Re: Ferrari California | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Stephen Sherman (sherman![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT) |
DITTO!
Back in 86 I paid $5 a gallon in Germany, about the same time tubo charged 1.5 L 12 cyl F1 cars
cranked out 1200 HP.
Stephen
----- Original Message ----- From: "ken rentiers" <rentiers [at] mac.com>
To: "Stephen" <sherman [at] wildblue.net>
Cc: <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari California
Back in 86 I paid $5 a gallon in Germany, about the same time tubo charged 1.5 L 12 cyl F1 cars
cranked out 1200 HP.
Stephen
----- Original Message ----- From: "ken rentiers" <rentiers [at] mac.com>
To: "Stephen" <sherman [at] wildblue.net>
Cc: <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari California
Great idea, Dan.
While we're at it, in a world where gasoline is $4.00 a gallon, how badly do we need all the gee-gaws that add pound after unwanted pound, and the barrage of superfluous electrical stuff that mandates a second battery, just to run the thermoelectric cooler in the armrest, the parking system and the digital entertainment subwoofers. How about a California Spyder weighing oh - 2800 pounds with a cloth top, manly manual steering and transmission (hydraulics are heavy) sporting a 2.5 L V12 which with today's tech could easily output close to 400 HP.
I'm tired of cars that look like they beat them with an ugly stick.
k
On May 14, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Dan Warlick wrote:
I have a '61 250GT PF Cabriolet. (Series II of course). The car is arguably and basically a 250 California Spider without the gill vents and a short windshield. I see no resemblance what so ever except for maybe the hood scoop. It would seem that the American big 3 retro designs (i.e. mustang, challenger, camaro) received much praise and warm welcomes. Perhaps Ferrari would view such a design move as a rehash or some sort of regression. It would be very nice to have a small, light, hand built from exotic materials, convertible that actually is a design study on classic Ferrari design. It looks like the new kids in the design houses are only reflecting on generic elements such as "it had little vents in the fenders" or "it had a hood scoop" and not taking notice of the overall liquidity of design. Even in the F430 nose it's NOT anything like the 1961/62 Tipo 156 Shark Nose F1 cars at all. I think I saw all of this coming but didn't recognize it about 20 years ago when all the younger guys began "customizing" and lowering trucks while we were still actually turning wrenches. The passion was fading......Someone's parents weren't doing their job passing the torch. The answer to "What's under your hood?" changed from a conversation of; changing out SB400 cranks for SB350's making long rod 388's and 377's/cams solid or hyd?/ Carb CFM but u hadda rejet".........to " I got this awesome chrome stick-on engine dress up kit at Pep Boys.....look at my neon light under the bumper..I can fit my head in my tail pipe...I got pink plug wires and this really cool heads up display big screen TV....blah blah blah..! Did these guys grow up to be the designers? I am becoming more and more disappointed with all new car designs with the exception of as Charles has so astutely pointed out, Maserati and Aston. Is there any way we could pass around a PDF file or Word/Works file and see what we could come up with? I mean it doesn't make us Jimmy Glick' but it might turn out to be a pretty damn good interpretation of what Ferrari should have built considering our vast geographic locations and differing opinions. ----- Original Message ----- From: "LarryT" <l02turner [at] comcast.net> To: "Daniel" <edwf430 [at] bellsouth.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:39 AM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari California
It's time to watch "Ferrari, Victory By Design" again. In addition to the 250GT Ken mentioned, the 250P, 275GTB, 330s the various 312's and the 365s, etc. can be seen and heard. IMO, once we went to car design by government edict we began to slowly move to a world of cookie cutter car design in approx. 1968 .
Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D) www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net 800-583-8601 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Rentiers" <rentiers [at] mac.com> To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:03 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari California
Consider the 250 SWB. No character lines, no supernumerary exhaust tips or retractible hardtop causing the trunk to look like a turtle humped over fucking. Just pure sweet simple unadorned 100% pur sang car. How hard can it be to do that again?
k On May 13, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Charles Perry wrote:
Bleah. Saturn Sky meets Ferris Bueller body kit. I miss the beautiful Ferraris...
I'll agree that the modern Ferraris are more striking in person, but I don't think there's been a beautiful one since the 355. I think Maserati and Aston Martin have cornered the market on beautiful for some time now...
-- charles
-----Original Message----- From: Dan Warlick [mailto:edwf430 [at] bellsouth.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:03 AM To: Charles Perry Cc: The FerrariList Subject: [Ferrari] Ferrari California
http://www.ferraricalifornia.com/webapp/downloads.htm?locale=en_GB
The photos are out!!!!! Wow!!! _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/charles% 40carolina- sound.com
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http:// www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/ _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rentiers% 40mail.com
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner% 40comcast.net
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/edwf430% 40bellsouth.net
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rentiers% 40mail.com
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
uncle ken
ï
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/sherman%40wildblue.net
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Ferrari California, (continued)
-
Re: Ferrari California Ken Rentiers, May 13 2008
- Re: Ferrari California LarryT, May 14 2008
- Re: Ferrari California Dan Warlick, May 14 2008
- Re: Ferrari California ken rentiers, May 14 2008
- Re: Ferrari California Stephen Sherman, May 14 2008
- Re: Ferrari California Tom Reynolds, May 14 2008
-
Re: Ferrari California Ken Rentiers, May 13 2008
- Re: Ferrari California LarryT, May 14 2008
- Re: Ferrari California Stephen Sherman, May 14 2008
- Re: Ferrari California Dan Warlick, May 14 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.