Re: Why name it 488 ? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Steve Jenkins (steve![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:53:37 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Michel Savard <mysavard [at] videotron.ca> wrote:
I must be missing something. I thought it was 4.8L, 8 cyl.Same with 458. I thought it was 4.5L, 8 cyl. I never really checked. I took it for granted that's what it was. Like the 308, 328, 348, etc.So, why 458 and 488 ?
I immediately thought back to the 288 also being an 8 cyl turbo, and the name just seemed to make sense. :)
SteveJ
- Re: Why name it 488 ?, (continued)
- Re: Why name it 488 ? John Ashburne, February 4 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Rick Moseley, February 4 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Erik Nielsen, February 4 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? John Ashburne, February 4 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Adam Green, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Doug, February 3 2015
- Re: Why name it 488 ? Clyde Romero, February 4 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.