Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Doug and Terri Anderson (dnt![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:18:17 -0700 (PDT) |
Ah ah ah – good one Scottie Thus leaving Option 3b in effect
When I was a photog during the CanAm
series, I saw plenty of cars a) blow original engine; or, b) blow original
tranny; or, c) destroy body work all of which was either replaced on the spot
(I had Bruce McLarens RF fender from his massive lap 1, turn 1 shunt). So with 40 to 45 year old photographic evidence
of such all in a racers day of racing and no intent of fraud was made – they
needed to replace to go racing. Now comes the future – year 2011.
And YESH ladies and Gentlemen – this totally restored (as if there was ANY
original part left after two hard seasons of racing and untold years of
secondary and tertiary racing market ) is an original unmolested Phutney Cheech
CanAm 7 liter race car. Old race cars are similar to my
grandmothers knife she was so proud of – it had been in the family since
she was a baby in Oslo Norway – other than the blade had been replaced
three times and the handle only twice – this knife was nearly a hundred
years old. Like the joke about the concours where ALL
39 Series I, Series II and Series I to II Ferrari GTO’s were invited and
47 showed up. Onward. DOUG Fortunately, Ferrari Classich reduced the
fraudulent 47 number to 43. *sigh* From: Scott Saidel [mailto:Ferrarisimo [at] comcast.net] Option 4: Sometime during its life, this car acquired a
non-number matching engine. Some enterprising restorer / owner took out a
set of number blocks and a hammer, and "fixed" the problem. Just saying, it happens. Scottie On Oct 20, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Doug and Terri Anderson
wrote:
Re-stamp? Hmmmm – please
unveil the “re-stamp” authorization steps to us hoi-poli. Is
it one of the following or another story all together?
Some time ago I saw frame C001 which to me
looked like C003 over stamp. Tell me it ain’t so Joe. DOUG If I were collecting coins – and I
had my well worn 1909 S VDB turned over to the mint and re-struck as an MS 65,
well, that would seem quite bazaar. Where does Classich stop? They do
the motor – do they do a frame? A trans axel? Sheeeet man,
gimmie a brand new Barcetta, well, for a George Soros pay check. But
service with a smile. From: Brian E. Buxton [mailto: If the car passed a Classiche inspection (which I
thought the cars had to physically go back to Ferrari, or to a dealer where a Classiche
employee could fly in and view it), then how is what you've just sent
possible? Even if it is as re-stamp, if it passes Classiche as correct
for the car then it's correct ... There has been new
information on Chassis# 2639, making the broker scam small potatoes to anyone
serious about Ferrari, and its marque. This car was reportedly sold for $4.1
million to a trusting person believing the car was authentic, matching number
250GT SWB Berlinetti, when in fact the engine is an overstamp repro. I would
like to speak with the person who bought this car, Chassis #2639, Please
contact me. The seller (Broker) not the owner, of this car has a long list of
corruption/ fraud/decept of High End Rare Vintage Ferrari's in Douglas S. Le Grand
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/brianbuxton%40buxtonmotorsports.com
Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-- <image001.jpg> _________________________________________________________________ |
-
Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Douglas Le Grand, October 20 2011
-
Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Brian E. Buxton, October 20 2011
-
Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Doug and Terri Anderson, October 20 2011
- Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Scott Saidel, October 20 2011
- Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Doug and Terri Anderson, October 20 2011
-
Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Doug and Terri Anderson, October 20 2011
-
Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Brian E. Buxton, October 20 2011
-
Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Carl Jones, October 20 2011
- Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. judge4re, October 20 2011
- Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. clyderomerof4, October 20 2011
- Re: Ferrari 250 GT SWB Chassis# 2639 , from bad to worst. Brian E. Buxton, October 20 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.