Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: E M (pokiebaron![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:38:56 -0800 (PST) |
My old 300E keeps motoring along too. When something does break, often parts cost little more than those for a Chev. Ed 911SC 2008/12/4 cmlf1 <cmlf1 [at] optonline.net> > My 450 SEL will not die either, and so simple to do just about anything! > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* E M <pokiebaron [at] gmail.com> > *To:* cmlf1 [at] optonline.net > *Cc:* ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com > *Sent:* Thursday, December 04, 2008 6:47 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with > Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on > Tuesday) > > You must drive an old Mercedes W140? hee hee. > > Ed > 911SC > > 2008/12/4 <cmlf1 [at] optonline.net> > >> The wire harnesses weigh in the hundreds of lbs. and have thousands of >> connections and numerous control modules etc. > > >> Carl >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Dan Warlick >> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008 1:39 pm >> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with >> Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on >> Tuesday) >> To: cmlf1 [at] optonline.net >> Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com >> >> > F40,F50,Enzo.......Other than the ultra collectibles like these >> > I am at a >> > loss LS. >> > Dan >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "LS" >> > To: "Daniel" >> > Cc: "The FerrariList" >> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:30 PM >> > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with >> > Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man >> > rambling on >> > Tuesday) >> > >> > >> > Most modern cars are plastic or sheet metal anyways. >> > >> > Look at any volume produced car like the M3, 911, Corvette, >> > etc.They share >> > so many parts with other models within their manufacturer. If >> > your 911GT3 >> > climate control unit goes bad, go on ebay and buy one off of a >> > parted out >> > Boxter for $50. >> > >> > I know nothing about Porsches, so I don't know if this example >> > is true, but >> > I'm making a point about shared platforms. >> > >> > A friend's Hartge E90 BMW cost $225k new and has stamped sheet >> > metal lower >> > control arms in the rear!!! Those might've cost $2.56 to produce >> > by a 7 yr >> > old in China. >> > >> > There are companies out there that will repair circuit boards >> > for modern >> > Euro car electronics. I had an Audi A4 B5 that had many >> > terrifying >> > electronic glitches. There were companies that would repair bad >> > pixels on >> > electronic displays, repair faulty ABS units and other nutty, >> > labor >> > intensive repairs for literally nothing. >> > >> > The point I'm making is that the complexity of modern cars is >> > spawning >> > support industries that we didn't have in the 1980s and 1990s. >> > >> > Add that to the sheer volume of cars being produced, even for >> > Ferrari, and >> > the chances of keeping your modern Chinese plastic F430 goes up >> > quite a bit. >> > (haha) >> > >> > The real question is...what car produced today is going to be >> > worth >> > restoring 20 yrs from now??? >> > >> > LS >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ---- >> > From: Rick Lindsay >> > To: LS >> > Cc: The FerrariList >> > Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 11:51:51 AM >> > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with >> > Electronics...was >> > Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) >> > >> > Oh, that's exactly what I'm doing. This car isn't worth crap as >> > a collector >> > car so any money spent is in the same category as installing >> > ceiling fans in >> > a house. They may be nice but don't add a cent to the value. I'm >> > going to >> > create a straight-fold foam-core mockup, tweaking the dimensions >> > for correct >> > alignment, then transfer that design to sheet metal, to be >> > formed and welded >> > in place. This is alsso known as, "a good excuse to buy a welder." >> > >> > >> > >> > rick >> > >> > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, LS wrote: >> > >> > > From: LS >> > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with >> > Electronics...was >> > > Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) >> > > To: "Rick Lindsay" >> > > Cc: "The FerrariList" >> > > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:46 AM >> > > It may be cheaper to make the part yourself, but it's >> > > certainly available in some way correct? >> > > >> > > LS >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ---- >> > > From: Rick Lindsay >> > > To: LS >> > > Cc: The FerrariList >> > > Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 10:58:40 AM >> > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car with >> > > Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old >> > > man rambling on Tuesday) >> > > >> > > Exactly! I have a 1961 Mercedes 180b. It has a rusty >> > > radius arm mount. The 4" x 12" piece of formed >> > > sheet metal is $800 from the M-B Classic Center - and that >> > > doesn't include the $79 mount point or the $39 rubber >> > > donut - and does not (obviously) include >> > > installation/welding. >> > > >> > > rick >> > > >> > > >> > > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, LS wrote: >> > > >> > > > From: LS >> > > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car >> > > with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. >> > > Old man rambling on Tuesday) >> > > > To: "rolindsay" >> > > > Cc: "The FerrariList" >> > > >> > > > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 9:48 AM >> > > > The $300k was to build an entire car from scratch with >> > > > custom bodywork, wheels, chassis, etc. >> > > > >> > > > The standalone engine management is much, much, >> > > > much cheaper and will be even less so in 20 yrs. >> > > > >> > > > Benz has started manufacturing all of their vintage >> > > parts >> > > > with super markups for old restorations to run the >> > > > private parts suppliers out of business. >> > > > >> > > > Why wouldn't Ferrari do the same thing? >> > > > >> > > > LS >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ________________________________ >> > > > From: Michael James >> > > >> > > > To: LS >> > > > Cc: The FerrariList >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 8:52:40 PM >> > > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car >> > > with >> > > > Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. >> > > Old >> > > > man rambling on Tuesday) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Agreed, but when it comes time to fix that F1 tranny >> > > in 20 >> > > > years, I don't think there will be many owners >> > > who >> > > > will pony-up anything close to $300K to fix or upgrade >> > > a 360 >> > > > F1 to keep it going. In another ten years, the 360 >> > > will be >> > > > lucky to maintain 20% of its original book-value. If >> > > the >> > > > value to reverse-engineer something surpasses the >> > > total >> > > > value of the car....the owner is screwed (or needs to >> > > be >> > > > REALLY in-love with the machine) . Much of the >> > > > Tranny's electronics are made by Magnetti Marelli >> > > - >> > > > they're not well-known for keeping 'NOS' >> > > parts >> > > > on the shelf forever. >> > > > >> > > > Then again, Ferrari and some of their OEM parts >> > > suppliers >> > > > are probably scratching their heads over how many of >> > > their >> > > > 'old cars' they thought would have disappeared >> > > long >> > > > ago are being preserved and restored in quantities >> > > close to >> > > > original production numbers. I know people who are >> > > > fabricating small plastic parts in their own >> > > garage for >> > > > vintage Ferraris...stuff that's been NLA for >> > > > years....the Marque is enjoying a very loyal and >> > > dedicated >> > > > fan base that considers NOTHING Ferrari-related to be >> > > > disposable. Will this continue? >> > > > >> > > > Hey, I hope I'm wrong....the future will be >> > > > interesting! >> > > > >> > > > M >> > > > >> > > > --- On Wed, 12/3/08, LS >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > From: LS >> > > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car >> > > with >> > > > Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. >> > > Old >> > > > man rambling on Tuesday) >> > > > To: "Michael" >> > > >> > > > Cc: "The FerrariList" >> > > > >> > > > Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 6:46 PM >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Jim, good to hear from you. Where have you been? >> > > > >> > > > I believe Michael James' concern was that as the >> > > modern >> > > > cars like the 360 >> > > > get older, the complex electronics would make >> > > restoration >> > > > or maint impossible. >> > > > >> > > > When most of these cars need such a solution, they >> > > will >> > > > probably be too old >> > > > (over 20 yrs in some states) to need to be emissions >> > > > compliant. >> > > > >> > > > The F355 will be eligible for antique tags in 6 yrs >> > > in my >> > > > state! >> > > > >> > > > Not only will the E30 M3 be driven on the street >> > > legally, >> > > > it will retain cats >> > > > and will pass 1989 tailpipe standards! Although, in >> > > his >> > > > area, he doesn't >> > > > have to comply because the car will be exempt. >> > > > >> > > > They are doing it simply as a challenge. >> > > > >> > > > Regarding the motor...they were on the dyno last month >> > > with >> > > > Dinan's new V10 >> > > > stroker, 5.6 liters I believe. They will have 600bhp >> > > in a >> > > > 2800lb E30 M3! >> > > > >> > > > He spent something like $30k for a new V10 motor just >> > > to >> > > > tune and setup the >> > > > Pectel mgmt. After 1 day of dyno testing by Pectel, it >> > > was >> > > > trash and they threw >> > > > the engine away. Onto engine #2... >> > > > >> > > > He has $300k into this whole project is not close to >> > > being >> > > > done. There is so >> > > > much custom bodywork, fabrication, and over the top >> > > detail >> > > > work in the whole >> > > > build. >> > > > >> > > > The next project is to redo one of the new M3s, throw >> > > away >> > > > all of the >> > > > factory crap and replace with real hardware. 700bhp >> > > turbo >> > > > 5.6 V10, hidden >> > > > rollcage, sequential Riccardo box, Comp dry >> > > sump-Accusump >> > > > system, carbon sun >> > > > visors, fire extinguisher on the A pillar, etc. >> > > > >> > > > Besides...emissions? Where's that male body spray? >> > > > >> > > > LS >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> > > > From: Jim Conforti >> > > > To: LS >> > > > Cc: The FerrariList >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 3:43:05 PM >> > > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] The Lifespan of a Modern Car >> > > with >> > > > Electronics...was Re: >> > > > Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on >> > > > Tuesday) >> > > > >> > > > At 09:00 AM 12/3/2008 -0800, LS wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >A friend of mine is building an '89 E30 M3 >> > > with a >> > > > 2008 BMW M5 v10 >> > > > >drivetrain and suspension. Instead of cracking the >> > > > factory ECU >> > > > >programming, he trashed it and is having Dinan >> > > assist >> > > > him with a >> > > > >standalone Pectel unit to takeover everything. It >> > > was >> > > > claimed that the >> > > > >modern V10 BMW could not run without proprietary >> > > BMW >> > > > ECU control. It is a >> > > > >ridiculous amount of work, but he is pioneering it >> > > for >> > > > the BMW world. It >> > > > >is only the beginning. >> > > > >> > > > Of course said vehicle can NEVER be operated on any >> > > > public highway in >> > > > the USA. >> > > > >> > > > (Seriously) >> > > > >> > > > The chances of getting caught are low, but if he >> > > does - >> > > > I hope he's got >> > > > incredibly >> > > > deep pockets because it's rather expensive >> > > fighting >> > > > the US EPA in court. >> > > > >> > > > This, of course, is why you DON'T >> > > "trash" >> > > > the factory ECU. >> > > > ROFLMAO. >> > > > >> > > > JC >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _________________________________________________________________ >> > > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, >> > > please >> > > > visit: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com> >> > >> > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >> > > > and F1 Headlines >> > > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _________________________________________________________________ >> > > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, >> > > please >> > > > visit: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com> >> > >> > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >> > > > and F1 Headlines >> > > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _________________________________________________________________ >> > > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, >> > > please >> > > > visit: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rolindsay%40yahoo.com> >> > >> > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >> > > > and F1 Headlines >> > > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _________________________________________________________________ >> > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >> > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/edwf430%40att.net >> > >> > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >> > and F1 Headlines >> > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> > >> > _________________________________________________________________ >> > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >> > >> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cmlf1%40optonline.net >> > >> > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >> > and F1 Headlines >> > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >> >> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/pokiebaron%40gmail.com >> >> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >> and F1 Headlines >> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> > >
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday), (continued)
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) cmlf1, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Dan Warlick, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) E M, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) cmlf1, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...wasRe: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) E M, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Martin Stark, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) Michael James, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
- Re: The Lifespan of a Modern Car with Electronics...was Re: Best car I've driven (A.K.A. Old man rambling on Tuesday) LS, December 4 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.