Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BRIGANDBAR (BRIGANDBAR![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:23:20 -0700 (PDT) |
In a message dated 9/19/2006 5:44:48 P.M. Central Standard Time, dave [at] davehanda.com writes: Actually any qualified SWAT officer should be well trained in one handed malfunction drills. BUT, they may wish to go to the back up handgun because it is FASTER than doing the clearance drills one handed, not because they are incapable of performing them. Dave: What you say is true if the injuries are limited to that single area, but trauma may be more generalized. The speed consideration is a valid point, however, as well as, depending upon how his gear is worn, accessibility to additional magazines, available cover, etc. I didn't mean to imply that the only reason why a backup firearm is used in tac ops is injury, it is just one of them. My assumption that you and I are perhaps the only "qualified SWAT officers" on the list has a high probability of a validity. I do believe that anyone who is not "duty bound" and who cannot clearly articulate a valid probability of success in a conflict environment should make disengagement their principle tactic. Additionally, it would be a rare circumstance in which an armed civilian would be anything but a distraction to trained personnel in any emergency situation. Imagine trying to first determine which armed individual is an adversary and which is a well-meaning but untrained coincidental participant, then worrying about what an untrained individual will do with a firearm under stress, and third, what collateral damage will that third party do during the course of events. Dr. Steve 1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III 1975 Pontiac GV Conv. 1980 MB 450SL 1982 RR Corniche 1994 F-350 Powerstroke 4x4 1996 Bronco 2000 Lincoln Town Car 2004 Excursion 1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder + Audrey's 3x MB's Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory Explosives Engineering Technologies Legal Notice: This message does not constitute legal or other professional advice, nor does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or fiduciary relationship between the sender and/or any other party Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise the sender immediately. Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.
- Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms, (continued)
-
Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Dave Handa, September 19 2006
- Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Martin Stark, September 19 2006
- Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Dave Handa, September 19 2006
-
Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Dave Handa, September 19 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.