Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: LtWacko (ltwacko![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:04:22 -0700 (PDT) |
EVERYONE noticed! Most if not all of the reviews stated Chevy would screw up the production version. My friends and I joked they probably had a production version ready that was a far cry from the concept version and had to "re-tool" due to the reaming of possibly screwing up.... LOL Anyway, I love the look too but I think it is a little "fat" along with the Challenger. Someone commented on the size of today's cars and that it's no wonder no one can build a car that weighs less than 3500 lbs. I mean if you are going to build an Accord sized Civic, call it an Accord. A "mid-sized" Hyundai with the interior room of a BMW 7-series. I don't need my Camry to out accelerate an "antique" Ferrari (that's for you Rick!) Bimmerphiles love the E30 but the closest thing is a pig of a 1-series. Great car but BMW lost it's way but I'm glad they are making money. Maybe the new MPG regs from the EPA will give us small, nimble cars again with "peppy" motors. I wouldn't mind a "modern" sub 3000 pound car that is desirable like BMW's, Porsches and Ferrari's of yore that don't cost more than my house. Rodney In a message dated 05/07/09 05:16:27 Central Daylight Time, ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com writes: Am I the only one who feels like GM has been teasing us with this car for years. Seems like its taken a heck of a long time for it to finally make the jump from the rags to the road. JIM
-
Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars LtWacko, May 7 2009
-
Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars Rick Lindsay, May 7 2009
-
Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars Hans E. Hansen, May 7 2009
- Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars Fellippe Galletta, May 7 2009
- Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars Mike Fleischer, May 7 2009
-
Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars Hans E. Hansen, May 7 2009
-
Re: NFC: Camaro and Fat cars Rick Lindsay, May 7 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.