Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin
From: cjromero (clyderomerof4bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:06:39 -0800 (PST)
Thanks Paul for that explanation 
You are very knowledgable on the subject 
And you are correct 
Clyde 

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 23, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Paul K Rentiers <rentiers [at] mail.com> wrote:

Define âassault rifleââ
Uhâ
Yeah. Thatâs the problem. The term assault rifle gets bandied around a lot. Politically, the term is a loaded nonsense one that was created back during the Clinton years. It was one of those tricks where you name legislation something catchy, like PATRIOT Act. (another law rammed through while emotions were high and nobody was thinking, go figure).
To gun experts, an assault rifle is a very specific type of weapon which originated (for the most part) in the 1940s. It is a magazine fed, select fire (meaning capable of full auto), intermediate cartridge (as in, actually not that powerful, but Iâll come back to that later) infantry weapon.
The thing is, real assault rifles in the US have been heavily regulated since before they were invented. The thing that the media and politicians like to refer to as assault rifles is basically a catch all term for any gun which looks scary.
I had somebody get all mad at me for pointing this out, because they said that the term had entered common usage. Okayâ If youâre going to legislate it, DEFINE IT.
And then comes up that pesky problem. The US banned assault rifles once before for a decade and the law did absolutely nothing. I mean, it was totally, literally pointless. The special commission to study it said that it accomplished absolutely nothing. (except tick a bunch of Americans off, and as a result we bought a TON more guns) And the reason was that since assault weapon is a nonsense term, they just came up with a list of arbitrary features which made a gun into an assault weapon.
Problem was, none of these features actually made the gun functionally any different or somehow more lethal or better from any other run of the mill firearm. Most of the criteria were so silly that they became a huge joke to gun owners, except of course, for that part where many law abiding citizens accidentally became instant felons because one of their guns had some cosmetic feature which was now illegal.
One of the criteria was that it was semi-automatic. See above. Hard to ban the single most common and readily available type of gun in the world. (unless you believe in confiscation, but Iâll get to that). Then what if it takes a detachable magazine! Thatâs got to be an Evil Feature. And yes, we really did call the Evil Features. Iâll talk about magazines below, but once again, it is pretty hard to ban something that common unless you want to go on a confiscatory national suicide mission.
For example, flash hiders sound dangerous. Letâs say having a flash hider makes a gun an assault weapon. So flash hiders became an evil feature. Problem is flash hiders donât do much. They screw onto the end of your muzzle and divert the flash off to the side instead of straight up so it isnât as annoying when you shoot. It doesnât actually hide the flash from anybody else. EVIL.
Barrel shrouds were listed. Barrel shrouds are basically useless, cosmetic pieces of metal that go over the barrel so you donât accidentally touch it and burn your hand. But they became an instantaneous felony too. Collapsible stocks make it so you can adjust your rifle to different size shooters, that way a tall guy and his short wife can shoot the same gun. Nope. EVIL FEATURE!
It has been a running joke in the gun community ever since the ban passed. When Carolyn McCarthy was asked by a reporter what a barrel shroud was, she replied âI think it is the shoulder thing which goes up.â  Oh good. Iâm glad that thousands of law abiding Americans unwittingly committed felonies because they had a cosmetic piece of sheet metal on their barrel, which has no bearing whatsoever on crime, but could possibly be a shoulder thing which goes up.
Now are you starting to see why âassault weaponsâ is a pointless term? They arenât functionally any more powerful or deadly than any normal gun. In fact the cartridges they normally fire are far less powerful than your average deer hunting rifle. Donât worry though, because the same people who fling around the term assault weapons also think of scoped deer rifles as âhigh powered sniper gunsâ.
Basically, what you are thinking of as assault weapons arenât special.


On Dec 22, 2012, at 7:17 PM, cjromero <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:

Lets go with the NRA definition
Ok

Or if you want any type of military type weapon that has been civilianized

Your call

Clyde

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 22, 2012, at 5:51 PM, "rtpetrick" <rtpetrick [at] comcast.net> wrote:

Clyde,
Please define "Assault Weapon".

Regards
Feliz Navidad
Prospero Ano y Felicidad

-----Original Message-----
From: ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com
[mailto:ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:34 PM
To: rtpetrick [at] comcast.net
Subject: Ferrari Digest, Vol 77, Issue 10

Send Ferrari mailing list submissions to
  ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
  http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
  ferrari-owner [at] ferrarilist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Ferrari digest..."


Today's Topics:

 1. let the debate begin (cjromero)
 2. Re: let the debate begin (Steven Noble)
 3. Re: let the debate begin (Rick Moseley)
 4. Re: let the debate begin (Doug and Terri Anderson)
 5. Re: let the debate begin (cjromero)
 6. Re: let the debate begin Was Guns now Roman Gladius
    (Robert W. Garven Jr.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:58:37 -0500
From: "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
Subject: [Ferrari] let the debate begin
To: "'The FerrariList'" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Message-ID: <000001cde08f$7f7bb010$7e731030$ [at] net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons?

And for those who hunt can you hunt at night?



Standby I am going BURNERS ANGELS 50!!



Clyde Romero



just the right amount of wrong!



"SCARS ARE TATTOOS WITH BETTER STORIES"

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521,
and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and
may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is
prohibited.

If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended
recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium
please so advise the sender immediately.

Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability
for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a
result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20121222/d365ac49
/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:03:40 -0800
From: Steven Noble <snoble [at] sonn.com>
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] let the debate begin
To: "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Message-ID: <EA574821-9FD6-443B-B13C-0ECC370D418E [at] sonn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

A weapon would have to be pretty light to not be usable to assault someone
with it.

On Dec 22, 2012, at 1:58 PM, "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:

Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons?
And for those who hunt can you hunt at night?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20121222/b516701a
/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:19:36 -0800
From: Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] let the debate begin
To: cjromero <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Message-ID: <F8DB9F9A-B2E5-4E96-A908-BE48AFD9DA1E [at] pacbell.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I have no problems with any weapons.  I have a problem with idiots owning
them.   Now how do we keep psychos from getting them.  And no, I don't think
taking them away from everyone is an acceptable answer.

Rick




On Dec 22, 2012, at 1:58 PM, "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:

Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons?
And for those who hunt can you hunt at night?

Standby I am going BURNERS ANGELS 50!!

Clyde Romero

just the right amount of wrong!

"SCARS ARE TATTOOS WITH BETTER STORIES"
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521,
and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and
may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is
prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail
and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended
recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium
please so advise the sender immediately.
Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability
for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a
result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.


_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ramosel%40pacbell
.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20121222/1fdd0506
/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:29:57 -0800
From: "Doug and Terri Anderson" <dnt [at] dock.net>
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] let the debate begin
To: "'Rick Moseley'" <ramosel [at] pacbell.net>
Cc: 'The FerrariList' <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Message-ID: <3B0D21A5B31F49ACBFE2699329CC0AD6 [at] dougpc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Rick ask the rhetorical question - "Now how do we keep psychos from
getting them[weapons]?"



Simplistic answer (which - for our radio land audience does NOT mean really
simple) is get rid of ACLU and understand the larger our population becomes
the larger the nutzo population becomes.

Alas

DOUG



_____  

From: Rick Moseley [mailto:ramosel [at] pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 2:20 PM
To: DOUG
Cc: The FerrariList
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] let the debate begin



I have no problems with any weapons.  I have a problem with idiots owning
them.   Now how do we keep psychos from getting them.  And no, I don't think
taking them away from everyone is an acceptable answer.



Rick






On Dec 22, 2012, at 1:58 PM, "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:

Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons?

And for those who hunt can you hunt at night?



Standby I am going BURNERS ANGELS 50!!



Clyde Romero



just the right amount of wrong!



"SCARS ARE TATTOOS WITH BETTER STORIES"

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521,
and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and
may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is
prohibited.

If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended
recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium
please so advise the sender immediately.

Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability
for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a
result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.





_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ramosel%40pacbell.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20121222/f83bdf7a
/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:32:34 -0500
From: cjromero <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] let the debate begin
To: Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Message-ID: <E29E689F-85CE-4CD3-A14F-47A0C74F536B [at] bellsouth.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

So you should be able to buy an
Apache Helicopter ?

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 22, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net> wrote:

I have no problems with any weapons.  I have a problem with idiots owning
them.   Now how do we keep psychos from getting them.  And no, I don't think
taking them away from everyone is an acceptable answer.

Rick




On Dec 22, 2012, at 1:58 PM, "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
wrote:

Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons?
And for those who hunt can you hunt at night?

Standby I am going BURNERS ANGELS 50!!

Clyde Romero

just the right amount of wrong!

"SCARS ARE TATTOOS WITH BETTER STORIES"
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521,
and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and
may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is
prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail
and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended
recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium
please so advise the sender immediately.
Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability
for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a
result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.


_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ramosel%40pacbel
l.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomerof4%40b
ellsouth.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20121222/d178d3cb
/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:34:03 -0800
From: "Robert W. Garven Jr." <rgarven [at] gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] let the debate begin Was Guns now Roman Gladius
To: cjromero romero <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>,    The FerrariList
  <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Message-ID: <4AABF9B8-DE64-4722-84EC-9EAAF4797D83 [at] gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Friends,

I think guns are for p****** here is how I settle my disputes!  :-P And you
would be surprised at how many dispute erupt when you show up in a 100AD
period red miniskirt! Plus the associated armour scratches the leather in
the ferrari so you have to take the charriot. You have to get a friend hold
the chariot while you hook up the horses, did you know this was before they
had brakes! Ask Ben Hur its a real pain in the ass!!!

Clyde aren't you one of the the armed pilots? After the Glock debate can we
get back to little ricky!


Robert W. Garven Jr.
rgarven [at] gmail.com


"The Ferrari is a dream - people dream of owning this special vehicle and
for most people it will remain a dream apart from for those lucky few." Enzo
Ferrari






On Dec 22, 2012, at 1:58 PM, cjromero wrote:

Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons?
And for those who hunt can you hunt at night?

Standby I am going BURNERS ANGELS 50!!

Clyde Romero

just the right amount of wrong!

"SCARS ARE TATTOOS WITH BETTER STORIES"
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521,
and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and
may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is
prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended
recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium
please so advise the sender immediately.
Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability
for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a
result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.


_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rgarven%40gmail.com

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20121222/a97ae162
/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Rome.jpg
Type: image/jpg
Size: 143985 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20121222/a97ae162
/attachment.jpg

------------------------------

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari


End of Ferrari Digest, Vol 77, Issue 10
***************************************

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomerof4%40bellsouth.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rentiers%40mail.com

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.