Re: MB Engine Advantage | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: pbennett (pbennett![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:33:20 -0700 (PDT) |
Todd, Thanks for the clarification on the details, I mistook dual turbines
for dual turbos.
Apparently separating in/out turbines allows for using smaller diameter
turbines due to the heat advantage allowing for a smaller intercooler.
OK then Marco, as the new guy at Ferrari, perhaps you can arrange to buy MB engines for the F14-T and give Alonso an even playing field. That half second MB engine advantage can't be overcome with a fancy new wing design or more enthusiasm.
__________________________________________
a genius at MB attacked the turbo lag problem by choosing two shaft drivenhalf size turbos mounted at front/rear of the engine. Half the weight doeswonders for momentum as they will spool up twice as fast as one heavier turbo.
What Mercedes has done is to put the compressor at the front of the engine and the turbine at the rear. A shaft connects the two, with an electric motor (the MGU-H) on the shaft as well. This allows a shorter intake path, which reduces lag. And not having the intake plumbing at the rear of the motor improves packaging around the rear of the engine.
- Re: MB Engine Advantage, (continued)
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Doug & Terri, April 20 2014
-
Re: MB Engine Advantage Todd Walke, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Rick Moseley, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Doug & Terri, April 20 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage pbennett, April 21 2014
- Re: MB Engine Advantage Pat Scopelliti, April 20 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.