Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing TheirGood Looks? ) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: jashburne (jashburne![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:44:33 -0800 (PST) |
"All", "none" "always" and "never" are all lies. The point is 1. There already is a very substantial taxpayer paid support system of unemployment, medicare, welfare and other safety net programs to address all of the examples you cited. 2. There is a huge amount of waste, fraud and inefficiency in those programs. Any expansion of those government programs paid for by taxpayers should only be considered very carefully in the context of the limitations on government as framed by our founding fathers and only as a last resort. 3. The main point is not to shift the tax burden to fewer and fewer people. When nearly half of the people pay no income taxes at all in an economy with 6 pct unemployment that means there are a LOT of people with jobs who don't pay taxes. That is just wrong as it disenfranchises the higher earners who pay for that 40 percent's share of their government. See, conservatives can be disenfranchised too! John Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Mike Fleischer <themightytoe [at] gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:05:16 To: <jashburne [at] aol.com> Cc: The FerrariList<ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) OK I agree the system probably does need reform. The point I can not agree with here is that these people are all freeloaders... Or that if they get help they suddenly would become freeloaders... Brian E. Buxton wrote: > There should be help for them, but if the Gov't got all of the > freeloaders off the "payrolls" there wouldn't need to be a tax > increase to help those who truly need help. There would be a surplus > based on what is already taken from our taxes! And I think welfare or > any other such type assistance should be incrementally phased out. > One year is plenty of time to find a job or get back on your feet. So > in Jan you get $2,000, Feb you get $1,834, March you get $1,668, and > so on. And during this time you have 2 months to find a job and you > must stay employed in order to receive benefits. And you must be > subject to random drug tests. Longer programs can be implemented for > those who truly need more help, but this plan would take care of 90% > of those who are down on their luck. > > Brian > > > > Mike Fleischer wrote: >> I agree with Ric on that point also, but the piece he is missing: >> >> The teenage mom struggling to raise her kid when their dad left them? >> >> The father who lost his job at the local plant, mostly due to poor >> management by his company, and finds the only job available to him is >> to serve burgers at local McDonalds as his skills are no longer >> useable or marketable and his saving will only last him a year? >> >> The pensioner, who's lifes savings were stolen away by some shady >> doctors or Enron executives? >> >> What is your answer for them? Fuck you, your screwed? >> >> >> >> Brian E. Buxton wrote: >>> I would have to agree with Ric here. Having "compassion" for >>> someone who is living a life based on the consequences of their own >>> decisions allows that person to not be required to take >>> responsibility for their decisions. If they are poor or can't pay >>> their own bills then someone else will! >>> >>> B >>> >>> >>> >>> Ric Rainbolt wrote: >>> >>> >>>> At 05:50 PM 11/12/2008, you wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I fully agree our system is not fair and it really is a form of >>>>> charity >>>>> to a large extent, no question. It seems the arguments here are >>>>> based >>>>> on just the numbers, but what is missing here is any compassion >>>>> for your >>>>> fellow man. Sure I work hard to provide for my family and I worry >>>>> about >>>>> their financial security and future but I also recognize that I >>>>> live in >>>>> a society with other people and reading this I recall an old adage my >>>>> parents used to tell me: "the world needs ditch diggers too"... >>>>> >>>>> >>>> And therein is the basis of the problem. This is a worldwide >>>> epidemic of misconception, IMHO. >>>> >>>> Compassion for my fellow man is NOT to support someone who doesn't >>>> bother to get an education, or bother to not drink beer that costs >>>> more than his gross wages. Is it MY fault that he's a ditch digger? >>>> Perhaps I spent years honing my profitable technical skills while >>>> he skipped school and drank his way into his situation? Now I'm >>>> literally robbed to pay for his misdeeds or lack of proactive >>>> foresight. >>>> >>>> It should for ME to decide when to allow the gift of charity to >>>> emanate from MY compassion. I do NOT want to have money taken BY >>>> FORCE by large bureaucracy and given willy-nilly to whoever makes >>>> up the best boo-hoo sob story. I've lived around and worked with >>>> MANY fully able-bodied individuals that were taking money from the >>>> system via systematic fraud (workmans comp, Medicare, etc.). Then >>>> there's the whole part about federal funding for all kinds of crap >>>> that I would NEVER EVER support if given a choice in the matter. I >>>> give many thousands to charities each year... ones of MY choosing. >>>> >>>> There is NO charity in someone taking my money to give to someone >>>> else (and in many cases, keep some for themselves for being so >>>> righteous). That's playing shift-the-burden-of-my-guilt complex. >>>> Far too common. >>>> >>>> RR >>>> _________________________________________________________________ >>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >>>> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/brianbuxton%40buxtonmotorsports.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines >>>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > > Brian E. Buxton, President > > > > Buxton Motorsports, Inc. <http://www.buxtonmotorsports.com> > > 301 North Royal Ave. > > Buxton Plaza > > Evansville, IN 47715-2866 > > (812) 476-2281 x 209 office > > (812) 760-5513 mobile > > > > Member ThaList.com <http://www.ThaList.com> > > > > President, Brian Buxton Enterprises, Inc. > <http://www.buxtonmotorsports.com/storage-transportation.php> > > Nationwide Enclosed Auto Transportation > > > > Founder & Past President > > SO. IN Region PCA > _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/jashburne%40aol.com Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ), (continued)
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Rick Lindsay, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Mike Fleischer, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Brian E. Buxton, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Mike Fleischer, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing TheirGood Looks? ) jashburne, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Brian E. Buxton, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Mike Fleischer, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Brian E. Buxton, November 13 2008
- Re: Barstool Economics (was RE: Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? ) Steve Jenkins, November 13 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.