Re: barrett-jackson | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Doug & Terri (dnt![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 19:09:02 -0800 (PST) |
cLYdE asks a good question “How come there is no blue book pricing on them?” Too few cars for a reasonably accurate $ sample number. In 1968 I worked at the GM Southgate California plant. We punched out a new car every 30 seconds or so. Nearly 1,000 a day. I think Ferrari banged out the 70’s 308 GTS/B at about 3 per day. I could be wrong on that. But regarding the Kelly Blue Book - California Dept of Ins explicitly will fine any insurance carrier who uses the “Blue Book” to establish the “Actual Cash Value” for a total vehicle loss. The Fair Claims Practices Act denotes very meticulous rules a company must follow to make their client whole. Follow it if you wish here - http://www.sedgwicklaw.com/files/Uploads/Documents/FairClaimsBk-2015E.pdf Go to page 17, Section c. Total Loss ACV or Replacement Provisions. A lot of mumbo jumbo but peel the onion slowly and it makes sense. In Kalifornia – one of the provisions is to buy you a replacement vehicle at no expense to you other than deductible. Many claims offices don’t (or at didn’t) know that. Standard answer – “we’re not in the used car business.” But if they write auto insurance in Kalifornia - - - they are. <grin> Doug |
- Re: barrett-jackson, (continued)
- Re: barrett-jackson Fellippe Galletta, January 20 2017
- Re: barrett-jackson Erik Nielsen, January 20 2017
- Re: barrett-jackson Fellippe Galletta, January 20 2017
- Re: barrett-jackson clyderomerof4, January 20 2017
- Re: barrett-jackson Doug & Terri, January 20 2017
- Re: barrett-jackson clyde romero, January 20 2017
- Re: barrett-jackson LSJ, January 20 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.