Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rick Lindsay (rolindsay![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:51:54 -0800 (PST) |
Oh, that's exactly what I'm doing. This car isn't worth crap as a collector car so any money spent is in the same category as installing ceiling fans in a house. They may be nice but don't add a cent to the value. I'm going to create a straight-fold foam-core mockup, tweaking the dimensions for correct alignment, then transfer that design to sheet metal, to be formed and welded in place. This is alsso known as, "a good excuse to buy a welder." rick --- On Thu, 12/4/08, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: > From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was > Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) > To: "Rick Lindsay" <rolindsay [at] yahoo.com> > Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:46 AM > It may be cheaper to make the part yourself, but it's > certainly available in some way correct? > > LS > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Rick Lindsay <rolindsay [at] yahoo.com> > To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 10:58:40 AM > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with > Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old > man rambling on Tuesday) > > Exactly! I have a 1961 Mercedes 180b. It has a rusty > radius arm mount. The 4" x 12" piece of formed > sheet metal is $800 from the M-B Classic Center - and that > doesn't include the $79 mount point or the $39 rubber > donut - and does not (obviously) include > installation/welding. > > rick > > > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: > > > From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car > with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. > Old man rambling on Tuesday) > > To: "rolindsay" <rolindsay [at] yahoo.com> > > Cc: "The FerrariList" > <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 9:48 AM > > The $300k was to build an entire car from scratch with > > custom bodywork, wheels, chassis, etc. > > > > The standalone engine management is much, much, > > much cheaper and will be even less so in 20 yrs. > > > > Benz has started manufacturing all of their vintage > parts > > with super markups for old restorations to run the > > private parts suppliers out of business. > > > > Why wouldn't Ferrari do the same thing? > > > > LS > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Michael James > <cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com> > > To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > > Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 8:52:40 PM > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car > with > > Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. > Old > > man rambling on Tuesday) > > > > > > Agreed, but when it comes time to fix that F1 tranny > in 20 > > years, I don't think there will be many owners > who > > will pony-up anything close to $300K to fix or upgrade > a 360 > > F1 to keep it going. In another ten years, the 360 > will be > > lucky to maintain 20% of its original book-value. If > the > > value to reverse-engineer something surpasses the > total > > value of the car....the owner is screwed (or needs to > be > > REALLY in-love with the machine) . Much of the > > Tranny's electronics are made by Magnetti Marelli > - > > they're not well-known for keeping 'NOS' > parts > > on the shelf forever. > > > > Then again, Ferrari and some of their OEM parts > suppliers > > are probably scratching their heads over how many of > their > > 'old cars' they thought would have disappeared > long > > ago are being preserved and restored in quantities > close to > > original production numbers. I know people who are > > fabricating small plastic parts in their own > garage for > > vintage Ferraris...stuff that's been NLA for > > years....the Marque is enjoying a very loyal and > dedicated > > fan base that considers NOTHING Ferrari-related to be > > disposable. Will this continue? > > > > Hey, I hope I'm wrong....the future will be > > interesting! > > > > M > > > > --- On Wed, 12/3/08, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car > with > > Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. > Old > > man rambling on Tuesday) > > To: "Michael" > <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> > > Cc: "The FerrariList" > > <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > > Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 6:46 PM > > > > > > Jim, good to hear from you. Where have you been? > > > > I believe Michael James' concern was that as the > modern > > cars like the 360 > > get older, the complex electronics would make > restoration > > or maint impossible. > > > > When most of these cars need such a solution, they > will > > probably be too old > > (over 20 yrs in some states) to need to be emissions > > compliant. > > > > The F355 will be eligible for antique tags in 6 yrs > in my > > state! > > > > Not only will the E30 M3 be driven on the street > legally, > > it will retain cats > > and will pass 1989 tailpipe standards! Although, in > his > > area, he doesn't > > have to comply because the car will be exempt. > > > > They are doing it simply as a challenge. > > > > Regarding the motor...they were on the dyno last month > with > > Dinan's new V10 > > stroker, 5.6 liters I believe. They will have 600bhp > in a > > 2800lb E30 M3! > > > > He spent something like $30k for a new V10 motor just > to > > tune and setup the > > Pectel mgmt. After 1 day of dyno testing by Pectel, it > was > > trash and they threw > > the engine away. Onto engine #2... > > > > He has $300k into this whole project is not close to > being > > done. There is so > > much custom bodywork, fabrication, and over the top > detail > > work in the whole > > build. > > > > The next project is to redo one of the new M3s, throw > away > > all of the > > factory crap and replace with real hardware. 700bhp > turbo > > 5.6 V10, hidden > > rollcage, sequential Riccardo box, Comp dry > sump-Accusump > > system, carbon sun > > visors, fire extinguisher on the A pillar, etc. > > > > Besides...emissions? Where's that male body spray? > > > > LS > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Jim Conforti <lndshrk [at] xmission.com> > > To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > > Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 3:43:05 PM > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car > with > > Electronics...was Re: > > Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on > > Tuesday) > > > > At 09:00 AM 12/3/2008 -0800, LS wrote: > > > > >A friend of mine is building an '89 E30 M3 > with a > > 2008 BMW M5 v10 > > >drivetrain and suspension. Instead of cracking the > > factory ECU > > >programming, he trashed it and is having Dinan > assist > > him with a > > >standalone Pectel unit to takeover everything. It > was > > claimed that the > > >modern V10 BMW could not run without proprietary > BMW > > ECU control. It is a > > >ridiculous amount of work, but he is pioneering it > for > > the BMW world. It > > >is only the beginning. > > > > Of course said vehicle can NEVER be operated on any > > public highway in > > the USA. > > > > (Seriously) > > > > The chances of getting caught are low, but if he > does - > > I hope he's got > > incredibly > > deep pockets because it's rather expensive > fighting > > the US EPA in court. > > > > This, of course, is why you DON'T > "trash" > > the factory ECU. > > ROFLMAO. > > > > JC > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, > please > > visit: > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com > > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > > and F1 Headlines > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, > please > > visit: > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com > > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > > and F1 Headlines > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, > please > > visit: > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rolindsay%40yahoo.com > > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > > and F1 Headlines > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday), (continued)
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) clyde romero, December 3 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Rick Lindsay, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Rick Lindsay, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Dan Warlick, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) E M, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Ferrarisimo [at] Comcast.net, December 4 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.