Re: Nuclear | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Doug and Terri Anderson (dnt![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:22:34 -0700 (PDT) |
Rick sez "PS: Long notes typed on a BlackBerry are hell! "
I AM impressed - and with no errors yet! Man, I can't type a grocery list without making 20 errors on a BB. You nimble fingered old dog you. As Ferrari Bubba would say - I bet you have an unlisted phone number. heh heh
DOUG Oh - PS - good post.
----- Original Message ----- From: <rolindsay [at] yahoo.com>
To: "Doug and Terri Anderson" <dnt [at] dock.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>; <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Nuclear
In my original note where I wrote the N-word (nuclear), I was trying to be more broad in scope than to recommend building more nuclear power plants. I meant then, as now, to say that chemical energy sources like coal and oil have a finite life AND the term of that life will wain to near extinction within the liftspan of the younger ListMembers here! It then folllows that there are only two options; (1) find another source of high energy or, (2) consume so much less that the other sources like wind and photoelectric will suffice. And while (2) is a better, smarter solution, it is not in the nature of humans. We want more, not less.
So my original note was to say, the only other source of huge energy potential (known to us today) is stored in the very center of atoms. Extracting it in what is in essence a controled nuclear explosion is primative and not far from our first attempts with chemical energy. Its huddling around the nuclear campfire. What we need is the atomic version of a Ferrari, safely and in a very controlled environment, releasing the energy within the atom. We're not there yet but it may be the only path to providing the amount of energy humans demand.
I'll put the 2-cents this opinion is worth on your tab...
Rick PS: Long notes typed on a BlackBerry are hell!
------Original Message------ From: Doug and Terri Anderson To: Rick Lindsay Cc: The FerrariList Sent: Aug 10, 2008 1:16 AM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Nuclear
It was July, 1979 at dinner time in Bruno Czechoslovakia. Seven of us -
four of us from San Francisco comprised of two native born, one Polak and
one Hungarian - the other three were two Hungarian kids on honeymoon and a
Frenchman. The Frenchman made it interesting - he was the head dude in
charge of nuclear reactor welding in France. He was in Bruno for a welding
convention. While none of us could speak all the tables languages, we got
along ok - most interesting dinner. OH, the reason for this post - what I
learned is France uses many many nuclear plants - why? lack of rivers for
hydro power. AND their plants are the "other" type from the ones used in
the US. A fellow well known in Porsche 356 circles, The Maestro, Harry
Pellow, was working with a company doing the French design. US decided to
go the other way - he's out of a job and he becomes a MIT graduate writing
books such as "Inside the Inner Circle" a think binder tome of 356 engine
trivia. Question for our group - what is "the other way" to design a
nuclear plant. Has something to do with using sodium rather than water. As
in sodium filled exhaust valve stems.
Onward
DOUG
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Lindsay" <rolindsay [at] yahoo.com>
To: "DOUG" <dnt [at] dock.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Nuclear
Yep. You've got it!
The biggest issue with nuclear is the word "nuclear". It scares people to death. Perhaps we should rename it "friendly" power. Yea, that's it. Let's campaign for "friendly fision power".
rick
--- LtWacko <ltwacko [at] aol.com> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________The key to this working is enough investment in safety to make the greenies give it the thumbs up. Then bring down the price of "Mr. Fusion" so I can cheaply power up my flux capacitor, go back in time and then buy some oil futures... naturally I'll use an F-car rather than that stainless steel rolling pylon.
Rodney
In a message dated 08/09/08 14:05:44 Central Daylight Time, ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com writes: + The only viable solution is nuclear.
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rolindsay%40yahoo.comTo unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/dnt%40dock.net
Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
- Re: Digital camera - point and shoot, (continued)
- Re: Digital camera - point and shoot LarryT, August 11 2008
- Re: Digital camera - point and shoot Hunter N. Schultz, August 11 2008
- Re: Digital camera - point and shoot Paul Bennett, August 11 2008
- Re: Digital camera - point and shoot Dave Craig, August 11 2008
- Re: Nuclear red5hilser, August 10 2008
- Re: Nuclear Doug and Terri Anderson, August 10 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.