Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BRIGANDBAR (BRIGANDBAR![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT) |
In a message dated 9/19/2006 2:17:27 P.M. Central Standard Time, charles [at] carolina-sound.com writes: is there any research to indicate having a backup for purposes other than something else to fire after your primary weapon is empty is worthwhile? Charles: Not for civilians that I know of. If you are venturing into "Indian Country" or anticipating "hostile action" I would suggest you bring along an AR-10 with a 16" bbl. and several 30 rd. magazines. That is what I carry when I do some hard core 4x4 back country exploring, but mostly because something like a mountain lion or a bear might be offended by my presence and not allow me to do what I would do first in any case, leave him, and his home undisturbed. My grandson has just reminded me that the Lone Ranger carries two guns, and I guess he is technically a civilian, so I guess he could be the exception that proves the rule. Other than that, one handgun is fine for me (but I'm too cheap for silver bullets <g>) Professionally, the reason for a (revolver) backup in tac ops is if you are injured in your hand and/or arm and cannot clear a malfunction or reload your pistol or other automatic or semi-automatic firearm, to ensure that you have access to a working firearm. Additionally, in a tac ops situation should you drop your primary firearm or otherwise become disarmed you have access to a weapon to continue to fight. I can tell you, as an experienced Crisis and Hostage Negotiator, that it is highly unlikely that you will access your backup firearm if you are being held hostage, and that a futile attempt to do so will endanger not only yourself, but any other hostages as well. Most agencies, military and Federal civilian have strict rules against surrendering your weapon under any circumstances except when disabled and thus unable to prevent it being taken away from you. Personally, I can think of no circumstance that I would be better off giving up my firearm to a third party than I would be resisting surrendering it to the best of my ability. But, once again to get back to the crux of the matter, most of us are generally civilians who carry a firearm for personal protection and should not expect to be "duty bound" to face down armed adversaries. Your best backup weapon is your cell phone, and your best tactic is to retreat whenever possible to a safer location. I no longer live my life in the "Red Zone", do well to function in the "Yellow Zone" except under certain circumstances and relax in the "Green" or "White" zones. Even when working I cannot remember needing additional armament for personal protection. I'm looking forward to the examples that Brian will provide as to when a backup firearm might be required. I may reevaluate my position should he recognize some circumstance that I have missed, or we may simply agree to disagree. Of course, if you lose control of the situation your backup firearm may be useful to your adversary. Dr. Steve Dr. Steve 1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III 1975 Pontiac GV Conv. 1980 MB 450SL 1982 RR Corniche 1994 F-350 Powerstroke 4x4 1996 Bronco 2000 Lincoln Town Car 2004 Excursion 1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder + Audrey's 3x MB's Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory Explosives Engineering Technologies Legal Notice: This message does not constitute legal or other professional advice, nor does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or fiduciary relationship between the sender and/or any other party Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise the sender immediately. Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.
-
Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms BRIGANDBAR, September 19 2006
-
Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Charles G. Perry IV, September 19 2006
- Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Dave Handa, September 19 2006
- Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms BRIGANDBAR, September 19 2006
-
Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Dave Handa, September 19 2006
- Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Martin Stark, September 19 2006
- Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Dave Handa, September 19 2006
-
Re: High Capacity Magazine Firearms Charles G. Perry IV, September 19 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.