, I think the 355 is stunningly beautiful, much more so than the 360 (though the 430 is close). And it is way, way fun to drive. But it'll get smoked in this crowd. And even the 355CH, with which I can pass C5 Z06s at the track, will get its ass handed to it by the current Z06 and 997tt, and no doubt with the GT-R too. Time passes. It'll be interesting to see if the GT-R, with about 300-400 more pounds than a 430 and the same power, will be able to overcome that with the advantages of its AWD (on the track). vty, --Dennis -----Original Message----- From: LS [mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:34 PM To: BigHeadDennis [at] gmail.com Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] GT-R vs. F355 I was very, very reluctant to believe it but it's happening... http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68050 This is magazine propaganda from 1987. The secret force in pushrod engine building is engine mgmt, combustion efficiency and then proper tuning. This is what is making the difference in today's powerplants. Check out Mallett and Katech's site....that link above is not an extreme build. Remember, these 600bhp engines routinely get 2x fuel economy and are lighter/smaller as well. Forced induction is a solution for a bad basic engine design not a feature in 2007. LS ----- Original Message ---- From: Dennis Liu <bigheaddennis [at] gmail.com> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 11:49:31 AM Subject: RE: [Ferrari] GT-R vs. F355 The only way to get the Z06 motor to 650-700hp easily (and with some degree of reliability) is with forced induction. With naturally aspirated motors, your only two real options are more displacement (see Viper), or more revs (see 430). Can't rev the pushrod motor that much more, and can't make the motor much bigger without starting clean-sheet. So forced induction - e.g., the new Z07/ZR-1/Blue Devil. But you can't add a tested, reliable turbo/supercharger system in that engine bay for $10k, AFAIK. If you've got more info, would love to see it. I know that some guys are trying turbo systems for the 360 to get some extra horse, since that motor is about topped out in naturally aspirated form, As you probably know, most tuner cars running around in the real world with >600hp have forced induction - Supras, 996tt, AMGs, etc. Easy to do with some new turbos and plumbing, software mods, and higher octane fuel. vty, --Dennis -----Original Message----- From: LS [mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:41 AM To: BigHeadDennis [at] gmail.com Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] GT-R vs. F355 10-4, understand the logic as a daily driver. "And I bet that $10k will get 650-700hp easily, which is NOT possible with the Z06..." Are you sure? LS ----- Original Message ---- From: Dennis Liu <bigheaddennis [at] gmail.com> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 11:22:41 AM Subject: RE: [Ferrari] GT-R vs. F355 Nope, deadly serious. FWIW, the dash was designed by the folks who develop the Gran Turismo games, and I'm sure that shows. Don't really care, though. Faster than a 911 Turbo around the 'Ring, for $68k? Wow. Sure, the Z06 is a great car. But I will never, ever, own a Corvette, and I'd argue that the GT-R is as good a bang-for-the-buck as the Z06, and better than the Viper, and way better than the 911tt, and way way way better than the 430 or Gallardo (again, on a bang-for-the-buck basis). And it should cream the new M3, the RS4, the IS-F, the AMG C, and pretty much anything else. Yeah, I'm hating the extra weight, but AWD is tough to beat at the track. And I bet that $10k will get 650-700hp easily, which is NOT possible with the Z06 (think $120k for the Blue Devil/Z07). The 355s are still more beautiful, evocative, and perhaps more fun to drive, but I can commute to work in the GT-R in January in New England.... vty, --Dennis -----Original Message----- From: LS [mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:15 AM To: Dennis Liu Cc: The FerrariList Subject: [Ferrari] GT-R vs. F355 I'm sure Liu was joking about having a GT-R on order. The preview articles in the recent magazines were like a mix of the owner's manual of my plasma TV and the radar system on the Battlestar Gallactica. 490bhp out of a externally large and heavy V6 with two turbos is sad in 2007...real sad. Real use of technology would've produced a lightweight 500bhp normally aspirated motor that gets at least 25 mpg. Liu, your 355s will lose no respect to 4 wheeled cellphones such as these. LS ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/bigheaddennis%40gmail.c om Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/ ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
- Re: GT-R vs. F355, (continued)
- Re: GT-R vs. F355 Dennis Liu, December 5 2007
-
Re: GT-R vs. F355 LS, December 5 2007
- Re: GT-R vs. F355 Dennis Liu, December 5 2007
-
Re: GT-R vs. F355 LS, December 5 2007
- Re: GT-R vs. F355 Dennis Liu, December 5 2007
-
Re: GT-R vs. F355 LS, December 5 2007
- Re: GT-R vs. F355 Dennis Liu, December 5 2007
-
Re: GT-R vs. F355 LS, December 5 2007
- Re: GT-R vs. F355 Dennis Liu, December 5 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.