Ferrari Mailing List: Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin

[rtpetrick (rtpetrick]

Lo mismo para usted, mi amigo....!

Regards
Feliz Navidad 
Prospero Ano y Felicidad

-----Original Message-----
From: cjromero [mailto:clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net] 
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 4:03 PM
To: rtpetrick
Cc: The FerrariList
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Clyde:Let the debate begin

Gentlemen this has been a great debate it was civil and very informative
from my point of view It truly shows the diversity of this list and this
country I might add I realize I got the juices flowing in some of you and
that's a good thing!

Happy holidays to all and lets use the list not only to learn about our
wonderful cars and love for them But also to express our thoughts as
gentlemen about issues that effect us all!  

All the best gentlemen 

Clyde
In a low yo to !


Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 23, 2012, at 12:44 PM, "rtpetrick" <rtpetrick [at] comcast.net> wrote:

> Clyde, 
> Please consider:
> 
> http://www.nraila.org/glossary.aspx
> From the NRA-ILA glossary..
> 
> ASSAULT RIFLE
> By U.S. Army definition, a selective-fire rifle chambered for a cartridge
of
> intermediate power. If applied to any semi-automatic firearm regardless of
> its cosmetic similarity to a true assault rifle, the term is incorrect.
> ASSAULT WEAPON
> Any weapon used in an assault (see WEAPON).
> WEAPON
> Webster defines it as "an instrument of offensive or defensive combat."
Thus
> an automobile, baseball bat, bottle, chair, firearm, fist, pen knife or
> shovel is a "weapon," if so used.
> 
> You suggest that we use the NRA definition of assault weapon, which is
O.K.
> with me. 
> 
> And so to your question: Who on the list still thinks we need assault
> weapons? If we use the NRA definition of Assault Weapon, then by
definition,
> a Ferrari could be considered an assault weapon, if it is used as an
> instrument of offensive or defensive combat. Then the question could be
> changed to: Who on the list still thinks we need Ferraris? Conversely, if
a
> civilized AR-15 is used for target shooting, and not as an instrument of
> offensive or defensive combat, then by definition, it must NOT be an
assault
> weapon. 
> 
> To me, the issue is not about need.....it is about rights.....it is about
> political power and therefore votes.....it is about increasing government
> control......and......it is about loss of individual liberty.  
> 
> An armed law-abiding person is a CITIZEN! A disarmed law-abiding person is
a
> SUBJECT! 
> For those who understand this distinction, no explanation is necessary.
For
> those who do not understand this distinction, no explanation is possible.
> 
> Regards
> Feliz Navidad 
> Prospero Ano y Felicidad
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cjromero [mailto:clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:18 PM
> To: rtpetrick
> Cc: The FerrariList
> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Clyde:Let the debate begin
> 
> Lets go with the NRA definition
> Ok 
> 
> Or if you want any type of military type weapon that has been civilianized

> 
> Your call
> 
> Clyde 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Dec 22, 2012, at 5:51 PM, "rtpetrick" <rtpetrick [at] comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Clyde,
>> Please define "Assault Weapon".
>> 
>> Regards
>> Feliz Navidad
>> Prospero Ano y Felicidad
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com
>> [mailto:ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:34 PM
>> To: rtpetrick [at] comcast.net
>> Subject: Ferrari Digest, Vol 77, Issue 10
>> 
>> Send Ferrari mailing list submissions to
>>   ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>   http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>   ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>   ferrari-owner [at] ferrarilist.com
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
>> than
>> "Re: Contents of Ferrari digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>  1. let the debate begin (cjromero)
>>  2. Re: let the debate begin (Steven Noble)
>>  3. Re: let the debate begin (Rick Moseley)
>>  4. Re: let the debate begin (Doug and Terri Anderson)
>>  5. Re: let the debate begin (cjromero)
>>  6. Re: let the debate begin Was Guns now Roman Gladius
>>     (Robert W. Garven Jr.)
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:58:37 -0500
>> From: "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
>> Subject: [Ferrari] let the debate begin
>> To: "'The FerrariList'" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>> Message-ID: <000001cde08f$7f7bb010$7e731030$ [at] net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> 
>> Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons?
>> 
>> And for those who hunt can you hunt at night?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Standby I am going BURNERS ANGELS 50!!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Clyde Romero
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> just the right amount of wrong!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> "SCARS ARE TATTOOS WITH BETTER STORIES"
>> 
>