Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BRIGANDBAR (BRIGANDBAR![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:25:24 -0700 (PDT) |
Tom: Maybe so, but I think you have to look at the past several years, at least since 9/11 to judge someone for the highest office in the land. If you believe in the Second Amendment, personal responsibility, and the ability to retain wealth that is earned, then Barry Hussein is not your man. If you are a liberal thinker who believes that those of us who have earned our (sometimes meager) wealth are obligated to use it in furtherance of avarice and indolence, affirmative action that distorts the quality of our employment and educational institutions through reverse discrimination, and that your personal property rights should be subordinated to social engineering, then of course Barry Hussein is the right choice. Its not a matter of good and evil, simply a matter of personal values (and of course the Constitution). If you agree with what B.H.O. has done with his adult life and think that you want America to follow that course vote for him for those reasons, not cute sayings of speech writers that he can memorize and regurgitate. Just hire the man who actually stands for one's personal belief structure, not the pretty face or TV anchorman presentation when recruiting for what may be the most important job in the entire world and is certainly the most important in the United States. If Barry Hussein Obame is your man, go for it. If not, look elsewhere for national leadership. And either way, hopefully we'll still be friends. Dr. Steve In a message dated 9/19/2008 9:24:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time, kjtar [at] cox.net writes: All I know is that Barack is smart, has good people around him, and can speak in public without embarrasing himself (if he were sensitive enough to recognize any slight errors). Also I saw a great quote, which I'll repeat here: Capitalism's criminal excesses saved by socialist governmental policies. (Or something like that, it was in the Tulsa World today, from a Nader speech as OSU Tulsa campus). Tom Reynolds Tulsa, OK ----- Original Message ----- From: <BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com> To: "Tom Reynolds" <kjtar [at] cox.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest,Vol 26, Issue 27] > Larry: > > If there were only to be a solution. Do we vote for Barry Hussein Obama, > whose depth of experience is only exceeded by my son who is a college senior and > might even graduate eventually, or the McManchurian candidate, a good sailor > who stood up as best he could for as long as he could to the Hanoi Hilton and > who is to be respected for that, but that experience is just not applicable > to the job he is seeking, particularly after leaving his first wife who > stood by a Navy POW Aviator during his confinement in the PRVN, but was then > enticed by the riches of his second wife, who performs the same duties for him as > Ms. Heinz-Kerry does for her former sailr? > > Votes for any other third party are "throw-a-ways" that will do no good, so > it is once again a choice of the lesser of two evils a vote AGAINST a > candidate rather than FOR one. > > And where do we stand financially? According to B. Hussein I am wealthy, and > according to his opponent I shall never achieve that status. If it were only > a field of four in which one could choose to vote for POTUS by giving him/her > the highest number of votes and for V-POTUS by giving him/her the second > highest number of votes. I would predict a Palin victory for the highest office > of the land and who knows perhaps Command McManchuria might come in as > V-POTUS. > > I am, today, really glad to be retired from my first primary occupation as I > am not certain that I could respond in the affirmative to the question as to > whether or not I would "take a bullet" for any of them. I was a simple > question when Ronald Reagan was alive and well serving as POTUS but self-interest > most probably would have prevailed (except during the period immediately > following 9/11). > > Dr. Steve > > > In a message dated 9/18/2008 5:16:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com writes: > > OK, Time to vent, I'm just a simple little guy > > 1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III...........1975 Pontiac GV Conv. > 1980 MB 450SL..................................1982 RR Corniche > 1985 MB 280 GE G-Wagen................. 1985 GMC Brigadier 20 Ton > Winch/Wrecker > 1988 Rolls Royce Silver Spur................1990 Cadillac "Eagle" Hearse > 1994 F-350 Powerstroke 4x4................1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder > 1996 Bronco ......................................2000 Lincoln Town Car > 2004 Excursion...................................(+ Audrey's 2x MB's) > and a > 1976 Fire Truck...................................HAHN, WARNER & SWASEY- > DUPLEX > DIVISION HOWE APPARTUS . MODEL #R400 FIRE TRUCK w/a 100' Tower > > > Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI > Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory > Explosives Engineering Technologies > lex talionis > Fides tamen Quin > > Legal Notice: > > > This message does not constitute legal or other professional advice, nor > does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or fiduciary > relationship between the sender and/or any other party > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by > the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and > is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may > contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. > If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient > but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so > advise the sender immediately. > > Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be > guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for > any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arises as a result > of its electronic (e-mail) transmission. > > > > **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, > plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. > (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/kjtar%40cox.net > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > -- > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714 - Release Date: 3/8/07 > > **************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) OT, (continued)
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) OT philville dejazzd.com, October 3 2008
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) OT Adam, October 3 2008
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) OT philville dejazzd.com, October 3 2008
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) OT Doug and Terri Anderson, October 3 2008
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27] BRIGANDBAR, September 19 2008
-
Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27] Mike Fleischer, September 20 2008
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27] LarryT, September 20 2008
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27] Mike Fleischer, September 20 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.