Re: NFC BMW 740 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Conforti (lndshrk![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:15:00 -0800 (PST) |
At 02:57 AM 1/26/2007 -0500, LtWacko [at] aol.com wrote:
The best filtration write up I had read came from Jim C
while testing applications on an E36 M3 (If memory serves me).
We were testing filters FOR an application on an E36 M3.
Essentially it was what was found out and why we stopped using any form of "oiled-cotton-gauze" filter - regardless of any 1E6 mile warranties - that matters.
Those type of filters, while they might flow better when completely clean vs a STOCK PAPER FILTER, they have much less filter media area, and thus they "clog" much quicker and soon flow LESS than a STOCK PAPER FILTER.
Meanwhile they always let thru a bunch more dirt.
This isn't my opinion, nor a test done by another filter maker with an axe to grind as is oft opined. This is the scientific data from a professional filtration lab located in the N.E. US who has one of it's markets as NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS.
Filters to remove dangerous nuclides from coolant loops.
So you might guess they know what they are talking about.
They did me a BIG favor and for employment reasons the actual company must remain undisclosed.
The intakes I invented, and then co-developed w/ Eurosport were specifically designed to deal with those issues along with others more specific to BMW-land.
Executive summary: YMMV, but IMNSHO skip the oiled-gauze filters.
Jim
- Re: NFC BMW 740, (continued)
- Re: NFC BMW 740 Brian E. Buxton, January 25 2007
- Re: NFC BMW 740 Dan Spalding, January 25 2007
- Re: NFC BMW 740 Jim Conforti, January 26 2007
-
Re: NFC BMW 740 Jim Conforti, January 26 2007
- Re: NFC BMW 740 Steve Jenkins, January 26 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.