Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol 99, Issue 7
From: tomgua [at] netzero.com (tomguanetzero.com)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 19:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Other than the engine being behind the driver making leaking gas smells less 
evident than a front engine car,  I don't see the carbed 308 any more prone to 
engine fires than any other carbed car.  The CIS injected cars with brittle 
injection lines are a more likely candidate for an engine fire.  

---------- Original Message ----------
From: ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com
To: Tom Guadagni <tomgua [at] netzero.com>
Subject: Ferrari Digest, Vol 99, Issue 7
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 08:15:54 -0700

Send Ferrari mailing list submissions to
        ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
        ferrari-owner [at] ferrarilist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ferrari digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol 98, Issue 85 (Britt2Asa)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:15:39 +0100
From: Britt2Asa <britt2asa [at] aol.com>
To: Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com>
Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari Digest, Vol 98, Issue 85
Message-ID: <C010EA0B-34FA-4018-930C-3AE37B5EBAD4 [at] aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I don't know anybody here in the UK who would say maintenance on an Esprit is 
cheap! Than again a full cambelt service on a 328 here is 800 - 1200.00 pounds 
for quality work and you guys pay HOW Much in the USA for the same?

I never could figure out the service costs in the US for Ferraris but maybe it 
is as simple as supply and demand. There are a ton of very good quality Ferrari 
people in the 
UK and that means lots of competition and not having to drive very far......

Regards
Britt

Sent from my iPad

> On 1 Oct 2014, at 12:25, Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I'm sure somebody would say it isn't, and the reverse is true of a 328.....
> 
> Maintenance risk in the eye of the beholder. :)
> 
> FG
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Clyde Romero <clyderomerof4 [at] 
>> bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> The maintenance on that car is staggering 
>> 
>> Clyde Romero
>> 
>> In Victory you deserve Champagne
>> In Defeat You Need It!
>> 
>> If you obey all the rules
>> You miss all the fun !
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] 
>>> gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> An '04 Lotus Esprit Turbo V8 going for mid 30s looks to be a damn fine 
>>> bargain right now....
>>> 
>>> :)
>>> 
>>> FG
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Clyde Romero <clyderomerof4 [at] 
>>>> bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>> Wade sells Ferraris 
>>>> All people in prison are innocent!
>>>> Do you see the similarities ?
>>>> It's just like the Porsche crowd going crazy for air cooled cars, paying 
>>>> stupid money no less
>>>> Spend 6 figure money for a shit box that leaks oil 
>>>> What next Russian ZIL's? Yugos ?
>>>> Is there a room somewhere on this planet where whomever goes and turns a 
>>>> knob and says"this is the next big thing" shades of tickle me Elmo craze 
>>>> many years back and the cabbage patch dolls!
>>>> Please 
>>>> They are cars Period end of statement and the 308 carb one was one the 
>>>> worst ! 
>>>> It was like the Apollo capsule, it liked to catch fire!
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> In victory you deserve Champagne
>>>> In defeat you need it!
>>>> 
>>>>      
>>>> 
>>>> Scars are Tattoos with better stories !
>>>> 
>>>> If you follow all the rules
>>>> You miss all the fun! 
>>>> 
>>>> Clyde Romero
>>>> Clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net.          
>>>> 678  6419932
>>>> 
>>>> Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail ( including attachments ) is covered 
>>>> by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 
>>>> 2510-2521, and is intended only for the persons or entity to which it is 
>>>> addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material.  Any 
>>>> unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding 
>>>> or distribution is prohibited.
>>>> This email transmission, and any documents, files or previous email 
>>>> messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is 
>>>> priviledged.  If you are not the intended recipient, or a person 
>>>> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>>>> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the 
>>>> information containes in or attached to this message is STRICTLY 
>>>> PROHIBITED.  If you have received this transmission in error, please 
>>>> immediately notify us by reply e-mail at Clyde.romero [at] yahoo.com or  
>>>> by telephone at (678 6419932)and destroy the original transmission and its 
>>>> attachments without reading them or saving them to disk.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Dennis Burleson <d_burles [at] 
>>>>> bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wade says his '85 308 Qv has an "agreed upon price" of $80K with Hagerty. 
>>>>> I think I have seen this car, and I would agree. $80K would be a low 
>>>>> number to replace this car "as is" in its current state of condition. 
>>>>> That said, I would suppose a substantial amount of documentation would be 
>>>>> required to justify this agreement with the bean counters at Hagerty.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A recent "news report" from Yahoo says that the next cars to stash away 
>>>>> are the mid to late '80s TRs. ( heads up for Clyde). This leads me to 
>>>>> believe that the 308 series are next in line for speculation (read: 
>>>>> profits). Wade says that 308 profits are at least 20 to 30 years out. I 
>>>>> just spent 383 days and about $15K in parts in a mechanical "re 
>>>>> freshening." Original paint,  otherwise it's ready to drive, and drive it 
>>>>> I will. My Hagerty agreed upon value currently is $35K. This is more 
>>>>> along the train of thought that Clyde alludes to.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As I have often said, "you take an old car and fix it up, and what do you 
>>>>> have? A fixed up old car."
>>>>> Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
>>>>> Way back when, who'd thunk that $3,000 was crazy for an old worn out 250 
>>>>> GTO?
>>>>> I'm gonna pass this car on to my 18 year old son. I'll be working on 
>>>>> Ferraris for Jesus in 20 years, so I won't be "here" to see what happens 
>>>>> in the speculative sport of Ferrari ownership. Paying it forward, I 
>>>>> suppose.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My humble 2 pennies.
>>>>> DB
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:01 PM, "ferrari-request [at] 
>>>>> ferrarilist.com" <ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Send Ferrari mailing list submissions to
>>>>>     ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>     http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>     ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>     ferrari-owner [at] ferrarilist.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of Ferrari digest..."
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   1. Re: Hagerty 328 Valuation (Doug & Terri)
>>>>>   2. Re: Hagerty 328 Valuation (Clyde Romero)
>>>>>   3. Re: 456 issues (David)
>>>>>   4. Re: Hagerty 328 Valuation (LS)
>>>>>   5. Re: 456 issues (Clyde Romero)
>>>>>   6. Re: 456 issues (LarryT)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:55:22 -0700
>>>>> From: "Doug & Terri" <dnt [at] dock.net>
>>>>> To: "'Bob Ochsman'" <ochsman [at] gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: 'The FerrariList' <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Hagerty 328 Valuation
>>>>> Message-ID: <001901cfdcbe$8f874e60$ae95eb20$@dock.net>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bob notes ?Hagerty refused yesterday to place a declared value of $70,000 
>>>>> on my '88 328 GTS - 30,000 miles.?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Drat ? that?s a cold shot Bob.  Well, Hagerty does evaluate a #2 car (a 
>>>>> previous #1 Pebble Beach winner) with quite a high set of standards.  An 
>>>>> average value for a 328 between $45,000 and $59,725.  Mix that in with 
>>>>> the actuary?s tables (I knew an actuary once ? boring fellow who spent 
>>>>> his time memorizing random digit tables and phone books) and they arrive 
>>>>> at a risk they are willing to accept.  Add to the mix where you live.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since they usually only have your pictures they requested and your 
>>>>> self-evaluation they draw up their underwriting conclusions.  Yea or nay.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> SO ? what I tell my associates ? enter your car in a concours or ANY 
>>>>> graded car show.  Most likely the numerical grade would place a fine car 
>>>>> in the upper reaches of the chart and it IS a grade by LEARNED judges 
>>>>> with their eyes ON your very car.  Fact is ? because judges are human 
>>>>> (most are, really) they even have a tendency to rate, um, middlin? cars 
>>>>> higher than they should be ? after all, you don?t want to crush the poor 
>>>>> owner?s heart ? but the car is out of contention for a trophy.  Even a 
>>>>> modest car is usually rated at least 85 out of a hundred points.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> What I am getting at ? enter your car is a graded car show.  Submit a 
>>>>> copy of the judges sheets along with your pictures.  Here you have given 
>>>>> the insurer more to grade your car on than just a few two dimensional 
>>>>> pictures of a three dimensional object and your loving words.  After all 
>>>>> ? does a mother EVER have an ugly kid?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Onward
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> DOUG
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: Ferrari [mailto:ferrari-bounces+dnt=dock.net [at] ferrarilist.com] 
>>>>> On Behalf Of Bob Ochsman
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:11 AM
>>>>> To: DOUG
>>>>> Cc: The FerrariList
>>>>> Subject: [Ferrari] Hagerty 328 Valuation
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Their position
>>>>> 
>>>>> is that is too high a valuation.  Their rep by phone said they would 
>>>>> study the matter further and get back to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now, before you guys get on my case that that's not a Clyde value, that 
>>>>> is true.  But to my mind, the declared value for insurance purposes 
>>>>> should be the full retail value.  In any case, I'm a customer who is 
>>>>> willing to pay the insurance tab for this valuation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was motivated to raise the declared value on my car by both the 
>>>>> valuation data in Cavallino and the values posted in the latest issue of 
>>>>> Forza.  While they may not be fully accurate, many potential buyers and 
>>>>> sellers will baseline their negotiations against those numbers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In any case, the situation is pending and the Hagerty rep said they'd 
>>>>> come back to me with their final determination in a day or two.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> <http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20140930/df7e89c4/attachment.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:20:10 -0400
>>>>> From: Clyde Romero <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
>>>>> To: Doug & Terri <dnt [at] dock.net>
>>>>> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Hagerty 328 Valuation
>>>>> Message-ID: <0CAF2456-F204-4087-A7F1-246B0EBE60D1 [at] bellsouth.net>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>> 
>>>>> The insurance companies are getting wise
>>>>> They know that the auctions are inflated 
>>>>> Who in there right mind thinks a 328 is worth more than 30k ?
>>>>> Auctions don't represent the actual street market
>>>>> 
>>>>> This might hurt some feeling but it is what it is
>>>>> 
>>>>> Much like the idiots who buy beach property and all of a sudden it's 
>>>>> worth millions and we the tax payer have to subsidize the flood insurance 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Realistically older Ferrari's are just that older cars
>>>>> The hype no longer is sticking 
>>>>> 
>>>>> For those with stupid deep pockets who want to brag they bought some 60's 
>>>>> slush box God bless them
>>>>> 
>>>>> Like I have always said 
>>>>> If you want to know what God thought about money
>>>>> Look who he gave it too !
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gotta go 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Clyde Romero
>>>>> 
>>>>> In Victory you deserve Champagne
>>>>> In Defeat You Need It!
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you obey all the rules
>>>>> You miss all the fun !
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> > On Sep 30, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Doug & Terri <dnt [at] dock.net> wrote:
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Bob notes ?Hagerty refused yesterday to place a declared value of 
>>>>> > $70,000 on my '88 328 GTS - 30,000 miles.?
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > Drat ? that?s a cold shot Bob.  Well, Hagerty does evaluate a #2 car (a 
>>>>> > previous #1 Pebble Beach winner) with quite a high set of standards.  
>>>>> > An average value for a 328 between $45,000 and $59,725.  Mix that in 
>>>>> > with the actuary?s tables (I knew an actuary once ? boring fellow who 
>>>>> > spent his time memorizing random digit tables and phone books) and they 
>>>>> > arrive at a risk they are willing to accept.  Add to the mix where you 
>>>>> > live.
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > Since they usually only have your pictures they requested and your 
>>>>> > self-evaluation they draw up their underwriting conclusions.  Yea or 
>>>>> > nay.
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > SO ? what I tell my associates ? enter your car in a concours or ANY 
>>>>> > graded car show.  Most likely the numerical grade would place a fine 
>>>>> > car in the upper reaches of the chart and it IS a grade by LEARNED 
>>>>> > judges with their eyes ON your very car.  Fact is ? because judges are 
>>>>> > human (most are, really) they even have a tendency to rate, um, 
>>>>> > middlin? cars higher than they should be ? after all, you don?t want to 
>>>>> > crush the poor owner?s heart ? but the car is out of contention for a 
>>>>> > trophy.  Even a modest car is usually rated at least 85 out of a 
>>>>> > hundred points.
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > What I am getting at ? enter your car is a graded car show.  Submit a 
>>>>> > copy of the judges sheets along with your pictures.  Here you have 
>>>>> > given the insurer more to grade your car on than just a few two 
>>>>> > dimensional pictures of a three dimensional object and your loving 
>>>>> > words.  After all ? does a mother EVER have an ugly kid?
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > Onward
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > DOUG
>>>>> > 
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > From: Ferrari [mailto:ferrari-bounces+dnt=dock.net [at] 
>>>>> > ferrarilist.com] On Behalf Of Bob Ochsman
>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:11 AM
>>>>> > To: DOUG
>>>>> > Cc: The FerrariList
>>>>> > Subject: [Ferrari] Hagerty 328 Valuation
>>>>> >  
>>>>> >  Their position
>>>>> > is that is too high a valuation.  Their rep by phone said they would 
>>>>> > study the matter further and get back to me.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Now, before you guys get on my case that that's not a Clyde value, that 
>>>>> > is true.  But to my mind, the declared value for insurance purposes 
>>>>> > should be the full retail value.  In any case, I'm a customer who is 
>>>>> > willing to pay the insurance tab for this valuation.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > I was motivated to raise the declared value on my car by both the 
>>>>> > valuation data in Cavallino and the values posted in the latest issue 
>>>>> > of Forza.  While they may not be fully accurate, many potential buyers 
>>>>> > and sellers will baseline their negotiations against those numbers.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > In any case, the situation is pending and the Hagerty rep said they'd 
>>>>> > come back to me with their final determination in a day or two.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Thoughts?
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>>>>> > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomerof4%40bellsouth.net
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
>>>>> > and F1 Headlines
>>>>> > http://www.F1Headlines.com/
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> <http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20140930/97f22e52/attachment.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 3
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:24:58 -0700
>>>>> From: "David" <david [at] tynerroberts.com>
>>>>> To: "'Fellippe Galletta'" <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: 'The FerrariList' <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 456 issues
>>>>> Message-ID: <F087F58DEB6546038E73BEE67D9EF669@X120>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Window ECUs suck and are NLA, fuel pump assemblies are crap and components
>>>>> are NLA (pump is available, but is useless without the various rubber bits
>>>>> to mount it in the tank), seat ECUs are NLA, and the list goes on. It 
>>>>> isn't
>>>>> that the parts are expensive (they are), it's that they just aren't
>>>>> available. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Engine wise both cars are pretty good, but with the 456 prices so low, 
>>>>> there
>>>>> is usually a lot of deferred maintenance - just like 308s a few years ago.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 456M is the preferred option, but has the exact same issues as a regular
>>>>> 456. 550 is a much better bet but still suffers fuel pump issues with no
>>>>> parts available. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Remember, there is no such thing as a cheap Ferrari - purchase price is 
>>>>> only
>>>>> the beginning.
>>>>> 
>>>>> HTH, Dave
>>>>> 
>>>>>   _____  
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: Ferrari
>>>>> [mailto:ferrari-bounces+david=tynerroberts.com [at] ferrarilist.com] On 
>>>>> Behalf Of
>>>>> Fellippe Galletta
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:33 AM
>>>>> To: David
>>>>> Cc: The FerrariList
>>>>> Subject: [Ferrari] 456 issues
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> A coworker asked me about the 456, and I told him it's a wonderful value 
>>>>> for
>>>>> a modern V12 F. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just that it has a few potential issues that could quickly add up to the
>>>>> price of the car, hehe.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So what were they exactly?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I remember something about the windows, maybe windshield too. Also the 
>>>>> auto
>>>>> trans could be an expensive rebuild (but nobody wants an auto 456!). 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can't imagine it would be too bad. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking at the V12 universe, it looks to be a good value. Even better than
>>>>> the Maranello possibly...
>>>>> 
>>>>> FG
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> <http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20140930/ee564b15/attachment.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 4
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:18:14 -0700
>>>>> From: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>
>>>>> To: Bob Ochsman <ochsman [at] gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Hagerty 328 Valuation
>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>     <1412093894.76652.YahooMailNeo [at] web120205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bob, switch to Grundy. I just cranked up my agreed upon values based on 
>>>>> current selling prices and they did not flinch. The rates didn't really 
>>>>> even go up that much.
>>>>> 
>>>>> LS
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> central 
>>>>> wines-spirits  est 1934
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 625 e street nw
>>>>> 
>>>>> washington, dc 20004
>>>>> 
>>>>> centralwines.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> facebook.com/CentralLiquors 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 202-737-2800
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Bob Ochsman <ochsman [at] gmail.com>
>>>>> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> 
>>>>> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> 
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:11 AM
>>>>> Subject: [Ferrari] Hagerty 328 Valuation
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hagerty refused yesterday to place a declared value of $70,000 on my '88 
>>>>> 328 GTS - 30,000 miles.  Their position
>>>>> 
>>>>> is that is too high a valuation.  Their rep by phone said they would 
>>>>> study the matter further and get back to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now, before you guys get on my case that that's not a Clyde value, that 
>>>>> is true.  But to my mind, the declared value for insurance purposes 
>>>>> should be the full retail value.  In any case, I'm a customer who is 
>>>>> willing to pay the insurance tab for this valuation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was motivated to raise the declared value on my car by both the 
>>>>> valuation data in Cavallino and the values posted in the latest issue of 
>>>>> Forza.  While they may not be fully accurate, many potential buyers and 
>>>>> sellers will baseline their negotiations against those numbers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> In any case, the situation is pending and the Hagerty rep said they'd 
>>>>> come back to me with their final determination in a day or two.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>>>>> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
>>>>> and F1 Headlines
>>>>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> <http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20140930/326fe915/attachment.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 5
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:39:23 -0400
>>>>> From: Clyde Romero <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net>
>>>>> To: David <david [at] tynerroberts.com>
>>>>> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 456 issues
>>>>> Message-ID: <96B2AF6C-2A01-45F1-81F6-9EDE7905BC66 [at] bellsouth.net>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>> 
>>>>> What's with the 550 fuel pump?
>>>>> Never heard of any issues
>>>>> 
>>>>> In victory you deserve Champagne
>>>>> In defeat you need it!
>>>>> 
>>>>>     
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scars are Tattoos with better stories !
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you follow all the rules
>>>>> You miss all the fun! 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Clyde Romero
>>>>> Clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net.          
>>>>> 678  6419932
>>>>> 
>>>>> Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail ( including attachments ) is covered 
>>>>> by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 
>>>>> 2510-2521, and is intended only for the persons or entity to which it is 
>>>>> addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material.  Any 
>>>>> unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding 
>>>>> or distribution is prohibited.
>>>>> This email transmission, and any documents, files or previous email 
>>>>> messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is 
>>>>> priviledged.  If you are not the intended recipient, or a person 
>>>>> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>>>>> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the 
>>>>> information containes in or attached to this message is STRICTLY 
>>>>> PROHIBITED.  If you have received this transmission in error, please 
>>>>> immediately notify us by reply e-mail at Clyde.romero [at] yahoo.com or  
>>>>> by telephone at (678 6419932)and destroy the original transmission and 
>>>>> its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk.
>>>>> 
>>>>> > On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:24 AM, David <david [at] tynerroberts.com> wrote:
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Window ECUs suck and are NLA, fuel pump assemblies are crap and 
>>>>> > components are NLA (pump is available, but is useless without the 
>>>>> > various rubber bits to mount it in the tank), seat ECUs are NLA, and 
>>>>> > the list goes on. It isn't that the parts are expensive (they are), 
>>>>> > it's that they just aren't available.
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > Engine wise both cars are pretty good, but with the 456 prices so low, 
>>>>> > there is usually a lot of deferred maintenance - just like 308s a few 
>>>>> > years ago.
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > 456M is the preferred option, but has the exact same issues as a 
>>>>> > regular 456. 550 is a much better bet but still suffers fuel pump 
>>>>> > issues with no parts available.
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > Remember, there is no such thing as a cheap Ferrari - purchase price is 
>>>>> > only the beginning.
>>>>> >  
>>>>> > HTH, Dave
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > From: Ferrari [mailto:ferrari-bounces+david=tynerroberts.com [at] 
>>>>> > ferrarilist.com] On Behalf Of Fellippe Galletta
>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:33 AM
>>>>> > To: David
>>>>> > Cc: The FerrariList
>>>>> > Subject: [Ferrari] 456 issues
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > A coworker asked me about the 456, and I told him it's a wonderful 
>>>>> > value for a modern V12 F.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Just that it has a few potential issues that could quickly add up to 
>>>>> > the price of the car, hehe.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > So what were they exactly?
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > I remember something about the windows, maybe windshield too. Also the 
>>>>> > auto trans could be an expensive rebuild (but nobody wants an auto 
>>>>> > 456!). 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > I can't imagine it would be too bad. 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Looking at the V12 universe, it looks to be a good value. Even better 
>>>>> > than the Maranello possibly...
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > FG
>>>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>>>>> > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomerof4%40bellsouth.net
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
>>>>> > and F1 Headlines
>>>>> > http://www.F1Headlines.com/
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> <http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20140930/1b81b292/attachment.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 6
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:00:55 -0400
>>>>> From: LarryT <L02turner [at] comcast.net>
>>>>> To: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com
>>>>> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 456 issues
>>>>> Message-ID: <542B4437.2090907 [at] comcast.net>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>>>>> 
>>>>> A 550 parked next to me at a car even a couple of years ago and I was 
>>>>> amazed at how small it was.  We were in a early 90s E Class and it was 
>>>>> the same size or smaller.  More beautiful in person of course....
>>>>> 
>>>>> LarryT
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 9/30/2014 10:26 AM, Doug & Terri wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Charles notes about the 456 ". . . and nearly invisible in traffic."
>>>>> >
>>>>> > There was a time we was looking for an F550 or F575.  However with its 
>>>>> > front end overhang it cannot negotiate my steep driveway.  Alas.  BUT, 
>>>>> > that said, in my internet research travels one owner quipped "One 
>>>>> > thing nice about the F550 is you will not be bothered in store parking 
>>>>> > lots with hordes of gawkers or pick-up trucks trying to race you on 
>>>>> > the road ways - - no one knows it is a Ferrari."  Ah ah ah  I still 
>>>>> > like the car -- alas yet again.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > DOUG
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *From:*Ferrari [mailto:ferrari-bounces+dnt=dock.net [at] 
>>>>> > ferrarilist.com] 
>>>>> > *On Behalf Of *Charles Perry
>>>>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:02 AM
>>>>> > *To:* DOUG
>>>>> > *Cc:* The FerrariList
>>>>> > *Subject:* Re: [Ferrari] 456 issues
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As I understand it, it is the window regulators that are the problems. 
>>>>> > They fail and are heinously expensive to replace ($2-3k each). When 
>>>>> > failed, the windows can't go up and/or down and I believe the 456 does 
>>>>> > drop the window a few mm when opening or closing doors to clear the 
>>>>> > body seals. If the regulators are broken it can't do that, risking 
>>>>> > breaking expensive glass. Susie's Boxster has the same issue but much 
>>>>> > cheaper to fix.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Don't know anything about the auto trans, except that Ferrari sources 
>>>>> > them elsewhere, so I'm sure some of the same problems as plagued the 
>>>>> > 400/412 series apply.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > They do get the sticky interior problem that all Ferraris of that era 
>>>>> > had, but that's easy to address.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Some more info here:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.ferraris-online.com/Articles/SCM_0212.shtml
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/used-car-buying-guides/used-car-buying-guide-ferrari-456-1992-2003
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Seems like a strong value if you can deal with the blandish styling. I 
>>>>> > had Stan Luthi's dark green/tan car for a few days some years back and 
>>>>> > it was a lot of fun, and nearly invisible in traffic. Good q-ship road 
>>>>> > trip car for sure...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *From:*Ferrari 
>>>>> > [mailto:ferrari-bounces+charles=carolina-sound.com [at] 
>>>>> > ferrarilist.com] 
>>>>> > *On Behalf Of *Fellippe Galletta
>>>>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:33 AM
>>>>> > *To:* Charles Perry
>>>>> > *Cc:* The FerrariList
>>>>> > *Subject:* [Ferrari] 456 issues
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A coworker asked me about the 456, and I told him it's a wonderful 
>>>>> > value for a modern V12 F.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Just that it has a few potential issues that could quickly add up to 
>>>>> > the price of the car, hehe.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > So what were they exactly?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I remember something about the windows, maybe windshield too. Also the 
>>>>> > auto trans could be an expensive rebuild (but nobody wants an auto 
>>>>> > 456!).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I can't imagine it would be too bad.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Looking at the V12 universe, it looks to be a good value. Even better 
>>>>> > than the Maranello possibly...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > FG
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>>>>> > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
>>>>> > and F1 Headlines
>>>>> > http://www.F1Headlines.com/
>>>>> 
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> <http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20140930/fcb42efd/attachment.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>>>> 
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>>>>> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> End of Ferrari Digest, Vol 98, Issue 85
>>>>> ***************************************
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>>>>> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomerof4%40bellsouth.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
>>>>> and F1 Headlines
>>>>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/
>>>> 
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>>>> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/fellippe.galletta%40gmail.com
>>>> 
>>>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
>>>> and F1 Headlines
>>>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/britt2asa%40aol.com
> 
> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
> and F1 Headlines
> http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.ferrarilist.com/pipermail/ferrari/attachments/20141002/c220750b/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/listinfo/ferrari


------------------------------

End of Ferrari Digest, Vol 99, Issue 7
**************************************

____________________________________________________________
Odd Trick Fights Diabetes
&#34;Unique&#34; Proven Method To Control Blood Sugar In 3 Weeks. Watch Video.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3231/542e08b7a36408b71464st01duc

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.