Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Pat Scopelliti (pscopell![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 19:35:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Ah, but you have ignored the interaction between the air and the road. On the race track the air is not moving relative to the road, and it is only the car that is moving. In a wind tunnel, the air flow is used to simulate the car moving through the air. But, in a simple (not rolling road tunnel) the ground is also effectively moving at the same speed as the car and that is not real-life. Pat Pat Scopelliti pscopell [at] stny.rr.com -----Original Message----- From: Rick Lindsay [mailto:rolindsay [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 8:50 PM To: Pat Scopelliti Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Hello wind tunnel chatters, Perhaps we're making an incorrect assumption. Does the rolling road have to run at the same speed as the airflow? Perhaps not. The biggest effect of the tire on an open wheel car is the cross-section area presented to the air flow. After that is the distortion of the spinning wheel on downstream air streamlines. Another point to consider: With a rolling road the underbody aerodynamics can be studied better. The question I ponder is whether the effect is linear? In my work on compressional waves (sound) and shear waves (particle motion a right angles to the direction of propagation), I have discovered that the equations that describe the propagation of waves through sediment (a.k.a. rock physics) are the same as the equations for aerodynamics! Strange that. Anyway, there are MANY concepts that are highly nonlinear. For example. The velocity of sound changes with the incompressibility and density of the medium supporting propagation. The velocity also changes with the frequency of the signal. I don't call it sound now because ultrasonics and ultra-low frequencies are included. To convert the velocities at ultrasonic frequencies to those at say, 10 hertz, the math is straight forward. The biggest change ( ~5% ) occurs between ultrasonic and about 15k Hz - the upper end of human hearing. Below that, the velocity changes very little (fraction of a percent) all the way down to almost zero. So, with all all this said, I wonder whether the rolling road effect is most influential between 150 and 200 mph or is that a zone where almost no change occurs. How about between stand-still and 50mph? Or 50mph and 250mph? It could make HUGE differences in the design, and therefore the cost of a rolling road wind tunnel. Physics is fun. regards, rick --- Pat Scopelliti <pscopell [at] stny.rr.com> wrote: > Just found this page showing a NASCAR car in a > rolling road wind tunnel. > Imagine that belt failing at 180 mph! > > http://www.jalopnik.com/cars/nascar/haas-builds-rolling-road-wind-tunnel-252 > 670.php > > Pat > > Pat Scopelliti > pscopell [at] stny.rr.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com > [mailto:ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 10:04 AM > To: Pat Scopelliti > Cc: The FerrariList > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari Sabotage? > > Just wondering. Don;t know much about wind tunnels > myself, but never > before heard of one failing - although it might > happen all the time. > Thought it strange that the failure was blamed for > so much of the > teams problems early in the season and now one of > the guys involved > in body design is suddenly cast as a "spy" - why not > saboteur? > > Scottie > > > On Jul 7, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Tom Reynolds wrote: > > > Yes, I heard that comment about the Ferrari logo, > Scotty and I > > thought both > > thoughts, the "good for you, kid" and also "you > little snitch." > > But, when > > you say "Also, does anyone else wonder if sabotage > might have > > something to > > do with the failure at the Ferrari windtunnel???" > do you mean that > > the wind > > tunnel failure might have been a part of the > alleged sabotage? > > Best regards, > > Tom > > > > > > > > From: "Ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com" > <ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com> > > To: "Tom Reynolds" <kjtar [at] cox.net> > > Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 8:19 AM > > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari Sabotage? > > > > > >> Did anyone else here the comment, during Practice > 2, that the case > >> began when a person working at a copy shop saw > the Ferrari logo on > >> the papers brought to him for duplication and > contacted the team. > >> Awesome. Some one needs to buy that lad a pint. > >> > >> I've heard McLaren's disavowal but can't help but > wonder if the FIA > >> will be forced to take action against them (and > therefore Alonzo and > >> Hamilton) to take a strong stand against this > behavior. How could > >> they ever prove that the information did not > effect the development > >> of their car or that no one else ever saw it. > >> > >> Eagerly awaiting the results of the FIA hearings. > >> > >> Also, does anyone else wonder if sabotage might > have something to do > >> with the failure at the Ferrari windtunnel??? > >> > >> Scottie > >> > >> > >> On Jul 7, 2007, at 8:50 AM, philville dejazzd.com > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I can't help but wonder if this is due to the > fact that many > >>> of us > >>> expect that this ( "crime of the century" ) > is close to the norm. > >>> > >>> Have a great week end, Phil > >>> > _________________________________________________________________ > >>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription > options, please visit: > >>> > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ferrarisimo% > >>> 40hotmail.com > >>> > >>> Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > >>> http://www.BidNip.com/ > >>> and F1 Headlines > >>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >> > >> > _________________________________________________________________ > >> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription > options, please visit: > >> > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/kjtar%40cox.net > >> > >> Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > >> http://www.BidNip.com/ > >> and F1 Headlines > >> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714 - > Release Date: > >> 3/8/07 > >> > >> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, > please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/pscopell%40stny.rr.com > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > http://www.BidNip.com/ > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, > please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rolindsay%40yahoo.com > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > http://www.BidNip.com/ > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >
- Re: Ferrari Sabotage?, (continued)
- Re: Ferrari Sabotage? Ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com, July 7 2007
- Re: Ferrari Sabotage? Pat Scopelliti, July 7 2007
- Re: Ferrari Sabotage? Pat Scopelliti, July 7 2007
- Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Rick Lindsay, July 7 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Pat Scopelliti, July 7 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Rick Lindsay, July 8 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? ken rentiers, July 8 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Rick Lindsay, July 8 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Robert W. Garven Jr., July 8 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.