Re: MB Engine Advantage
From: pbennett (pbennettPaul-Bennett.com)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Todd, Thanks for the clarification on the details, I mistook dual turbines for dual turbos. Apparently separating in/out turbines allows for using smaller diameter turbines due to the heat advantage allowing for a smaller intercooler.

OK then Marco, as the new guy at Ferrari, perhaps you can arrange to buy MB engines for the F14-T and give Alonso an even playing field. That half second MB engine advantage can't be overcome with a fancy new wing design or more enthusiasm.

__________________________________________

a genius at MB attacked the turbo lag problem by choosing two shaft driven
half size turbos mounted at front/rear of the engine. Half the weight does
wonders for momentum as they will spool up twice as fast as one heavier
turbo.

        What Mercedes has done is to put the compressor at the front of
the engine and the turbine at the rear.  A shaft connects the two, with an
electric motor (the MGU-H) on the shaft as well.
        This allows a shorter intake path, which reduces lag.  And not
having the intake plumbing at the rear of the motor improves packaging
around the rear of the engine.

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.