Re: F512M vs. 512TR | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Steve Jenkins (steve![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:18:23 -0700 (PDT) |
LOL. SOOOO 97. :) Yes, I've dyno'd the 512TR: http://ferrari.stevejenkins.com/downloads/512dyno.jpg http://ferrari.stevejenkins.com/downloads/dash.jpg 27 meg video (I've got a fast server, but yer gonna wanna fast pipe): http://ferrari.stevejenkins.com/downloads/dynoday.asf Driven an 512M, but not on a dyno. Sounded SWEEEEEEEET. SteveJ -----Original Message----- From: LS [mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 8:49 AM To: Steve Jenkins Cc: 'The FerrariList' Subject: Re: [Ferrari] F512M vs. 512TR TR vs 512TR is so 1997...who would ask that? I'm curious if anyone has actually scaled or "dyno-ed" their 512TR or F512M. I'd figure SJ would've if anyone. Thanks, LS --- Steve Jenkins <steve [at] stevejenkins.com> wrote: > My esteemed friend cLyDe: I believe the question was between the 512M > and > the 512TR, not the TR and the 512TR. > > IMHO, not that much difference behind the wheel between the 512M and > 512TR. > Styling diffs are the biggest difference, and some reliability > improvements > with the upgraded T.O. bearing, some titanium bits, and I believe the > input > shaft. Any time anything on my 512TR breaks or wears out that can be > replaced with a 512M piece, I do it. Not so much for performance, but > for > reliability. > > SteveJ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Clarence Romero Jr. [mailto:clyderomero [at] worldnet.att.net] > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:44 AM > To: Steve Jenkins > Cc: 'The FerrariList' > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] F512M vs. 512TR > > > Major league differences all the way around from acceleration and most > definitely braking and handling. > They are not even in the same class > The 512 TR which I call the series 2 is head and shoulders above the TR. > > Clyde > -----Original Message----- > From: LS [mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:01 PM > To: clyde > Cc: The FerrariList > Subject: [Ferrari] F512M vs. 512TR > > What are the dynamic differences as felt behind the wheel of these two > cars? > > Has anyone actually weighed or measured either on a dyno? > > Thanks, > LS > > www.exhaust.tv > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomero%40worldnet. > att.net > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/steve%40stevejenkins.co > m > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > www.exhaust.tv __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-
F512M vs. 512TR LS, September 20 2006
-
Re: F512M vs. 512TR Clarence Romero Jr., September 22 2006
-
Re: F512M vs. 512TR Steve Jenkins, September 22 2006
- Re: F512M vs. 512TR LS, September 22 2006
- Re: F512M vs. 512TR Steve Jenkins, September 22 2006
- Re: F512M vs. 512TR LS, September 22 2006
- Re: F512M vs. 512TR Steve Jenkins, September 22 2006
- Re: F512M vs. 512TR Gary Reed, September 22 2006
- Re: F512M vs. 512TR Steve Jenkins, September 22 2006
-
Re: F512M vs. 512TR Steve Jenkins, September 22 2006
-
Re: F512M vs. 512TR Clarence Romero Jr., September 22 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.