Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: ken rentiers (rentiers![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 08:19:07 -0700 (PDT) |
Only German hubris would permit hanging the engine out past the rear
wheels (the Strength-Through-Joy-Mobile) or sticking it ahead of the
front axle like a carrot for a reluctant donkey (the Advantage-
Through-Technology-Mobile). Both Audi and Porsche piss me off because
they work so well despite Newton's Laws. Of course it took several
generations for arrogant legions of slide-rule carrying Deutsche
Geeks to get it right, but they would have tried for 100 years before
they ever would admit they were wrong in the first place.
k
On Jun 2, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Doug and Terri Anderson wrote:
Ken - whadda bout the ubiquitous little KdF (Kraft durch Freude) Wagen?
DOUG
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes), (continued)
-
Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) jashburne, June 1 2007
-
Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) clyde romero, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) ken rentiers, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Doug and Terri Anderson, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) ken rentiers, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Doug and Terri Anderson, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Tom Reynolds, June 3 2007
-
Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) clyde romero, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Alfaowner, June 3 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) ken rentiers, June 3 2007
-
Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) jashburne, June 1 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.