Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Larry T (l02turner![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:30:21 -0800 (PST) |
You make some
great points! Speaking of Atlanta and Ga in
general, there's a small town in Ga that
requires every household to
have a gun. Thus
is in response to the law in Morton grove Ill which banned guns.
Here's some interesting stats about those 2 towns: Here's the details: In March 1982, 30 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. Since then, despite dire predictions of “Wild West” showdowns and increased violence and accidents, not a single resident has been involved in a fatal shooting – as a victim, attacker or defender. The crime rate initially plummeted for several years after the passage of the ordinance, with the 2005 per capita crime rate actually significantly lower than it was in 1981, the year before passage of the law. Prior to enactment of the law, Kennesaw had a population of just 5,242 but a crime rate significantly higher (4,332 per 100,000) than the national average (3,899 per 100,000). The latest statistics available – for the year 2005 – show the rate at 2,027 per 100,000. Meanwhile, the population has skyrocketed to 28,189. By comparison, the population of Morton Grove, the first city in Illinois to adopt a gun ban for anyone other than police officers, has actually dropped slightly and stands at 22,202, according to 2005 statistics. More significantly, perhaps, the city’s crime rate increased by 15.7 percent immediately after the gun ban, even though the overall crime rate in Cook County rose only 3 percent. Today, by comparison, the township’s crime rate stands at 2,268 per 100,000. This was not what some predicted. In a column titled “Gun Town USA,” Art Buchwald suggested Kennesaw would soon become a place where routine disagreements between neighbors would be settled in shootouts. The Washington Post mocked Kennesaw as “the brave little city … soon to be pistol-packing capital of the world.” Phil Donahue invited the mayor on his show. Reuters, the European news service, today revisited the Kennesaw controversy following the Virginia Tech Massacre. Police Lt. Craig Graydon said: “When the Kennesaw law was passed in 1982 there was a substantial drop in crime … and we have maintained a really low crime rate since then. We are sure it is one of the lowest (crime) towns in the metro area.” Kennesaw is just north of Atlanta. The Reuters story went on to report: “Since the Virginia Tech shootings, some conservative U.S. talk show hosts have rejected attempts to link the massacre to the availability of guns, arguing that had students been allowed to carry weapons on campus someone might have been able to shoot the killer.” Virginia Tech, like many of the nation’s schools and college campuses, is a so-called “gun-free zone,” which Second Amendment supporters say invites gun violence – especially from disturbed individuals seeking to kill as many victims as possible. Cho Seung-Hui murdered 32 and wounded another 15 before turning his gun on himself. On 12/23/2012 2:30 PM, rtpetrick wrote:
How can you be sure that some people, at least, don't buy cars to use as weapons?......drunk or sober. Not all weapons are made specifically to kill people, nor do all people buy weapons specifically to kill people, even though some may. If I remember correctly, you live in Atlanta. Do you own a hand gun? A semi-auto hand gun? Why? Could it be.......................... http://www.cityrating.com/crime-statistics/georgia/atlanta.html Assault Rifles (selective triggers to full auto) are military weapons specifically designed to kill people as efficiently as possible. They are heavily regulated, difficult for law abiding citizens to obtain, and yet somehow, the bad guys seem to have few problems obtaining them. Assault Weapons, like civilianized AR-15s, are not designed specifically to kill people, although they certainly can be used to do so. To say that they are designed specifically to kill people would then say that a Remington 7400 (Deer rifle that doesn't look like a black rifle, but performs in the same way) is also designed to kill people, since it is a clip fed, semi-automatic, center-fire rifle, offered in military calibers....30.06 and .308. What I am saying is that it depends on the user, not the tool. The matter is complex. Dr. Krauthammer talks about three variables: The weapon, the shooter, and the culture.......... But the over-riding issue about gun control is that it is about government expanding its control of, and its power over, its citizens. After they seized power, what common action linked Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Castro, and Qaddafi together.......one of the first executive actions they took against their countrymen??????? Are we doomed not to learn from history????? If you want a good read, albeit a long one, suggest you read...... http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/an-opinion-on-gun-control/ Regards Feliz Navidad Prospero Ano y Felicidad -----Original Message----- From: cjromero [mailto:clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net] Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 12:29 PM To: rtpetrick Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Clyde:Let the debate begin Ok I get your point but you don't buy a car Any car to go out and assault people unless your drunk Bottom line is that those weapons are made for just that Cars are not Clyde Sent from my iPhone On Dec 23, 2012, at 12:44 PM, "rtpetrick" <rtpetrick [at] comcast.net> wrote:Clyde, Please consider: http://www.nraila.org/glossary.aspxFrom the NRA-ILA glossary..ASSAULT RIFLE By U.S. Army definition, a selective-fire rifle chambered for a cartridge of intermediate power. If applied to any semi-automatic firearm regardless of its cosmetic similarity to a true assault rifle, theterm is incorrect.ASSAULT WEAPON Any weapon used in an assault (see WEAPON). WEAPON Webster defines it as "an instrument of offensive or defensive combat." Thus an automobile, baseball bat, bottle, chair, firearm, fist, pen knife or shovel is a "weapon," if so used. You suggest that we use the NRA definition of assault weapon, which isO.K.with me. And so to your question: Who on the list still thinks we need assault weapons? If we use the NRA definition of Assault Weapon, then by definition, a Ferrari could be considered an assault weapon, if it is used as an instrument of offensive or defensive combat. Then the question could be changed to: Who on the list still thinks we need Ferraris? Conversely, if a civilized AR-15 is used for target shooting, and not as an instrument of offensive or defensive combat, then by definition, it must NOT be an assault weapon. To me, the issue is not about need.....it is about rights.....it is about political power and therefore votes.....it is about increasing government control......and......it is about loss of individual liberty. An armed law-abiding person is a CITIZEN! A disarmed law-abiding person is a SUBJECT! For those who understand this distinction, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not understand this distinction, noexplanation is possible.Regards Feliz Navidad Prospero Ano y Felicidad -----Original Message----- From: cjromero [mailto:clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:18 PM To: rtpetrick Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Clyde:Let the debate begin Lets go with the NRA definition Ok Or if you want any type of military type weapon that has been civilianized Your call Clyde Sent from my iPhone On Dec 22, 2012, at 5:51 PM, "rtpetrick" <rtpetrick [at] comcast.net> wrote:Clyde, Please define "Assault Weapon". Regards Feliz Navidad Prospero Ano y Felicidad -----Original Message----- From: ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com [mailto:ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:34 PM To: rtpetrick [at] comcast.net Subject: Ferrari Digest, Vol 77, Issue 10 Send Ferrari mailing list submissions to ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ferrari-owner [at] ferrarilist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ferrari digest..." Today's Topics: 1. let the debate begin (cjromero) 2. Re: let the debate begin (Steven Noble) 3. Re: let the debate begin (Rick Moseley) 4. Re: let the debate begin (Doug and Terri Anderson) 5. Re: let the debate begin (cjromero) 6. Re: let the debate begin Was Guns now Roman Gladius (Robert W. Garven Jr.) --------------------------------------------------------------------- - Message: 1 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:58:37 -0500 From: "cjromero" <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net> Subject: [Ferrari] let the debate begin To: "'The FerrariList'" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Message-ID: <000001cde08f$7f7bb010$7e731030$ [at] net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Ok so who on the list still thinks we need to have assault weapons? And for those who hunt can you hunt at night? Standby I am going BURNERS ANGELS 50!! Clyde Romero just the right amount of wrong! "SCARS ARE TATTOOS WITH BETTER STORIES"_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomerof4%40b ellsouth.net Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/ |
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin, (continued)
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin cjromero, December 23 2012
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin rtpetrick, December 23 2012
- Message not available
- Re: Sorry, not sure i know who "Ripetrick" is, but I quote him rtpetrick, December 24 2012
- Message not available
- Re: Sorry, not sure i know who "Ripetrick" is, but I quote him rtpetrick, December 25 2012
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin Larry T, December 24 2012
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin Rick Moseley, December 23 2012
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin cjromero, December 23 2012
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin bglarson, December 23 2012
- Re: Clyde:Let the debate begin rtpetrick, December 24 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.