Re: GM & Corvette NFC | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Tom Reynolds (kjtar![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 06:33:58 -0700 (PDT) |
If anyone can do it, Penske can. Hope he re-does the Sky and makes it a viable sports car. I like the looks of it better than the Solstice, but I think maybe I've seen 1 Sky and lots more of the Pontiac version around here. Saturn tried to take the Sky "upmarket" from the Solstice, with less than satisfactory results, I believe. Tom Tulsa ----- Original Message ----- From: "LarryT" <l02turner [at] comcast.net> To: <kjtar [at] cox.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 5:47 AM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] GM & Corvette NFC > Speaking of Penske, it looks like he is buying the Saturn side of GM along > with some friends... > > I hope his past successes translate to Saturn.... > > LarryT > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Rentiers" <rentiers [at] mac.com> > To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net> > Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 5:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] GM & Corvette NFC > > > > Never put beans in the chili if you drive a Smart. I thought Penske > > had the NAm franchise for those puppies wrapped up. > > > > As for the Corvette, this is the last year they will run LM GT1 at > > Sarthe next weekend. Plans are for them to come back in 2010 in LM > > GT2. That would put them up against Risi and the boys. > > > > Hope springs eternal :-) > > > > uncle ken > > http://www.lifeitsownself.com > > > > On Jun 4, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Jim Conforti wrote: > > > >> At 10:01 AM 6/4/2009, Michael James wrote: > >> > >>> If you saw a 'Smart' Car on a US Highway, then > >>> it passed the EPA/DOT minimum crash-safety > >>> standards prior to US importation by MB. > >> > >> It would be DOT/NHTSA (EPA has nothing to do w/ crash ratings) > >> > >> And when you look up the Smart ForTwo at NHTSA you find that > >> there are (curiously unstated) "safety concerns" > >> > >> To quote the IIHS at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr041409.html > >> > >> Laws of physics prevail: The Honda Fit, Smart > >> Fortwo, and Toyota Yaris are good performers in > >> the Institute's frontal offset barrier test, but > >> all three are poor performers in the frontal > >> collisions with midsize cars. These results > >> reflect the laws of the physical universe, > >> specifically principles related to force and distance. > >> > >> My comment: They were engineered to "pass the test". > >> > >> So if you happen to hit a concrete offset barrier at XYZ mph, you > >> should > >> be fine. If however you get hit or hit another vehicle - you > >> likely will > >> NOT be fine. > >> > >> further: > >> > >> Crash statistics confirm this. The death rate in > >> 1-3-year-old minicars in multiple-vehicle crashes > >> during 2007 was almost twice as high as the rate in very large cars. > >> > >> and: > >> > >> Mercedes C class versus Smart Fortwo: After > >> striking the front of the C class, the Smart went > >> airborne and turned around 450 degrees. This > >> contributed to excessive movement of the dummy > >> during rebound a dramatic indication of the > >> Smart's poor performance but not the only one. > >> There was extensive intrusion into the space > >> around the dummy from head to feet. The > >> instrument panel moved up and toward the dummy. > >> The steering wheel was displaced upward. Multiple > >> measures of injury likelihood, including those on > >> the dummy's head, were poor, as were measures on both legs. > >> > >> "The Smart is the smallest car we tested, so it's > >> not surprising that its performance looked worse > >> than the Fit's. Still both fall into the poor > >> category, and it's hard to distinguish between > >> poor and poorer," Lund says. "In both the Smart > >> and Fit, occupants would be subject to high > >> injury risk in crashes with heavier cars." In > >> contrast, the C class held up well, with little > >> to no intrusion into the occupant compartment. > >> Nearly all measures of injury likelihood were in the good range. > >> > >> Translation: Hope that hospital bed feels > >> comfy to you... or worse that casket. > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > >> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rentiers%40mail.com > >> > >> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > >> and F1 Headlines > >> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net > > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > > and F1 Headlines > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/kjtar%40cox.net > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > -- > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714 - Release Date: 3/8/07 >
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC, (continued)
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC Fellippe Galletta, June 6 2009
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC Ken Rentiers, June 4 2009
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC LarryT, June 4 2009
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC LarryT, June 7 2009
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC Tom Reynolds, June 7 2009
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC Brian E. Buxton, June 4 2009
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC Doug and Terri Anderson, June 5 2009
- Re: GM & Corvette NFC Hans E. Hansen, June 5 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.