Re: F40 vs. the new punks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fellippe Galletta (fellippe.galletta![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT) |
On 7/6/07, Steve Jenkins <steve [at] stevejenkins.com> wrote:
I haven't driven all the cars on that list you had, but even if it weren't
FG
Already added brakes, 18" wheels, tires, bigger turbos, and software. Almost at 500HP @ the rear wheels (what's that at the crank?). Hoping new exhaust pushes me over.
Wow...very impressive!
You have around 588 at the crank, assuming 15% driveline loss...
I haven't driven all the cars on that list you had, but even if it weren't
as fast, it would still be way more fun. :)
:)
Turbo LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Do you like the turbo lag? I drove a 911 Turbo last year and the way the power comes on is very "interesting"....I can now see the appeal of turbo motors, although I'm not sure I'm completely sold on the concept.
Was gonna say if you wanted to eliminate lag you could probably re-work the turbo plumbing....is the car slow off boost?
I remember the FORZA article on the 288 GTO where the author said off boost any car could take it, but once the boost came on, it was sure to "frighten the uninitiated"...
Fair assessment?
:)
FG
- Re: F40 vs. the new punks, (continued)
-
Re: F40 vs. the new punks Peter Pless, July 2 2007
-
Re: F40 vs. the new punks philville dejazzd.com, July 3 2007
- Re: F40 vs. the new punks Peter Pless, July 3 2007
-
Re: F40 vs. the new punks philville dejazzd.com, July 3 2007
-
Re: F40 vs. the new punks Steve Jenkins, July 5 2007
- Re: F40 vs. the new punks Fellippe Galletta, July 6 2007
- Re: F40 vs. the new punks LarryT, July 6 2007
- Re: F40 vs. the new punks Steve Jenkins, July 6 2007
- Re: F40 vs. the new punks A.J. Merrifield, July 6 2007
-
Re: F40 vs. the new punks Peter Pless, July 2 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.