Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: George P . (ygpz4re![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 04:56:04 -0700 (PDT) |
Clyde wrote:
>
> Actually Ferrari went to belts initially because they were quieter > Go figure that one out! > The belts are very strong but the car needs to be driven True. Also keep in mind that belts don't need lubrication. I imagine that's a factor somehow. Would there be a cost benefit of not having to lube a belt v. having to lube a chain?
gp |
-
Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) George P ., May 7 2013
-
Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) Robert W. Garven Jr., May 7 2013
- Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) cjromero, May 8 2013
- Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) George P ., May 8 2013
- Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) Martin Stark, May 8 2013
- Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) cmlf1, May 8 2013
-
Re: belts and chains (was Friday Night Funnies) Robert W. Garven Jr., May 7 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.