Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: jimshadow (jimshadow![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:30:40 -0800 (PST) |
Don't forget about pine trees.....who's gonna chop all of them down in order to get rid of their negative effects on global warming?? I know, get the greenies to kill the cows and peta to shop the pines......problem solved! Back to dreaming about a 2nd Ferrari!!!!!!! Jim Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -----Original Message----- From: "Ferrarisimo [at] Comcast.net" <Ferrarisimo [at] comcast.net> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:56:36 To:JIM <jimshadow [at] verizon.net> Cc:ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners As a confirmed environmentalist and, once, activist - there is plenty we can do to not hurt the planet as much as we do. Like the waste stream - which although beginning to be addressed by wide-scale recycling programs and consumer education - but still manages to continue to grow WORSE everyday. Those are things we CAN control - by limiting the use of one-time products and concentrate on recyclable materials as much as possible. To the contrary, the carbon debate has gotten out of hand. Number one contributors are still bovine flatulence (that's right - cow farts) and volcanic eruptions (while we might cut down the first by reducing beef consumption - we can't do anything about the latter). I recall reading a few years back that the eruptions at Krakatoa and Mt. Penitubo each let off more ozone depleting gas and carbon than a decade of ALL vehicle emissions - including blasting hundreds of tons of SO2 (sulfer-dioxide which both depletes ozone AND causes acid rain) - directly into the upper atmosphere. One article stated that there were more emissions from those two volcanic eruptions that all car emissions - EVER. Sure, we could do better - - and that is one area where we are. I recall reading that, because of emission controls, it is now almost impossible to asphyxiate one's self in a two car garage using the exhaust emissions from one car (although the "suicide guide" says there are still plenty of emissions if you use a hose to divert the exhaust emissions INTO the car). The difference since the advent of the catalytic converter is on the order of one 1970's car being the equivalent of 25 - 30 2000's car. Still, there are so many other sources - home heating, industrial, etc. that are for worse -- from the perspective of Man's carbon footprint. Like anything else, the extremists tend to lose the war that the moderates are fighting. Like Rick said, you are NEVER going to get the people here - let alone India or China to give up their motorbikes and cars to go back to horses and bicycles (hmmm, I wonder how much greenhouse emissions there are in horse farts??) Scottie On Dec 19, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Rick Lindsay wrote: > These folks have exactly one quest; to makes > themselves feel like they are important. > > rick > > --- ken rentiers <rentiers [at] mac.com> wrote: > >> Agree completely Rick. >> >> If the entire human population drank Jim Jones >> Kool-Aid™ today, you >> would need very sensitive instruments to record any >> resultant shift >> in temperatures. It's all a scam by the assembled >> tin-pot caudillos >> of all the reeking, authoritarian, third-world >> cesspools to effect a >> giant transfer of money and power in their >> direction. We need to >> relocate UN headquarters somewhere more appropriate. >> Port-Au-Prince >> comes to mind. >> >> Enjoy your F1 repartee btw. >> >> ken >> >> On Dec 19, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Rick Lindsay wrote: >> >>> This is all stupid. Do these people actually >> think >>> they can regulate a begillion people in the likes >> of >>> China and India - or do they think they can just >>> punish American and Europe for the assumed sins of >> the >>> world? (No, I'm not picking on Asia, just >> developing >>> contries in general.) >>> >>> I am a scientist and I believe that humans CAN >>> influence the climate but only in a tiny >> unmeasurable >>> way compared to what the Earth itself can and HAS >> DONE >>> many times over. I mean, this planet has been >> FROZEN >>> OVER and it has also been a tropical furnace. And >>> these conditions weren't caused by humans or >> fossils >>> using fossil fuels! :-P The point is; It is >> typical >>> human arrogance to believe that we're important >> enough >>> to actually damage the Earth! Folks, on this >> scale, >>> we're just not that important. >>> >>> rick - geophysicist, carbon fuel producer and >> carbon >>> user in a 308GTB >> >> > >_________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ferrarisimo%40comcast.net > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > http://www.BidNip.com/ > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/jimshadow%40verizon.net Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners, (continued)
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners ken rentiers, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners Jason Polzer, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners jimshadow, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners AutoWorld [at] RoadRunner.com, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners jimshadow, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners Paul Bennett, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners JIM WILCOX, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners LarryT, December 19 2007
- Re: Women should stop admiring Ferrari owners LarryT, December 19 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.