Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rick Lindsay (rolindsay![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 11:57:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Excellent reference! I loved the rolling sidewalks idea when I first read those books. It brings to mind the concept, "Speed doesn't kill. Speed differential kills!" regards, rick --- ken rentiers <rentiers [at] mac.com> wrote: > Rick and FList: > > of course, as you no doubt know, this is not the > first time the > rolling roads have been sabotaged... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Roads_Must_Roll > > -ken- > > On Jul 8, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Rick Lindsay wrote: > > > Indeed. The entire 3-D solution is fascinating. > I've > > modeled 2-D simple solutions (aircraft wing > simulator) > > and that eats most of a modest computer. The real > 3-D > > solution is just way cool. > > > > rick > > > > --- Pat Scopelliti <pscopell [at] stny.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> Ah, but you have ignored the interaction between > the > >> air and the road. On > >> the race track the air is not moving relative to > the > >> road, and it is only > >> the car that is moving. In a wind tunnel, the > air > >> flow is used to simulate > >> the car moving through the air. But, in a simple > >> (not rolling road tunnel) > >> the ground is also effectively moving at the same > >> speed as the car and that > >> is not real-life. > >> > >> Pat > >> > >> Pat Scopelliti > >> pscopell [at] stny.rr.com > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rick Lindsay [mailto:rolindsay [at] yahoo.com] > >> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 8:50 PM > >> To: Pat Scopelliti > >> Cc: The FerrariList > >> Subject: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? > >> > >> Hello wind tunnel chatters, > >> Perhaps we're making an incorrect assumption. > >> Does > >> the rolling road have to run at the same speed as > >> the > >> airflow? Perhaps not. The biggest effect of the > >> tire > >> on an open wheel car is the cross-section area > >> presented to the air flow. After that is the > >> distortion of the spinning wheel on downstream > air > >> streamlines. > >> Another point to consider: With a rolling > road > >> the > >> underbody aerodynamics can be studied better. > The > >> question I ponder is whether the effect is > linear? > >> In > >> my work on compressional waves (sound) and shear > >> waves > >> (particle motion a right angles to the direction > of > >> propagation), I have discovered that the > equations > >> that describe the propagation of waves through > >> sediment (a.k.a. rock physics) are the same as > the > >> equations for aerodynamics! Strange that. > Anyway, > >> there are MANY concepts that are highly > nonlinear. > >> For example. The velocity of sound changes with > the > >> incompressibility and density of the medium > >> supporting > >> propagation. The velocity also changes with the > >> frequency of the signal. I don't call it sound > now > >> because ultrasonics and ultra-low frequencies are > >> included. To convert the velocities at > ultrasonic > >> frequencies to those at say, 10 hertz, the math > is > >> straight forward. The biggest change ( ~5% ) > occurs > >> between ultrasonic and about 15k Hz - the upper > end > >> of > >> human hearing. Below that, the velocity changes > >> very > >> little (fraction of a percent) all the way down > to > >> almost zero. > >> So, with all all this said, I wonder whether > the > >> rolling road effect is most influential between > 150 > >> and 200 mph or is that a zone where almost no > change > >> occurs. How about between stand-still and 50mph? > >> Or > >> 50mph and 250mph? It could make HUGE differences > in > >> the design, and therefore the cost of a rolling > road > >> wind tunnel. > >> Physics is fun. > >> > >> regards, > >> > >> rick > >> > >> --- Pat Scopelliti <pscopell [at] stny.rr.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Just found this page showing a NASCAR car in a > >>> rolling road wind tunnel. > >>> Imagine that belt failing at 180 mph! > >>> > >>> > >> > > > http://www.jalopnik.com/cars/nascar/haas-builds-rolling-road-wind- > > > tunnel-252 > >>> 670.php > >>> > >>> Pat > >>> > >>> Pat Scopelliti > >>> pscopell [at] stny.rr.com > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com > >>> [mailto:ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com] > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 10:04 AM > >>> To: Pat Scopelliti > >>> Cc: The FerrariList > >>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari Sabotage? > >>> > >>> Just wondering. Don;t know much about wind > >> tunnels > >>> myself, but never > >>> before heard of one failing - although it might > >>> happen all the time. > >>> Thought it strange that the failure was blamed > for > >>> so much of the > >>> teams problems early in the season and now one > of > >>> the guys involved > >>> in body design is suddenly cast as a "spy" - why > >> not > >>> saboteur? > >>> > >>> Scottie > >>> > >>> > >>> On Jul 7, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Tom Reynolds wrote: > >>> > >>>> Yes, I heard that comment about the Ferrari > >> logo, > >>> Scotty and I > >>>> thought both > >>>> thoughts, the "good for you, kid" and also "you > >>> little snitch." > >>>> But, when > >>>> you say "Also, does anyone else wonder if > >> sabotage > >>> might have > >>>> something to > >>>> do with the failure at the Ferrari > >> windtunnel???" > >>> do you mean that > >>>> the wind > >>>> tunnel failure might have been a part of the > >>> alleged sabotage? > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Tom > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> From: "Ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com" > >>> <ferrarisimo [at] hotmail.com> > >>>> To: "Tom Reynolds" <kjtar [at] cox.net> > >>>> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 8:19 AM > >>>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Ferrari Sabotage? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Did anyone else here the comment, during > >> Practice > >>> 2, that the case > >>>>> began when a person working at a copy shop saw > >>> the Ferrari logo on > >>>>> the papers brought to him for duplication and > >>> contacted the team. > >>>>> Awesome. Some one needs to buy that lad a > >> pint. > >>>>> > >>>>> I've heard McLaren's disavowal but can't help > >> but > >>> wonder if the FIA > >>>>> will be forced to take action against them > (and > >>> therefore Alonzo and > >>>>> Hamilton) to take a strong stand against this > >>> behavior. How could > >>>>> they ever prove that the information did not > >>> effect the development > >>>>> of their car or that no one else ever saw it. > >>>>> > >>>>> Eagerly awaiting the results of the FIA > >> hearings. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, does anyone else wonder if sabotage > might > >>> have something to do > >>>>> with the failure at the Ferrari windtunnel??? > >>>>> > >>>>> Scottie > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Jul 7, 2007, at 8:50 AM, philville > >> dejazzd.com > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I can't help but wonder if this is due to > >> the > >>> fact that many > >>>>>> of us > >>>>>> expect that this ( "crime of the century" > ) > >>> is close to the norm. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Have a great week end, Phil > >>>>>> > >>> > >> > > > _________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription > >>> options, please visit: > >>>>>> > >>> > >> > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ferrarisimo% > >>>>>> 40hotmail.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > >>>>>> http://www.BidNip.com/ > >>>>>> and F1 Headlines > >>>>>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > > > _________________________________________________________________ > >>>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription > >>> options, please visit: > >>>>> > >>> > >> > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/kjtar%40cox.net > >>>>> > >>>>> Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > >>>>> http://www.BidNip.com/ > >>>>> and F1 Headlines > >>>>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > >>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >>>>> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: > 268.18.8/714 > >> - > >>> Release Date: > >>>>> 3/8/07 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > _________________________________________________________________ > >>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription > >> options, > >>> please visit: > >>> > >> > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/pscopell% > > > 40stny.rr.com > >>> > >>> Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > >>> http://www.BidNip.com/ > >>> and F1 Headlines > >>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > _________________________________________________________________ > >>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription > >> options, > >>> please visit: > >>> > >> > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rolindsay% > > > 40yahoo.com > >>> > >>> Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > >>> http://www.BidNip.com/ > >>> and F1 Headlines > >>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription > options, please visit: > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rentiers% > > > 40mail.com > > > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > > http://www.BidNip.com/ > > and F1 Headlines > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > >
- Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage?, (continued)
- Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Rick Lindsay, July 7 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Pat Scopelliti, July 7 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Rick Lindsay, July 8 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? ken rentiers, July 8 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Rick Lindsay, July 8 2007
- Re: Rolling roads, was: Ferrari Sabotage? Robert W. Garven Jr., July 8 2007
- Carb 308 ignition timing Peter Pless, July 8 2007
- Re: Carb 308 ignition timing Rick Lindsay, July 8 2007
- Re: Carb 308 ignition timing Peter Pless, July 8 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.