Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol ... | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: LS (lashdeep![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:32:52 -0800 (PST) |
I'll respectfully disagree with BMWs. I've recently had a mint, low mileage E34 540i and it was put together by chimps. The glue (F-ING GLUE!!!!) in the rear door panels leather inserts was falling off after only 67k garaged miles. There were many wiring harnesses routed directly over sharp sheet metal panels with no mid route fastening. They were almost designed to wiggle loose due to their own weight. The list goes on. And why only spot welds on certain frame panels? The E68 5 series is worse!! I can agree with the "ride, handling, driving feel" portion of your statement. The euro cars have fantastic chassis engineering and ergos. They are miles away from domestics and the Japanese. The powertrains aren't particularly clever at all. Don't ZF automatics last about as long as air filters? Wait, that clunk when reapplying the gas after a coast is normal? Cracked radiator necks? The list goes on and on... The euros have the best *materials* but the build quality is barely better than the *best* domestic cars. Don't believe the hype. If my E34 was a manual trans, I probably would've kept it for the stable and composed chassis, the awesome brakes and the top end rush. I really enjoyed that car...but I didn't believe for 1 second that it was better put together than my old 240SX or even my POS '97 Mustang. And there were mechanical development problems (4.0 liter engine recall, radiators, auto trans) that made you wonder. A co-worker is an E36 M3 nutcase. His list of unscheduled repairs are even longer! Leaky power steering rack? Climate control display replacements, guibos/center diff bearing, etc.. My convertible E30 was much better built. What happened? Things are not the same anymore. Are there domestics with these issues? Of course, most are worse! Are there Japanese cars with these issues? Of course! If we're going to praise certain makes, let's praise them for their actual positive attributes today, not the reputation they had in 1988. LS uxton [at] BuxtonMotorsports.com> wrote: > As many steps forward as US car companies have taken, they are still > miles behind the Germans in luxury, ride, handling, driving feel, panel > gaps, fit and finish and overall quality of interior bits, leather, > carpet, etc. One of my clients bought a new Cadillac XLR-V for right at > > $100K and I couldn't believe how cheap the interior looked, felt and > even smelled. I drove another clients 2007 Cadillac Escalade back to > his house after a detail and was equally unimpressed with that > interior. But that thing is FAST for a big SUV. Hell, it was fast for > a small car! Great exhaust note too. > > Brian > > > > LtWacko [at] aol.com wrote: > > >I whole heartedly agree with American Iron being superior in > performance in > >a straight line. I LOVE the CTS-V and SRT-8's, but luxury is not the > same. > >I couldn't believe it when one of my friends with a CTS-V found the > Caddy not > >luxurious enough! Surprised the heck out of me. I thought they were > fine > >and actually envious. He is looking to trade the car in for an Audi > A8L. I > >guess he doesn't care about reliability. Performance and luxury in > one car > >that is somewhat affordable is not a priority for him. He is going to > get > >another Vette Z (old one replaced with CTS-V) to satisfy the speed > need and get a > >"nicer" luxury car for clients (real estate agent). > > > >In a message dated 12/29/2006 11:02:41 A.M. Central Standard Time, > >lashdeep [at] yahoo.com writes: > > > >I wish you guys were in DC right now...this Mallet Caddie CTS will tow > a 740 > >faster than a 750 will run unladen. > > > >Interestingly, two recent E39 M5 owners have traded up to stock CTS-Vs > for > >more electrical reliability, better fuel economy and cheaper > maintenance...all > >with the same level of performance. > > > >I thought the CTS-V was faster? I know if they don't handle as well > but > >that's only at the limits which most drivers never reach anyway. BMW M > Car and > >reliability usually can only be used in the same sentence negatively > lately. > > > > > > > >525 RWHP and 20mpg. GM engine mgmt is pretty impressive nowadays. Have > > >modern, alloy V8s rendered forced induction obsolete? Is turbocharging > the old > >school method for making an engine both efficient and powerful? > >No, you can turbocharge the newer motors for even higher levels of > >performance! Can you say 750 HP plus Caddy? > > > > > > > >Z06: 26mpg, 3100lbs, 505bhp > >S2000: 28mpg, 2850lbs, 240 bhp > > > >Buddy's stock S2000 spanked my 740iL all over the powerband and I have > a > >quicker than stock gear! I > >NEED a V12... > > > > > > > >Why is an LS1 powered 3rd Gen RX7, lighter, more powerful and more > fuel > >efficient than a twin turbo 13B rotary powered RX7? > > > >Was the opening scene of Apocalypse Now really the destruction of the > Kurtz > >compound? > > > >Who has answers? > > > >Women, but they are too smart to come down to our level (according to > my > >girlfriend)! > > > >Rodney > > > > > > > >LS > > > >www.exhaust.tv > > > > > >----- Original Message ---- > >From: "LtWacko [at] aol.com" <LtWacko [at] aol.com> > >To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > >Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > >Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:37:00 AM > >Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari Digest, Vol 5, Issue 51 > > > > > >In a message dated 12/29/2006 8:03:11 A.M. Central Standard Time, > >ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com writes: > > > >5. The 750 V12 has 296 HP. The stock 540i V8 has 282 and my El Tweako > > >factory setup 290: 2% less power than the V12 and way less mass. The > > >V8 likes revs and will imitate a V12 just fine at 3500 - 5500 RPM. > >Rev limiter is about 5300 in 1st, 6300 after that. I suspect Koala > >installs the manual EPROMs. > > > > > >HP doesn't tell the whole story. Power curve baby! 750 will walk a > 740 > >all > >day long from 50 MPH to limiter. You will actually outdrag a 750 > with a > >740 > >off the line in distance. To 60 MPH in time is close, but that is > because > >the 750 is charging hard catching the 740 then blowing by it as if > the guy > >in > >the 740 threw out an anchor. Yes, this is based on multiple ACTUAL > runs > >side > >by side. No magazine performance comparisons of numbers. NO > barstool > >racing. You will feel like a little girl when you play with the big > boys > >at 80MPH > >plus. I can't believe how long I have to wait to get to 130 MPH in > my > >740iL > >and yes, I do this on a weekly basis so I need it! I was > disappointed from > >day one. All I could afford at the time was a 740 and it had to be a > > >steal > >at that and my 750 started getting some miles on it and serious repair > > >bills. > >If you can find a quicker diff cheap and you don't mind the lower HWY > MPG, > >it's well worth the grin factor. > > > >It's like the old S-Class argument between the S420 and the S500. > S420 > >owners wish they had the S500 and S500 owners never looked back on the > > >extra > >money they spent. > > > >Ain't no replacement for displacement! > > > >Rodney > >_________________________________________________________________ > >To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > >http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com > > > >Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > >http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/brianbuxton%40buxtonmotorsports.com > > > >Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > > > > > > > > -- > Brian E. Buxton > > President, Buxton Motorsports, Inc . > www.BuxtonMotorsports.com > (812) 476-2281 x 209 > Member ThaList.com > > Managing Partner, Private Label Livery Services > www.PrivateLabelLimo.com > > President, Brian Buxton Enterprises, Inc. > Nationwide Enclosed Auto Transportation > www.BuxtonMotorsports.com/storage-transportation.php > > Founder & Past President > === message truncated === www.exhaust.tv __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-
Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol ... LtWacko, December 29 2006
-
Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol ... Brian E. Buxton, December 29 2006
- Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol ... LS, December 30 2006
- Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: FerrariDigest, Vol ... jimshadow, December 30 2006
- Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: FerrariDigest, Vol ... LarryT, December 30 2006
-
Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol ... Brian E. Buxton, December 29 2006
- Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol ... LS, December 29 2006
- Re: BMW Mods/Forced Induction/Modern V8s...Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol ... LtWacko, December 30 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.