Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue ... | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BRIGANDBAR (BRIGANDBAR![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:50:13 -0700 (PDT) |
I have to admit to some confusion. It seems difficult for me to understand how words posted to an Internet site can "bully" anyone. It's not like standing at the entry to the schoolyard and threatening you with physical harm if you don't give me your lunch money. I guess I believe that spoken and written words are free expression and can only harm those who choose to be so harmed by internalizing them and responding in a manner consistent with that internalization. It appears to me that everyone here is free in their right to expression and consistently exercises their right to do so (including yourself), so please feel free to say anything you wish, if truthful about me, and regardless of veracity, in response to something that I have written or said (just be sure that any quotations are accurate and not out of contrast). I remain neither the bully or the victim, Dr. Steve In a message dated 9/20/2008 10:50:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time, themightytoe [at] gmail.com writes: Ahh the season of Flist politics is upon us... Being someone who typically votes against a candidate rather than for one, man I miss the days of guns and watches and home theater equipment discussions... I have been reading a lot of this clap trap and diatribe of: If you like enemas and eating babies so and so is your man... with a definite undertone of "you suck for thinking that way" behind it all. Seriously that isn't so much a dialog as an attempt at bullying your beliefs onto everyone else. If you are going to talk about what is important to you, talk about what is important to you and if you really want to put it out there say why... Personally two things in life are inevitable: Death and taxes... I can frame what I want: 1. To always have good opportunities for employment and places to live 2. To know my family is happy (most of the time), safe and healthy and will be for their entire lives 3. To keep all the money I earn and to be able to spend it on what I want and where I want. 4. To know that my children, if they work for it, will have as good or better lives than I did 5. To be free to travel, explore, speak, read, learn, pray and be social how ever I want. 6. To know my neighbors share my values. 7. To know that the things I truly need in life (food, shelter, health care) will always be affordable 8. To know my friends and their friends and their friends have all the above items... Which parts of the list above do I think are a social responsibility that people recognize eg everyone sees that those goals are something we all should strive for? VS something the government needs to enforce and mandate since the people are too ignorant, greedy, or unorganized to do it? My view: People: #1, #2, #3, #4, #6 Govmint: #5, #7, #8 So that isn't too bad... Now as for candidates: They all are pretty much the same. Economics should drive most important decisions and having good advisors, qualified people, and a bit of good luck as with any endeavour, is the real key... I would not hire an electrical engineer to build a bridge and I would not hire a lawyer to remove my appendix... I would hire the best civil engineer and doctor I could afford... This is no different... Find out who has the best team, or can put together the best team and go with them. So can Obama and Biden build a better team than McCain and Palin? They pull from the same pools of people pretty much so which pair will listen to their advice and which pair is smarter? I don't know the answer to that, but I don't think Palin adds a lot of capability into the mix... Kinda like hiring your secretary to be your new CEO... Sure she may have sat in on a few meetings but she is seriously unqualified to balance the books every quarter... Its all moot since we have an electoral college anyhow and those snow blind Inuits from Alaska's votes count for like 3000 of us lower 48 stater's voters... Ah now to go eat some babies and vote for higher taxes.... BR, Mike _BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com_ (mailto:BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com) wrote: Tom: Maybe so, but I think you have to look at the past several years, at least since 9/11 to judge someone for the highest office in the land. If you believe in the Second Amendment, personal responsibility, and the ability to retain wealth that is earned, then Barry Hussein is not your man. If you are a liberal thinker who believes that those of us who have earned our (sometimes meager) wealth are obligated to use it in furtherance of avarice and indolence, affirmative action that distorts the quality of our employment and educational institutions through reverse discrimination, and that your personal property rights should be subordinated to social engineering, then of course Barry Hussein is the right choice. Its not a matter of good and evil, simply a matter of personal values (and of course the Constitution). If you agree with what B.H.O. has done with his adult life and think that you want America to follow that course vote for him for those reasons, not cute sayings of speech writers that he can memorize and regurgitate. Just hire the man who actually stands for one's personal belief structure, not the pretty face or TV anchorman presentation when recruiting for what may be the most important job in the entire world and is certainly the most important in the United States. If Barry Hussein Obame is your man, go for it. If not, look elsewhere for national leadership. And either way, hopefully we'll still be friends. Dr. Steve In a message dated 9/19/2008 9:24:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time, _kjtar [at] cox.net_ (mailto:kjtar [at] cox.net) writes: All I know is that Barack is smart, has good people around him, and can speak in public without embarrasing himself (if he were sensitive enough to recognize any slight errors). Also I saw a great quote, which I'll repeat here: Capitalism's criminal excesses saved by socialist governmental policies. (Or something like that, it was in the Tulsa World today, from a Nader speech as OSU Tulsa campus). Tom Reynolds Tulsa, OK ----- Original Message ----- From: _<BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com>_ (mailto:BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com) To: "Tom Reynolds" _<kjtar [at] cox.net>_ (mailto:kjtar [at] cox.net) Cc: "The FerrariList" _<ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>_ (mailto:ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com) Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest,Vol 26, Issue 27] Larry: If there were only to be a solution. Do we vote for Barry Hussein Obama, whose depth of experience is only exceeded by my son who is a college senior and might even graduate eventually, or the McManchurian candidate, a good sailor who stood up as best he could for as long as he could to the Hanoi Hilton and who is to be respected for that, but that experience is just not applicable to the job he is seeking, particularly after leaving his first wife who stood by a Navy POW Aviator during his confinement in the PRVN, but was then enticed by the riches of his second wife, who performs the same duties for him as Ms. Heinz-Kerry does for her former sailr? Votes for any other third party are "throw-a-ways" that will do no good, so it is once again a choice of the lesser of two evils a vote AGAINST a candidate rather than FOR one. And where do we stand financially? According to B. Hussein I am wealthy, and according to his opponent I shall never achieve that status. If it were only a field of four in which one could choose to vote for POTUS by giving him/her the highest number of votes and for V-POTUS by giving him/her the second highest number of votes. I would predict a Palin victory for the highest office of the land and who knows perhaps Command McManchuria might come in as V-POTUS. I am, today, really glad to be retired from my first primary occupation as I am not certain that I could respond in the affirmative to the question as to whether or not I would "take a bullet" for any of them. I was a simple question when Ronald Reagan was alive and well serving as POTUS but self-interest most probably would have prevailed (except during the period immediately following 9/11). Dr. Steve In a message dated 9/18/2008 5:16:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time, _ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com_ (mailto:ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com) writes: OK, Time to vent, I'm just a simple little guy 1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III...........1975 Pontiac GV Conv. 1980 MB 450SL..................................1982 RR Corniche 1985 MB 280 GE G-Wagen................. 1985 GMC Brigadier 20 Ton Winch/Wrecker 1988 Rolls Royce Silver Spur................1990 Cadillac "Eagle" Hearse 1994 F-350 Powerstroke 4x4................1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder 1996 Bronco ......................................2000 Lincoln Town Car 2004 Excursion...................................(+ Audrey's 2x MB's) and a 1976 Fire Truck...................................HAHN, WARNER & SWASEY- DUPLEX DIVISION HOWE APPARTUS . MODEL #R400 FIRE TRUCK w/a 100' Tower Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory Explosives Engineering Technologies lex talionis Fides tamen Quin Legal Notice: This message does not constitute legal or other professional advice, nor does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or fiduciary relationship between the sender and/or any other party Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise the sender immediately. Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arises as a result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission. **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (_http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014_ (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ) _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: _http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/kjtar%40cox.net_ (http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/kjtar [at] cox.net) Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines _http://www.F1Headlines.com/_ (http://www.f1headlines.com/) -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714 - Release Date: 3/8/07 **************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators. (_http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001_ (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001) ) _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: _http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/themightytoe%40gmail.com _ (http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/themightytoe [at] gmail.com) Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines _http://www.F1Headlines.com/_ (http://www.f1headlines.com/) **************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)
-
Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue ... BRIGANDBAR, September 20 2008
-
Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue ... Robert W. Garven Jr., September 20 2008
-
Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue ... Tom Reynolds, September 20 2008
- Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue ... Paul Bennett, September 20 2008
-
Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue ... Tom Reynolds, September 20 2008
-
Re: Latest Government Actions (NFC) [Ferrari Digest, Vol 26, Issue ... Robert W. Garven Jr., September 20 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.