Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Michael James (cavallino_rapante![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:12:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Unless we're talking a Daytona or a 246, cars whose Book/Market-Value have actually kept pace with their service costs, then it doesn't make sense for the Dealerships to support these cars. The margins of bringing a used-car up to Dealership standards for the resale market, and allowing the Dealership to make a profit selling such a car just isn't there. It almost doesn't make sense for ANYONE to service these cars, except the DIY community or someone who loves the car enough to look-past the cost vs. value comparison. You have to LOVE the car to justify writing a $15,000 check for service on a $30K car....most people won't do that. Why can't I be "most people"...... Just look at the labor-rates in Ferrari Service from the early 1980s to today - can anyone legitimately justify paying today's Dealer labor rate on a 308 whose value is near full-depreciation? A "Major Service" used to cost $3,500 for everything. Now its over $5,000 and climbing - the parts-prices are the same, its the labor that's climbing. We're not talking Honda labor rates here......we're talking 360/430/612/599/Enzo labor-rates on a $30K car....nobody is pro-rating their labor charges based on book-value of the machine they're working-on....I wish they did but they won't. M --- On Thu, 4/30/09, Erik Nielsen <judge4re [at] gmail.com> wrote: From: Erik Nielsen <judge4re [at] gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 8:06 AM More or less none of them do. Been like that for a while. The older cars are studies in deferred maintenance, the dealers don't want the hassle of having to go through a car for a smaller margin. It's a time versus effort thing with them. But then again, when was the last time you could get a 10 year old Volvo from your local dealer? On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Robert Rehkopf <CaptRehkopf [at] comcast.net> wrote: > I was at Ferrari of Atlanta getting some work done on my car (and they did > an excellent job), but noticed, again that no 355s, 348s, etc no cars but > only 360 and newer. I also noticed this also at Ferrari of Washington (DC). > I ask one of the sales guys about an older car and he said they just refer > people to the FCA! The question is do any dealers deal in cars built before > say 2000? Just wondering? > > Robert > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/judge4re%40gmail.com > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Robert Rehkopf, April 30 2009
-
Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Erik Nielsen, April 30 2009
- Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Rick Lindsay, April 30 2009
- Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Larry B, April 30 2009
- Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Michael James, April 30 2009
-
Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Fortune Motors, April 30 2009
- Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Martin Stark, April 30 2009
- Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 red5hilser, April 30 2009
- Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 clyderomero, April 30 2009
-
Re: Ferrari Dealers--why no cars older than a 360 Erik Nielsen, April 30 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.