Re: MB Engine Advantage | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Todd Walke (racertod![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:22:12 -0700 (PDT) |
Paul wrote:
Anyone else believe the Mercedes dual turbo system gives their car a half second advantage over the field? If anyone missed the bit about dual turbos, it's my understanding that a genius at MB attacked the turbo lag problem by choosing two shaft driven half size turbos mounted at front/rear of the engine. Half the weight does wonders for momentum as they will spool up twice as fast as one heavier turbo.
The regulations specify a single turbo only.A typical turbocharger has the turbine (driven by the exhaust) and the compressor (that compresses the air) in a single housing.
What Mercedes has done is to put the compressor at the front of the engine and the turbine at the rear. A shaft connects the two, with an electric motor (the MGU-H) on the shaft as well. This allows a shorter intake path, which reduces lag. And not having the intake plumbing at the rear of the motor improves packaging around the rear of the engine. Since engine development is limited, it'll be difficult for other engine manufacturers to duplicate this arrangement.
Todd Seattle,WA '86 GTI, Red of course. (exciting racey car) 276,000 miles '01 Golf TDI, silver. (new work car) 459,000 miles'87 Golf, Polar Silver. (retired work car) 654,000 miles <- Gone to a new home :(
http://www.pureluckdesign.com <-Ferrari & VW stuff
-
MB Engine Advantage pbennett, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Doug & Terri, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Todd Walke, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Rick Moseley, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Doug & Terri, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage pbennett, April 21 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Pat Scopelliti, April 20 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.