Re: Betrayal of Journalists
From: Rich (RichF355comcast.net)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Reynolds" <kjtar [at] cox.net>
To: "Rich" <RichF355 [at] comcast.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Betrayal of Journalists


> The Liberal Media, as you put it, are basically the poor schleps who go
out every day and cover the homicides, police blotter, city council
meetings, etc.  Now, true, there do seem to be a few Liberal papers out
there (the New York Times and Boston Globe might spring to mind) but in most
cases, the editors and/or publishers of newspapers are rather wealthy
conservative types.
> There was a story on the radio about a week ago, can't remember exactly
where or when, now, having to do with the question of "Does it help or
hinder for a newspaper to give their endorsement to a candidate?"
>
> Tom Reynolds
> Tulsa, OK
>
==============

Yesterdays USA Today cover story on  the  NY Governor scandal, which was
covered in the front half of the paper and 1/2 the second page as well, the
article mentioned Spitzer many times and the former NJ Gov McGreevey's  sex
scandal. And as predictable as the sun setting, none of these   mentions by
USA today of the two resigned NY & NJ governors included any mention
whatsoever of their  party affiliation of democrat.
Not once . But in the one menton in the same article of  Idaho Senator Larry
Craig and his scandal, the USA today immediately identified Craig as a
Republican.
No media bias of course.

Rich

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.