Re: Why name it 488 ? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Ashburne (jashburne![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:53:40 -0800 (PST) |
Always have. They bounce around on car names all the time, starting I think when they switched from the "cc per cylinder" convention to "liters and number of cylinders" for the 512BB. The quirkiness is part of the charm! John Sent from my ATT Bell Rotary Dial Phone
|
- Re: 488!, (continued)
- Re: 488! Mark, February 3 2015
-
Why name it 488 ? Michel Savard, February 3 2015
-
Re: Why name it 488 ? Gary Reed, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Rick Moseley, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? John Ashburne, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Clyde Romero, February 4 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? John Ashburne, February 4 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Pat Scopelliti, February 4 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Gary Reed, February 4 2015
-
Re: Why name it 488 ? Gary Reed, February 3 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.