Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BRIGANDBAR (BRIGANDBAR![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:55:34 -0800 (PST) |
I guess in this instance, as in virtually all, the owner is trying to "pass" the car off as what it isn't. One of the guys in our Sat. morning Euro car club has gone to the trouble of buying a personalized license plate for his Lamborghini that says "REAL 1". IMNSHO I don't know as it is really an issue in social conversation, and that it couldn't be readily dismissed with a comment such as "nice copy" and complimenting this degree of admiration and the initiative to imitate until they can afford the "REAL 1". On the other hand, I've recently been thinking about picking up a fairly substandard RR Silver Cloud III with one of those GM conversions (considered to be in the same class as the "knockoffs" that we are discussing here in the RROC, etc.) and just throwing on a halfway decent but inexpensive paint job that tries to emulate the colors of the real one that I spend so much time restoring to drive in bad weather, around town in mall parking lots, etc. as an extra car (which I sorely do not need at this point, and could become a burden or inconvenience). I think that this would be similar to many of my clients and their friends who own imitations of their real jewelry, e.g. knockoff Piaget or Rolex watches, that they wear sometimes to make their insurance carrier happy or in places where damage could occur such as wearing a knockoff Daytona when reviewing a project in a strip mine. Scratching or breaking the crystal etc., on a $200 knockoff beats the hell out of doing it to a $15k watch. I wear one of the Citizen Eco somethings that is far to complex in its capabilities for me to fully utilize (I'm too lazy to learn to do everything that it can do) but does have all of the functions that I need without imitating something else but I don't know that I really would feel badly about wearing a Daytona knockoff if I really had one at home stored and protected from a rough environment. Heck, its okay for all of those Hollywood stars to keep their Tiffany or other "real stuff" jewelry in the safe and wearing their custom made paste imitations to many places why not for the rest of us. Wouold I build a 348 kit car just to drive to the mall. I really don't know as the 348 "shitbox" might get stolen at the mall (apologies to Clyde) and then I could buy "something real". but I like the car and really don't even want to start looking for another 348 Spyder if it were to be stolen, let alone in my small town one would have to be an idiot to do this as many of our friends are troopers or police officers and would call me on the cell phone if they saw someone else driving my car while they were in the process of stopping it and interrogating the operator. Knockoffs as cheap imitations for the real thing that one owns, for use in circumstances where the real thing might be stolen or damaged, even by road salt, vs. knockoffs because you are trying to pretend you are something that you are not? Is there really a difference? Is it a bad idea to protect your assets from damage or loss? Or should one simply buy one of those used (up) former police cruiser Crown Vics, saving them from life as a taxicab, as transportation in bad weather and/or bad neighborhoods (short of following Clyde's advice)? Definitely not for meets, or other places where similar real cars will be attending and real owners will be present but then again pehaps we should remember that the vast majority of the world is not as obsessed with exotic cars as we are and will neither know, or care if the car someone is driving is real or kit. Dr. Steve Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory Explosives Engineering Technologies 1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III.....1975 Pontiac Grandville 1980 MB 450 SL............................1982 Rolls Royce Corniche DHC 1988 Rolls Rouce Silver Spur..........1994 F-350 PowerStroke Diesel 1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder.................1996 Ford Bronco 2000 Lincoln Town Car....................2004 Ford Excursion + Audrey's 2 MB's [1980 450SL & 1987 420SEL] to care for... Legal Notice: This message does not constitute legal or other professional advice, nor does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or fiduciary relationship between the sender and/or any other party Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise the sender immediately. Electronic Transmission Security Notice: Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.
-
Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner BRIGANDBAR, December 7 2006
-
Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner Britt2Asa, December 7 2006
-
Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner Dave Craig, December 7 2006
- Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner Dave Craig, December 7 2006
- Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner LS, December 7 2006
-
Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner Dave Craig, December 7 2006
-
Re: My Experience with a Kit Car Owner Britt2Asa, December 7 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.