Re: Well, I did it. | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fellippe Galletta (fellippe.galletta![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:13:04 -0700 (PDT) |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Mike <themightytoe [at] gmail.com> wrote:
Probably the lack of torque was what made the gap seem smaller than it was.....I heard the same could be said about 348/355. ;)
Amazing how after all these years this nondescript BMW is the one to own....also impressive that it is a respected enthusiast car even by those who have tasted premier exotica. 321 hp. High revving, vanos required a witchdoctor to tune. Drove a students Euro spec e36 once. Not as huge a gap on the US spec as I thought there
Probably the lack of torque was what made the gap seem smaller than it was.....I heard the same could be said about 348/355. ;)
would be. The e30 evo or evo 2 is the one you want...
How much for a standard e30 (non m3), modified with heavy suspension work?
FG
- Re: Well, I did it., (continued)
- Re: Well, I did it. Stephen Sherman, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Jim Conforti, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Fellippe Galletta, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Mike, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Fellippe Galletta, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Mike, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Jim Conforti, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Fellippe Galletta, April 21 2010
- Re: Well, I did it. Mike Fleischer, April 22 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.