Why name it 488 ? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Michel Savard (mysavard![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:58:44 -0800 (PST) |
I must be missing something. I thought it was 4.8L,
8 cyl.
Same with 458. I thought it was 4.5L, 8 cyl. I
never really checked. I took it for granted that's what it was. Like the 308,
328, 348, etc.
So, why 458 and 488 ?
Michael Savard
|
- Re: 488!, (continued)
- Re: 488! Mark, February 3 2015
- Why name it 488 ? Michel Savard, February 3 2015
-
Re: Why name it 488 ? Gary Reed, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Rick Moseley, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? John Ashburne, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Clyde Romero, February 4 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.