Ferrari Mailing List: Re: 512TR vs Countach video

[LS (lashdeep]

Poster of the S1 LP400S and a DD in the garage!

 

central

wines-spirits   est 1934

625 e street nw

washington, dc 20004

centralwines.com

facebook.com/CentralLiquors

202-737-2800

---

From: Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com>
To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 512TR vs Countach video

The age old debate :

DD QV power or 400/400S purity.

The low body series 1 400S is the most violent looking car out of S'antagata. It's ridiculous how much lower looking it is than a standard CT.

A toughie. :)

On Friday, February 22, 2013, LS wrote:

Injection on 5000 and later models only for non-Euro spec models.

Downdraft is six 2 barrel Webers on the Euro spec QV model only.

Non-Euro QV is fuel injection.

DD is much, much faster and can't be compared to any other Countach in terms of power.

A well setup early LP400 is a quick car, but the DD is a monster.

 

central

wines-spirits   est 1934

625 e street nw

washington, dc 20004

centralwines.com

facebook.com/CentralLiquors

202-737-2800

---

From: Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com>
To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 512TR vs Countach video

Every carbed Countach starting with the 5000S had an injected sibling. From memory I think even the 400S might have had an injected version (hope not).

On Friday, February 22, 2013, Adam Green wrote:

So long as the intake manifold is a vertical flow design above the inlets, it's a downdraft principle.  

I thought all the Lambo's were tractor engines with carbs, no?

Adam

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Michael James <cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com> wrote:

Is the 25th Anniversary Countach still considered a 'downdraft' car, when it has no carbs on the engine?

 

M J

--- On Fri, 2/22/13, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote:

From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 512TR vs Countach video

To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 4:45 PM

Looks to be pretty accurate...512TR and downdraft Countach even in acceleration then the TR pulling away at higher speed due to aero.

A wingless Countach probably would've been even closer.

 

central

wines-spirits   est 1934

625 e street nw

washington, dc 20004

centralwines.com

facebook.com/CentralLiquors

202-737-2800

---

From: Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net>
To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 512TR vs Countach video

Yeah but they (wings) were great for the buffet spread at a concours....

But your point was brought up in the R&T issue that did this test with the BB and the Countach.   The wing killed the top end.  The BB ate it up on speed runs.

Rick

---

From: Martin Stark <mstark [at] copper.net>
To: Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Fri, February 22, 2013 11:16:08 AM
Subject:

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.f1headlines.com/