Re: German Cars | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Michael James (cavallino_rapante![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:08:08 -0800 (PST) |
I can understand that sentiment, however.....seems as though you've set yourself up for failure. An M3 isn't even a consideration for me, as I regard the motor as too 'high-strung' to be dependable for daily-commuter use. And I have never heard anything positive regarding the reliability of Audis, especially the modern models - too many 'bells and whistles'...they're not a consideration either, none of my friends who own them will recommend them to me. Is there a significant correlation between the higher-performance models, and the amount of service/lack of reliability? I think so - someone mentioned Brabus in an earlier post. Brabus might be a great road-rocket, but....haven't you just turned a reliable/dependable machine into a fire-breathing hand grenade for an extra $60K+? M --- On Wed, 12/23/09, Martin Stark <MStark [at] Copper.net> wrote: From: Martin Stark <MStark [at] Copper.net> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] German Cars To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 10:53 AM Good luck finding any German car that can run 100K miles trouble free. I and my immediate family members have owned upwards of 10 cars from Audi, MB, and BMW, and currently own an A8 and M3. Trouble free is not a phrase that can be associated with any of them - past or present. Michael James wrote: >I was hoping of getting-into a German car in the next month or two - I >actually like the MB C280 4Matic or a 5-speed manual 3-Series BMW. I think >either car would be practical and a good 'snow-car' with Blizzacks on the >rims. I'm not looking to 'make statements' per se, or drive a land-yaht (I >don't know any fat people who need seat-space defined in cubic yards) - I just >want a 4-door car that is well-built, great in the snow, some Cache', some >modern/modest luxury, and can run for 100K miles trouble-free. I'm finding >LOTS of C280s and 3-Series BMWs with sub-30K miles for around $20K, cars that >would appear to be leased vehicles that were gently-used. > >Keep in mind, my 'current' car is a 1996 stripped Ford Ranger with 250,000+ >miles on it. A five-year-old Honda would be luxurious in comparison - I'm not >a 'bells-and-whistles' guy. If the heater and A/C work, and there's a radio, >I'm pretty happy. > >M > >P.S. - the Head work on my 308 is going well, I should have those finished in >January. The Transfer Case and associated bearings will also be done by >spring. Having a great deal of difficulty finding the correct Cylinder Liners >at an affordable price, though. > > > > >--- On Wed, 12/23/09, TheMightyToe <themightytoe [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > >From: TheMightyToe <themightytoe [at] gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Michael Schumacher >To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> >Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> >Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 10:02 AM > > >KR says: >But fear not; the German cars have video cameras to use backing up until >mirrors are invented. They have vibrators in the steering wheel that chide you >when you prove incapable of staying in your lane. They have forward-looking >xray lasers to part the waters when the road floods. And the tires are good >for 10,000 miles. Unless you get the run-flat option which rides like >Flintstone Rocktreads and cannot be fixed when punctured. > >Ken, you do realize that these exact "advances" are specifically >targetting the Houston area driver? Flat perfect roads, occasional >floods mixed with year round perfect conditions, and the worst >collective driving ability on the planet? Seriously last time I drove >there I saw some poor bastard on a Harley get taken out by a lady in an >SUV on her cell phone, leaving a tollbooth. Last time I saw something >that horrible was on trip to India (where I imagine driver training is >marginally better than Houston's). > >But on BMW's I agree, that company jumped the Shark back in 2000. My >E46 M3 was probably my last BMW, they just don't make a cool car >anymore. MB has never appealed to me in any way, not even their >"classics" which are below any standard set by their contemporaries in >both looks and performance. Who wants a car that lasts forever if its >hideous and you have to look at it forever? They drive very solidly, >but have no soul whatsoever and really belong only in the hands of a >retiree. Porsche and Audi are about the only German car companies >making interesting rides these days (I do like my VW GTI a lot, but it >is a standout for VW's line of cars I think). > >Now here is something I pondered a few nights ago at the movie >theaters... They played an add for Kia, and the ad was not for a car >but for the company. The pitch was how great and modern their >manufacturing plant in the southern US was and how it provided jobs for >American workers... So if I analyze this? What they are actually >saying is it is cheaper for them to make cars in the deep south of the >US than in Korea? Wow. Just wow and how sad for us to be practically a >third world country in many respects... > >That said, a neighbor of mine has a Hyundai Genesis Sedan, and it is >every bit as nice as a Merc S class. Even looks like one a bit. > >Now what I really do not get, is how ANY car company could link F1 to >their product line? When have we seen any F1 tech in a Mercedes if >ever? Or a Renault, or a Toyota road car? > >BR, >Mike > > >Ken Rentiers wrote: > > >>Fellippe always enjoy your messages, but I have to disagree with this one. >> >>It's certainly true that many of the old garden variety Benz's were slow, and >>about as exciting to drive as, well, a bank vault which is what they were >>built like. It is also true that many of the latest iteration of MB and BMW >>products are crap. >> >>Due to the pressures of the Deutschland greenies much of the current BMW line >>is now made of recycled plastic. This includes the radiator. Given enough >>heat/cool cycles (oh say 50,000 miles worth) the eco-plastic becomes as >>brittle as the peanut variety of same, and cracks. Usually at the most >>inopportune time, giving you about 30 seconds to shut down before the head >>warps. >> >>Did I mention they were as ugly as moose butts? Did I mention they had no >>dipsticks? Onliest way you can check the oil level is to drain it out and >>measure it! >> >>Crap. Idiocy. Obergruppenarrogance! >> >>But fear not; the German cars have video cameras to use backing up until >>mirrors are invented. They have vibrators in the steering wheel that chide >>you when you prove incapable of staying in your lane. They have >>forward-looking xray lasers to part the waters when the road floods. And the >>tires are good for 10,000 miles. Unless you get the run-flat option which >>rides like Flintstone Rocktreads and cannot be fixed when punctured. >> >>Crap!!! - gimme the older, simpler cars that you drove instead of rode in. >>The ones without bulbous snouts to meet new Euro-regs about not hitting below >>the pedestrians' knees. Like the ugly new 5 series. Don't cry for me >>Pininfarina - I got some nice old iron I shall keep forever. >> >>Screw progress and while I'm at it HUMBUG! >> >>Except for you Fellippe - you're a good guy even if you do latch on to a >>little misdirected opinion at times. My best to you and yours and have a >>wonderful Christmas. All the rest of you too, except those taken in by the >>Hollywood crap machine now showing "Eco-smurfs v The US Marines" (Avatar). >>##$%^&* tree-hugging commies every one of them. >> >>:-) >>love and kisses >>the kenverine >> >> >>On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Fellippe Galletta wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:46 AM, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Roger that...before they became plastic toasters? >>>> >>>>I'll take a 190E 2.3 16v and an AMG Hammer. >>>> >>>>LS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Oh man. >>> >>>With some of you guys on here, it's like every civilian brand needs to >>>maintain a 250 GTO like aura around their cars....ugh. >>> >>>Sure, MB of new isn't quite like MB of old but who seriously wants a 190E >>>over a new E, S, CL, CLK, SL or CLS? LOL. >>> >>>A vintage Gullwing is a different story of course, and a genuine AMG Hammer >>>or Porsche built E500 is worthy of consideration, but not all garden >>>variety Benzes made between 1980-1999. You seriously want bulletproof, buy a >>>new Japanese car...done, end of story. >>> >>>I'll play along and be a good sport and say the '90s S Class was the last of >>>the uber Mercedes Benz elite class. When comparing each respective >>>generation of S, this was easily the best, from the look, the armored car >>>like construction, those dual pane windows, and the first big HP V12 in the >>>600...the quintessential Benz. >>> >>>Still wouldn't get it over the newer S's. You're buying an >>>expensive prestige sedan for the cachet/style/keeping up with the >>>joneses/etc first, everything else comes second. Anyone who says otherwise >>>is clearly lying to himself or others! >>> >>>The '90s S or Miami Vice era S's no longer fit the bill....so no point in >>>owning these maintenance nightmares unless it's for the novelty factor and >>>short term. For that LS, you did it right with those BMWs! >>> >>>It's time to expose the (forty) 800 pound gorilla for what it is! I don't >>>hate those older Benzes...still respect them....but to act like they were >>>the only good cars from the factory is silly. >>> >>>FG >>>_________________________________________________________________ >>>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >>>http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rentiers%40mail.com >>> >>>Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >>>and F1 Headlines >>>http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >>http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/themightytoe%40gmail.com >> >>Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >>and F1 Headlines >>http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> >> >> > >_________________________________________________________________ >To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com > >Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >and F1 Headlines >http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/mstark%40copper.net > >Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >and F1 Headlines >http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Michael Schumacher, (continued)
- Re: Michael Schumacher Ken Rentiers, December 23 2009
- Re: Some No.... Michael Schumacher philville dejazzd.com, December 23 2009
- Re: German Cars Michael James, December 23 2009
- Re: German Cars Martin Stark, December 23 2009
- Re: German Cars Michael James, December 23 2009
- Re: German Cars Martin Stark, December 23 2009
- Re: German Cars Michael James, December 23 2009
- Re: German Cars Martin Stark, December 23 2009
- Re: German Cars Erik Nielsen, December 23 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.