Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Alfaowner (alfaowner![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 06:57:48 -0700 (PDT) |
Ken says,"English cars require a great deal of puttering, and are innocent of the laws of electricity, but they do a great job of the traditional wood inside... Japanese cars - exquisitely assembled, utterly reliable appliances. Toasters on wheels from the land of 15 mph." NOT ALWAYS! There was a time back in the late '80s / early '90s when my daily driver was an '80 MGB & my wife's a bought-new Toyota Camry. My MGB was 100% reliable, year-round, 10,000 miles a year. The Camry was the worst car we have ever owned for reliability, production quality, handling and it was useless in snow. And, the dealer knew less about what went wrong (which was often) than I did. After it left us stranded in the middle of nowhere for the 3rd time, it was traded for a Saab. We now have 2 German vehicles, 1 Italian & 1 British. And, after our Toyota experience, we'll never own another Toyota product. And, likely no other Japanese either. Norm
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes), (continued)
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Doug and Terri Anderson, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) ken rentiers, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Doug and Terri Anderson, June 2 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Tom Reynolds, June 3 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Alfaowner, June 3 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) ken rentiers, June 3 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) LarryT, June 3 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Rick Lindsay, June 3 2007
- Re: Absolutely NO Ferrari content (190SL Mercedes) Steve Jenkins, June 2 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.