Ferrari Mailing List: Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27]

[LarryT (l02turner]

Dr. Steve,
    Thx for the comments - I had written mostly out of frustration - as you 
pointed out, pur 2 "choices" are not much to shout about.  I cannot remember 
when the field was so poorly positioned.  Also, you wrote <<Votes for any other 
third party are "throw-a-ways" that will do no good>>  and may possibly do harm 
- if a vote for BB would otherwise have gone to McLame making Hussien's victory 
more assured.   The Ross Perot effect at work once again.

  Of course, B Barr will never have a chance to run since the main stream media 
will continue to ignore him and the vast majority of US citizens have no idea 
who or what he is and stands for.  He's not perfect but he's closer to being a 
conservative that McLame could dream of being. Now that he must look to real 
conservatives for support and possible victory he's flipping on his position on 
several issues.  One of the more important issues to me is preserving the 2nd 
Amendment for law abiding citizens and not continuing to water it down.   He's 
voted again some important Pro 2nd A legislation and the terrible McLame 
Leiberman Campaign Finance Reform ill which says peoples organizations cannot 
make announcements 30-60 days before an election!  I know the MSM has given the 
term PAC a black eye and bad connotation but all it means is a groups of 
citizens who organize to make their voices easier to hear.  Unions, NRA, AARP 
are all PACs which McLames bill silenced.  They were prevented from telling 
congressmen's voting records 30-60 days prior to an election!  Who'd a thunk 
the Supremes would sing - "Baby, It's OK" when that provision was challenged as 
being protected by the 1st Amendment.  I believe some congressmen signed off 
thinking the Supremes would bouce that provision - but, Nope - didn't happen 
back then - But perhaps recently it was renegotiated.

I can understand your comment about taking a bullet for these 2 clowns - it'd 
be nice to believe you'd be doing something to preserve a very special life.  
All I see are 2 jokers looking for power & to line their pockets.  Hmmm.. can't 
say that as much about McLame - and obama is a committed socialist...

Sorry Dr Steve,didn't mean to write a novella - 
;-)

Take Care,
Larry T
http://youroil.net
Carb & Jet Settings:
http://members.rennlist.org/oil/  - Oil Testing
http://members.rennlist.org/webercarbs/
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com 
  To: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com 
  Cc: l02turner [at] comcast.net 
  Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:33 PM
  Subject: Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue 
27]


  Larry:

  If there were only to be a solution. Do we vote for Barry Hussein Obama, 
whose depth of experience is only exceeded by my son who is a college senior 
and might even graduate eventually, or the McManchurian candidate, a good 
sailor who stood up as best he could for as long as he could to the Hanoi 
Hilton and who is to be respected for that, but that experience is just not 
applicable  to the job he is seeking, particularly after leaving his first wife 
who stood by a Navy POW Aviator during his confinement in the PRVN, but was 
then enticed by the riches of his second wife, who performs the same duties for 
him as Ms. Heinz-Kerry does for her former sailr?

  Votes for any other third party are "throw-a-ways" that will do no good, so 
it is once again a choice of the lesser of two evils a vote AGAINST a candidate 
rather than FOR one.

  And where do we stand financially? According to B. Hussein I am wealthy, and 
according to his opponent I shall never achieve that status. If it were only a 
field of four in which one could choose to vote for POTUS by giving him/her the 
highest number of votes and for V-POTUS by giving him/her the second highest 
number of votes. I would predict a Palin victory for the highest office of the 
land and who knows perhaps Command McManchuria might come in as V-POTUS.

  I am, today, really glad to be retired from my first primary occupation as I 
am not certain that I could respond in the affirmative to the question as to 
whether or not I would "take a bullet" for any of them. I was a simple question 
when Ronald Reagan was alive and well serving as POTUS but self-interest most 
probably would have prevailed (except during the period immediately following 
9/11).

  Dr. Steve

  In a message dated 9/18/2008 5:16:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com writes:
    OK, Time to vent, I'm just a simple little guy 

    1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III...........1975 Pontiac GV Conv.
    1980 MB 450SL..................................1982 RR Corniche
    1985 MB 280 GE G-Wagen................. 1985 GMC Brigadier 20 Ton 
Winch/Wrecker
    1988 Rolls Royce Silver Spur................1990 Cadillac "Eagle" Hearse
    1994 F-350 Powerstroke 4x4................1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder
    1996 Bronco ......................................2000 Lincoln Town Car
    2004 Excursion...................................(+ Audrey's 2x MB's)
    and a
    1976 Fire Truck...................................HAHN, WARNER & SWASEY- 
DUPLEX 
    DIVISION  HOWE  APPARTUS . MODEL #R400 FIRE TRUCK w/a 100' Tower

     
    Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI
    Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory
    Explosives Engineering Technologies
    lex talionis
    Fides tamen Quin

    Legal Notice: This message does not constitute legal or other professional 
advice, nor does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or 
fiduciary relationship between the sender and/or any other party

    Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by 
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and 
is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may 
contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. 
If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and 
destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient 
but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise 
the sender immediately.

    Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be 
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for 
any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arises as a result 
of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest 
fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.