| Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: LarryT (l02turner |
|
| Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:44:28 -0800 (PST) | |
Ric -your comments are exactly why I added the comment <<figures lie and liars figure - so be careful how you read it.>>
As you pointed out the flaws in the link I provided, I realize what a poor choice of links it was -
Sincerely, Larry T (74 911, 91 300D 2.5T) www.youroil.net Oil Analysis Kits & Porsche Posters/Weber parts .----- Original Message ----- From: "Ric Rainbolt" <ricrainbolt [at] gmail.com>
To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 1:42 AMSubject: Re: [Ferrari] Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please)
Sorry, but this wreaks of cherry picked numbers.
In the first section, they talk about the top 400 richest taxpayers.
What the heck kind of sample is that? The top 400 probably have the
MOST access to shelters and probably 95% of their income is capital
gains, NOT wages. So 27% is actually "about right" in terms of the tax
code. This TINY group paid $16 BILLION in taxes, according to their
own numbers.
Also, if you look a the graph in the section "Who Pays Taxes?" You can
clearly see, as percentage, the top 400 pay a much higher percentage
of Federal Taxes (blue section), it's only Social Security (green
section) that makes the huge difference.
The next section talks about the top 0.01% of the population,
income-wise. These samples represent a tiny, tiny fraction of the
population and a very small amount of the total tax burden.
As for the top 13,400 richest, I don't care what kind of laws you
pass, you're not going the get their money, they're going to keep
getting richer as well. They have the means and the staff to safely
guard their collective wealth. If you pass laws to try to punish, err
"Access" their wealth, you're only going to damage people making much
less, such as the aforementioned upper 10% of wage earners. The
ultra-wealthy can always move money around the world and exploit all
available global shelters.
With insane quotes like this: "The Federal Estate tax is the only tax
that directly combats the problem of excessive wealth accumulation."
it's easy to see where this article's writer(s) loyalties lie.
Picking the top 0.01% (or worse yet, the top 400) is designed purely
to enrage Joe Plumber's envy and incite class warfare. If you look at
the actual dollar amounts this group pays, it probably dwarfs the
lower 20, 30 or 40 percentiles.
Showing state and local taxes as a percentage of household income is
misleading, because they're usually property taxes, which is a
fixed-rate tax in most circumstances.
I also find it quite curious that they use different date ranges to
illustrate different points. This is usually a hallmark of cherry
picking, as you get to pick the means and extremes that best support
your claims.
Also this doozey: "Income distribution in the United States is the
most unequal among all developed nations, according to OECD data." The
If you want unbiased numbers, to read from yourself, without editorial
bias. Check out the web sites of the CBO or IRS. All the data is
available in tabular format, and is broken down into reasonable groups
(5, 10 and 20 percentile groups).
RR
At 10:36 PM 11/15/2008, LarryT wrote:
Here's some charts and info that purports to be accurate for year
2000.
[1]http://www.askquestions.org/articles/taxes/
As someone said, figures lie and liars figure - so be careful how
you read
it.
So I assme there's more than 1 way to put these numbers together -
Enjoy
Sincerely,
Larry T (74 911, 91 300D 2.5T)
[2]www.youroil.net Oil Analysis Kits &
Porsche Posters/Weber parts
References
1. http://www.askquestions.org/articles/taxes/
2. http://www.youroil.net/
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net
Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please), (continued)
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) Rich, November 13 2008
- Message not available
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content (Please) philville dejazzd.com, November 15 2008
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) LarryT, November 15 2008
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) Ric Rainbolt, November 15 2008
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) LarryT, November 16 2008
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content (Please) red5hilser, November 16 2008
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) LarryT, November 16 2008
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) Steve Jenkins, November 17 2008
- Re: Lets change the headers to reflect the content(Please) David G. Cole, November 17 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.