Re: Politics - Not List Material | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Erik Nielsen (judge4re![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:49:53 -0800 (PST) |
It's all about cash flow for the biotech to keep going and pharma getting something more than a powerpoint presentation on a concept. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Martin Stark <MStark [at] copper.net> wrote: > What frequently happens when a drug is developed by a biotech company is > that following one or more successful phase 2 trials the biotech will > partner with a pharmo company for the much larger and very expensive phase 3 > trial(s). The biotech gets funding to go forward (and a possible future > royalty) and in return the pharmo gets some degree of market exclusivity > should the drug get to the NDA (new drug application) stage and be approved. > > Erik Nielsen wrote: > > When I teach chemical engineering design, the number I use is $880MM > and 15-16 years to bring a drug to market. Failure rates are in the > 90% range. > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:59 AM, LarryT <l02turner [at] comcast.net> wrote: > > > Along those same lines Merck recently commercialized a drug that controls a > fungal infection. World wide there were a couple dozen cases - and many > were fatal. Merck had scientist and engineers, etc. working on a drug for > 10+ years. All of that time and money spent (roughly $120k/ scientist/engr > involved for 10 years with no ROI and no guarantee there would ever be a > ROI. Yet they spent the money and found a drug - because even though the > people affected was incredibly small given the world population those who > needed a cure welcomed their studies and eventual success. > > Sure, it was expensive, but if you owned shares of Merck would you want > them giving money away? When you rail against a corporation making money > you are really railing against millions of retired teachers, firemen and > clerks who have their retirement income pinned to their mutual funds making > money so they can pay a dividend and granny will be able to buy groceries > this week. When a corporation makes money the investors make money - the > corp keeps some for salaries, R&D, capital and expense but there's no big > account marked Profit. The profit goes to the investors - something all > anti-business liberals ignore. > > LarryT > > OilAnalysis Time? > Looking for Weber Parts or Porsche Posters? > www.youroil.net > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Jim Conforti" <lndshrk [at] xmission.com> > Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 4:52 PM > To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net> > Cc: "Ferrari List" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Politics - Not List Material > > > > Michael James wrote: > > > Polio wasn't eradicated by Pfizer. Ever wonder why we have half-a-dozen > pills on the market to cure Erectile Dysfunction in this country, but no > cure for AIDS? > > > Let's see - because AIDS - despite the ridiculous amounts of money > spent on it to date - has not been "cured" - by all of the researchers > who search for a "cure". > > TENS of BILLIONS of DOLLARS are spent on HIV research annually. > > IMNSHO to the detriment of every other medical condition there is. > > Sorry - not going to blame "private industry" here. > > Or Cancer? > > Many types of cancer CAN be cured. Many cannot. > > There is no one CANCER. > > Couldn't that private-industry investment > > > for the development of Viagra have been better-spent on more worthwhile > medical pursuits that better-support the goodness and health of the > greater society? > > > What gives you the right to tell me where my dollars should go? > > Or some company? > > That's called THEFT - or INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE. > > That aside, your hate for capitalism and the success it brings, shows > loud and clear, COMRADE. > > Do you know how Viagra was found? > > They weren't looking for PENIS PILLS. > > They were researching drugs TO TREAT HYPERTENSION (Blood Pressure), > ANGINA, and Blood Clots - researching a group of drugs called > phosphodiesterase inhibitors. > > It was a serendipitous discovery. They were going to discard it and move > onto the next drug when they found out it helped w/ erections. > > Voila - now old guys can get it on, and old ladies don't have to cheat > with > the pool boy or gardener anymore... WIN/WIN! > > Unlike (for example) the discovery of Zanamivir - aka RELENZA. > > Which was designed by computational chemistry (my specialty, btw!) to > be a neuraminidase inhibitor - something that prevents the influenza > virus from replicating via infection of healthy cells. > > Both cases of industry spending MONEY to find a cure for a disease. > > Guess what - private-industry doesn't give a DAMN > > > about such things. Let's not kid ourselves here - this isn't the 1950s > anymore. Business 'ethics' and 'values' have deteriorated from what > they once were to ONLY THE BOTTOM LINE MATTERS. Quick, short-term > profits by any means necessary. > > > Really? > > Here we go with the anti-capitalism/pro-socialism fantasies. > > Viagra was discovered by accident while researchers were looking for real > cures for REAL diseases. Zanamivir was discovered intentionally as a > cure > for a REAL disease. > > Gee, that blows your theories right out of the water, doesn't it COMRADE? > > As usual. > > Suggestion: Quit while you're ahead. > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/judge4re%40gmail.com > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/mstark%40copper.net > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >
- Re: Politics - Not List Material, (continued)
- Re: Politics - Not List Material Jim Conforti, November 14 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material LarryT, November 15 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material Erik Nielsen, November 15 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material Martin Stark, November 15 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material Erik Nielsen, November 15 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material LarryT, November 15 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material Ken Rentiers, November 15 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material - Developing New Drugs & Med Devices LarryT, November 15 2009
- Re: Politics - Not List Material Ken Rentiers, November 13 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.