Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mike Fleischer (themightytoe![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:34:52 -0700 (PDT) |
It isn'tTrucks have made that kind of power and torque for ages. The trick to the Veyron is getting the power to the ground efficiently. Dodge, when faced with this problem in their Vipers decided to put a truck motor and a truck transmission in the car back in 1993. Everyone else in the US copied that. Mercedes have monster torque in their motors... But hey don't they also have a truck division? The weight comes from most of these manufacturers not designing for lightness and also using ODM parts (like the brakes coming from Brembo, and the clutch from AP racing, and the headlights from Siemens and the Engine controllers from Bosch, and the tires from Michelin, and the wheels from SSR, etc...) And of course you must put 20 airbags in your car these days... Look at the Lambo Reventon, they did a set of custom wheels for that thing, and charge 1.7 million...
Costs are out of hand completely. Why does an F1 car cost >100 million for what is essentially 4-5 vehicles? Because its all hand made and custom built? I'd say most of the money goes into R&D costs (engineers, mechanics and support people fall into that category also), even those cars get a bunch of ODM stuff. I'd be downright shocked to find that Ferrari's F1 had differently sourced brakes than Williams...
My $0.02 Fellippe Galletta wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:26 AM, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote:I understand your points. But Murray's statement about not being able to build the F1 and Ferrari's about not being able to build the F40 again all are period statements. They always find a way some how...it is natural evolution and has a lot to do with materials technology, electronics, etc. Nobody (including VW) has put that much thought into the challenge of doing a McLaren F1 style car today. Murray had A/C and a CD changer in the original and it only weighed 2600lbs! VW took the easy way out and didn't impress anyone with the expended brain power. They just accepted standard practice for the difficult items (like weight) and counteracted with lots of complication. And, notice I didn't say "counteracted with lots of BHP", because that is a good thing. That VW powerplant is so big and heavy...a disaster. There are so many areas where they could shed weight and still meet all safety standards. The Veyron is a very lazy effort. LSI sincerely believe that the safety regs have outpaced the Engineers in terms of getting the weights down. Either that or it's completely down to dimensions, which admittedly keep growing every generation of car! We've seen HP shoot up dramatically since the early '90s, and not all of it necessarily because of displacement. When I see $450k purpose built supercars like the Porsche Carrera GT fail to weigh less than 3000 lbs, it raises the question of whether the manufacturers are really lazy. Remember, when you take away monetary design constraints from Engineers, you are giving them exactly what they want. And if they fail, you have to ask yourself why. There's probably some middle ground between our arguments (i.e. dimensions), but making a 2500 lb supercar with a 6.0 liter V12 might take awhile to make reality. With respect to the Bugatti Veyron, it's not so much an engineering exercise to make the power, but perhaps to harness it and keep it from destructing. If these cars last, I think props are due because all those radiators feel like a recipe for trouble! Also Clarkson pointed out that Ricardo had to engineer the transmission from scratch as this motor is more powerful than an F1 car (wayyy more torque). Maybe that is an overrated exercise as we have dragsters with that level of power, but maybe it isn't. FG _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/themightytoe%40gmail.comSponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlineshttp://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC), (continued)
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) LS, March 30 2009
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) E M, March 30 2009
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) LS, March 30 2009
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) Fellippe Galletta, March 30 2009
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) Mike Fleischer, March 30 2009
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) E M, March 30 2009
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) Fellippe Galletta, March 30 2009
- Re: BUGATTI WOW ! - (NFC) LS, March 30 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.