Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: LS (lashdeep![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:42:44 -0800 (PST) |
Honestly, I don't see a problem... Fuse block? That could be easily reproduced...and probably way better than original. Replacement foglights? If you want identical, it might be tough. If you want something that fits and works, there are many vendors out there. Who is going to put crappy Carello foglights into a 328 20 yrs from now? Only if you're going to win a concours. If that is your goal, you should be hunting down every possibly parted out 328 there is. Thanks to the internet and Ebay, doing this is way easier than it was 15 yrs ago. Or, you could try repairing the problem with the current lamp. Melted wiring? Have it re-soldered. Cracked glass? Have it repaired or have someone make a new lens. It can be done. Worn or faded reflector? Have that piece replated. There's a lot of ingenuity out there. If the car is rare, the creativity and brain damage goes up quickly. If you're not out in the garage messin' with old heaps on a daily basis, this may seem like science fiction. LS ________________________________ From: Michael James <cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 1:06:44 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) All true, but Benz is a high-volume production manufacturer - Ferrari, Lambo, Aston, etc. are not - not yet, anyway. Benz can get-away with supporting their old cars because they know there are still tens-of-thousands of them out there, and people want to keep them running. Until Ferrari and other exotics see such production quantities, their parts/support markets will remain relatively 'small' - not exactly an attractive market for an aftermarket parts supplier to pick up an OEM parts vendors' slack should they decide one morning to stop making something - 288 GTO Fuseblocks, for instance, or 328 Fog/Turn signal clusters. There are still LOTS of 328s running around, but if you lunch your front fog lights, you're screwed - Carello no longer exists, and the shelves are largely empty of replacements. Nobody 'yet' is offering a remanufactured replacement that looks identical to the Carello units..... M --- On Thu, 12/4/08, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 12:42 PM I'm not sure what older Benz models are considered "significant" beyond the obvious ones like the 300SLs, etc. But, they make parts for all of them, no matter what the model. Car collecting and restoration has become such a huge industry in the last 10 yrs...way more prolific than it was in the 1990s. The support industry is becoming more sophisticated as a result. I have no reason to think that such a large potential market such as 1980s/90s electronics would go untapped. BTW-the 456 Auto is a GM trans. The "special parts" are BS and can be made or modified. LS ________________________________ From: Michael James <cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 12:16:08 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Ferrari 'could' do the same thing - if there's a market for it, involving people with VERY deep pockets (Classique comes to mind). But we're not talking parts fabrication for 250 GTOs or special Boano coupes here, we're talking production cars with no historical value whatsoever. Until such production cars become 'rare' or 'significant', there's not going to be a huge run-up for preservation efforts. The dollar values, the market-driven need, etc. all have to be 'there' for things to happen. Some 'new' car owners are already in a pickle - try finding 456 GT transmission parts lying on a shelf somewhere. 'Homestyle' mechanical fab is easy, though. I'm saying, as the Electronics get more-and-more complex, and specialized for a particular car brand/model, its going to be harder and harder to repair or replace it. I think a lot of owners won't even bother to try. If Porsche's Tiptronic technology could be made to 'fit' into a Ferrari to replace an obsolete F1 Marelli component, then we're halfway there. But there's nothing on GM/Honda/Toyo/Benz parts shelf that could possibly be used as a substitute, let alone be used as a starting-point for a homemade fab. 'Classic' models like the 3-series Ferraris could always count on cross-referencing Bosch components with VW/Benz/Volvo/Porsche parts catalogs and finding those rare parts elsewhere under another name/part#....those days, I think, are gone. I attribute this to why so many cars from that era are still on the road today. M --- On Thu, 12/4/08, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) To: cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:48 AM The $300k was to build an entire car from scratch with custom bodywork, wheels, chassis, etc. The standalone engine management is much, much, much cheaper and will be even less so in 20 yrs. Benz has started manufacturing all of their vintage parts with super markups for old restorations to run the private parts suppliers out of business. Why wouldn't Ferrari do the same thing? LS ________________________________ From: Michael James <cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 8:52:40 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Agreed, but when it comes time to fix that F1 tranny in 20 years, I don't think there will be many owners who will pony-up anything close to $300K to fix or upgrade a 360 F1 to keep it going. In another ten years, the 360 will be lucky to maintain 20% of its original book-value. If the value to reverse-engineer something surpasses the total value of the car....the owner is screwed (or needs to be REALLY in-love with the machine) . Much of the Tranny's electronics are made by Magnetti Marelli - they're not well-known for keeping 'NOS' parts on the shelf forever. Then again, Ferrari and some of their OEM parts suppliers are probably scratching their heads over how many of their 'old cars' they thought would have disappeared long ago are being preserved and restored in quantities close to original production numbers. I know people who are fabricating small plastic parts in their own garage for vintage Ferraris...stuff that's been NLA for years....the Marque is enjoying a very loyal and dedicated fan base that considers NOTHING Ferrari-related to be disposable. Will this continue? Hey, I hope I'm wrong....the future will be interesting! M --- On Wed, 12/3/08, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 6:46 PM Jim, good to hear from you. Where have you been? I believe Michael James' concern was that as the modern cars like the 360 get older, the complex electronics would make restoration or maint impossible. When most of these cars need such a solution, they will probably be too old (over 20 yrs in some states) to need to be emissions compliant. The F355 will be eligible for antique tags in 6 yrs in my state! Not only will the E30 M3 be driven on the street legally, it will retain cats and will pass 1989 tailpipe standards! Although, in his area, he doesn't have to comply because the car will be exempt. They are doing it simply as a challenge. Regarding the motor...they were on the dyno last month with Dinan's new V10 stroker, 5.6 liters I believe. They will have 600bhp in a 2800lb E30 M3! He spent something like $30k for a new V10 motor just to tune and setup the Pectel mgmt. After 1 day of dyno testing by Pectel, it was trash and they threw the engine away. Onto engine #2... He has $300k into this whole project is not close to being done. There is so much custom bodywork, fabrication, and over the top detail work in the whole build. The next project is to redo one of the new M3s, throw away all of the factory crap and replace with real hardware. 700bhp turbo 5.6 V10, hidden rollcage, sequential Riccardo box, Comp dry sump-Accusump system, carbon sun visors, fire extinguisher on the A pillar, etc. Besides...emissions? Where's that male body spray? LS ----- Original Message ---- From: Jim Conforti <lndshrk [at] xmission.com> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 3:43:05 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) At 09:00 AM 12/3/2008 -0800, LS wrote: >A friend of mine is building an '89 E30 M3 with a 2008 BMW M5 v10 >drivetrain and suspension. Instead of cracking the factory ECU >programming, he trashed it and is having Dinan assist him with a >standalone Pectel unit to takeover everything. It was claimed that the >modern V10 BMW could not run without proprietary BMW ECU control. It is a >ridiculous amount of work, but he is pioneering it for the BMW world. It >is only the beginning. Of course said vehicle can NEVER be operated on any public highway in the USA. (Seriously) The chances of getting caught are low, but if he does - I hope he's got incredibly deep pockets because it's rather expensive fighting the US EPA in court. This, of course, is why you DON'T "trash" the factory ECU. ROFLMAO. JC _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/ _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/ _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday), (continued)
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Fellippe Galletta, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Michael James, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Hans E. Hansen, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Rick Lindsay, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.