Re: "But I am ok with coming up with a better energy infrastructure because I view it as a national security issue." | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Anthony Bauco (tbauco![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:45:51 -0800 (PST) |
Absolutely that should be a part of it. Small reactors within a network of medium sized reactors within a network of already existing large reactors. The grid is long overdue for an upgrade and this should be part of that upgrade. Add solar to that and you have a nice setup.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, 2:02 PM <georgedodson [at] comcast.net> wrote:
Here is the first, ready to go solution and one to hope for: Nuclear Fission
in Small Modular (Factory Floor) Reactors and, if it ever scales to
production, Fusion,
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/tbauco%40gmail.com
Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Re: "But I am ok with coming up with a better energy infrastructure because I view it as a national security issue." georgedodson, January 11 2022
- Re: "But I am ok with coming up with a better energy infrastructure because I view it as a national security issue." Anthony Bauco, January 11 2022
-
Re: "But I am ok with coming up with a better energy infrastructure because I view it as a national security issue." Rick Moseley, January 11 2022
- Re: "But I am ok with coming up with a better energy infrastructure because I view it as a national security issue." Anthony Bauco, January 11 2022
- Re: "But I am ok with coming up with a better energy infrastructure because I view it as a national security issue." Hunter Schultz, January 11 2022
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.