Re: let the debate begin | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Barry (u2fast![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:35:19 -0800 (PST) |
Clyde asked do we need assault rifles? I ask, do we need 100 plus mph cars? In the hands of a responsible person, it isn't a problem. Either in the hands of a madman are dangerous. As for the Neanderthal redneck comment, oh well. We will just agree to disagree. The problem with guns is pandoras box is open. No different then drugs. They are illegal, but can be found everywhere. Guns are illegal in Mexico, we know how that's working out. Are we saying you should be able to own any weapon you choose. No. Society as a mass will make that decision. I see no need for a thirty round clip. But a semiautomatic rifle is a semiautomatic rifle no matter if it is brown or black with a military look. Shoots just the same. I think the problem is deeper then guns. All, are darn near all of the crazed shooters of late were mentally ill and on anti depression medication. I'm not saying the meds are to blame either. I'm just saying the problem is more complicated then a black gun. I will say this though, if his mom knew he was mentally ill, the guns should be locked away. Whew, my 2cents from a list lurker. Barry
- Re: let the debate begin, (continued)
- Re: let the debate begin cjromero, December 22 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Rick Moseley, December 22 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Doug and Terri Anderson, December 22 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Adam Green, December 22 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Barry, December 22 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Martin Stark, December 22 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Paul K Rentiers, December 23 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Adam Green, December 23 2012
- Re: let the debate begin Peter Pless, December 23 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.