Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms
From: BRIGANDBAR (BRIGANDBARaol.com)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
 
In a message dated 9/19/2006 5:44:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
dave [at] davehanda.com writes:

Actually  any qualified SWAT officer should be well trained in one handed 
malfunction  drills.  BUT, they may wish to go to the back up handgun because 
it 
is  FASTER than doing the clearance drills one handed, not because they are  
incapable of performing them.






Dave:
 
What you say is true if the injuries are limited to that single area, but  
trauma may be more generalized. The speed consideration is a valid point,  
however, as well as, depending upon how his gear is worn, accessibility to  
additional magazines, available cover, etc. I didn't mean to imply that the 
only  
reason why a backup firearm is used in tac ops is injury, it is just one of  
them.
 
My assumption that you and I are perhaps the only "qualified SWAT officers"  
on the list has a high probability of a validity. I do believe that anyone who 
 is not "duty bound" and who cannot clearly articulate a valid probability of 
 success in a conflict environment should make disengagement their principle  
tactic. Additionally, it would be a rare circumstance in which an armed 
civilian  would be anything but a distraction to trained personnel in any 
emergency 
 situation. Imagine trying to first determine which armed individual is an  
adversary and which is a well-meaning but untrained coincidental participant,  
then worrying about what an untrained individual will do with a firearm under  
stress, and third, what collateral damage will that third party do during the 
 course of events. 
 
Dr. Steve  

1964 Rolls  Royce Silver Cloud III    1975 Pontiac GV Conv.
1980 MB  450SL                 1982 RR  Corniche
1994 F-350 Powerstroke  4x4          1996  Bronco
2000 Lincoln Town  Car                   2004  Excursion
1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder
+ Audrey's 3x MB's

Dr.  Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI
Director, Forensic Sciences  Laboratory
Explosives Engineering Technologies

Legal  Notice:


This message does not constitute legal or other professional  advice, nor 
does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or  fiduciary 
relationship between the sender and/or any other  party

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including  attachments) is covered by 
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S.  C., Sections 2510-2521, 
and 
is intended only for the person or entity to which  it is addressed, and may 
contain confidential or privileged material. Any  unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or  distribution is prohibited. 
If you are not the intended recipient contact the  sender by reply e-mail and 
destroy all copies of the original message. If you  are the intended recipient 
but do not wish to receive communications through  this medium please so 
advise the sender immediately.

Electronic  Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be 
guaranteed  to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability 
for 
any errors  or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a result 
of its  electronic (e-mail) transmission.

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.