Re: Politics - Not List Material
From: Ken Rentiers (rentiersme.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:43:01 -0800 (PST)

On Nov 14, 2009, at 12:20 AM, Michael James wrote:

I would agree with this, in-part, if you didn't equate 'being healthy' with a LUXURY. So not-dying from Polio or the Swine Flu ranks up there with buying a Porsche, in your view? If you can't afford something, you deserve to DIE? And you wonder why the NeoCons have an image and 'values' problem.....

Next, you're going to tell me Jesus was wrong, too. We are NOT our Brother's keeper. Gotcha. "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness - for the Upper-Class and GOP Members Only" That's catchy - Sarah Palin should run with that.

Leaving Jesus aside, nothing is more wrong-headed than insisting that health care is a "right".

Rights are defined as those natural prerogatives, God-given if you will, which accrue to any man. Being bestowed by God, they cannot be constrained by government. We all know the litany - Freedom of Speech etc. But your freedom to speak does not imply my mandatory attention to your thesis.

The rights of individuals are constrained by the equal rights of others. Your right to wave your arms to amplify the point you are making ends one inch from my nose. The plantation owner has no right to demand his cotton be picked unwillingly, and without just compensation, by others.

How then does one individual, or group of individuals, have the right to demand others give up the hours of their lives unwillingly and without negotiation to provide them with health care?

If your health care is a right, so then is picking my cotton.

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.